It's time to stop destructive regulatory habits

What ails Maine?

Specifically, what ails health care, energy, taxation and regulatory policy, education, innovation, connectivity, our quality of place and business climate?

Public officials and private citizens have certainly studied these topics enough times, over too many years, to be able to answer that very broad question. But, so far, the answer isn’t clear.

What Maine needs to do to excite business, ease access to health care, boost education achievement, reduce regulatory hurdles, reduce energy costs and increase communication networks is not just a series of nagging questions. It’s a drumbeat of survival.

Last week, the Maine State Chamber of Commerce together with the Maine Development Foundation released a compelling report that reflects the sum total of hundreds of previous state agency reports ever commissioned to study taxes, education, business, health care, transportation, communication, etc., etc., and etc.

The Chamber and MDF reviewed hundreds of reports and reduced them to their common denominators. Then, incorporating the responses of 1,000 businesses surveyed about living and working in Maine, they produced a 12-point analysis focused on what ails Maine and called it: Making Maine Work.

The partners don’t pretend to answer the questions they pose. They merely gathered years of data into a useful format that they hope will be food for thought, and then catalyst for action, for Maine’s next governor. (The report is available at mainechamber.org)

According to Dana Connors, president of the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, he and MDF CEO Laurie Lachance will present their findings to each of the five gubernatorial candidates in the next month, and ask them to consider the anthology as each looks to the Blaine House and the work that lies beyond Election Day.

For instance, Maine continues to have a greater per capita state and local tax burden than the U.S. average. That burden stifles Maine’s people, its businesses and its future.

Maine’s population is getting older, which the Making Maine Work report rightly concludes exerts greater pressure on Maine’s housing, labor force, health care systems, transportation and state budget. Our educated youth are leaving for more promising environments in other states, further stressing the population left behind.

What the Chamber and MDF have concluded by reading years of Maine-based research, is that in order to improve Maine’s business climate, we must address the challenges of health insurance costs, energy, taxes, regulations and transportation. In that order.

Maine is currently ranked eighth highest in the United States for its cost of doing business, according to the Making Maine Work report. You can hardly blame a business for looking elsewhere, where costs are less.

But it isn’t just raw costs that deter growth here.

When Kim Jeffery, president and CEO of Nestle Waters North America, was in Maine last week, he mentioned how time-consuming and exhausting it has been to combat 16 different legislative efforts over the past several years to limit business development or to implement new taxes on the

$4 billion company.

Considering the hundreds of Maine people employed by Nestle through its Poland Spring bottling operation, the money it pays in property, income and corporate taxes, never mind the gas taxes paid for fuel used to truck its product, and the very basic truth that every bottle of water the company sells around the world is a commodity that “markets” everything good in Maine, do we really want to chase the company off with regulatory whips and chains and shrug off that revenue?

Of course not.

The key, according to Connors and LaChance, is a commitment by policymakers to change the bureaucratic culture in Augusta in a way that gets regulators to “see their jobs as helping Maine people and Maine businesses succeed.” And, then, once the realization is struck, to pursue that course with conviction.

Whether Maine’s next governor is up for the task means a lot to Maine people. It means our very future.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

Grady's picture

TRUST NESTLE - YEAH, RIGHT

De-regulation is the answer all right. Just like the commercial banking industry was de-regulated - what a great idea that was. And off-shore oil drilling -- who needs extra safety measures? Who needs a back-up plan, just in case? And almost forgot - Massey Energy. Don't forget the 29 miners who died a couple of months ago. And as far as Nestle is concerned, I think we should just keep on letting a giant, foreign, multi-national keep taking our water and making billions off of it. They're not making enough profit as it is. Are we citizens of Maine such backwoods bumpkins that we buy into that garbage? The Lewiston Sun Journal's editorial board has obviously been into the Kool-Aid (uh, Nestea).

SSDD's picture

Easy answers to dumb questions

"Specifically, what ails health care, energy, taxation and regulatory policy, education, innovation, connectivity, our quality of place and business climate?"

Obesity. Fat people require more of everything. You wonder why health care costs so much? Obesity translates into 147 BILLION dollars per year in added medical costs for the country. That is more than the costs associated with cancer. Quality of place means multiple forms of transportation, but can a fat person walk a mile to work? Ride a bike? Take the bus? Nope they use their car so they can stop at Dunkin Donuts and stuff their gaping mouths with crap.
Impose a fat tax - for ever % over a 25 BMI you pay $1,000 into a wellness fund used to provide health care and nutritious lunches to our children. It would give people all the encouragement they need to lose weight and become fit. That done the rest of the policy issues you asked about begin to take care of themselves.

PS - Maine is the highest user of public health care in the nation.

sandra2's picture

SSD, AIDS costs a lot more

SSD, AIDS costs a lot more per person than obesity, are you recommending we tax homosexuality? Of course not because you are just a bigoted bully who picks on those who are easy to pick on and avoids those with more power than yourself. Just like all self absorbed bullies.

SSDD's picture

So wrong, not sure where to start

1. Obesity and it's side effects cost significantly more than AIDS
2. Aids is not restricted to homosexuals. Plenty of bible thumping atraight folks get AIDS from unprotected sex and drug use.
3. We should tax stupidity, but then you'd be broke.

verified

Bob67

I agree with Mr. Albrecht that the State of Maine may not be perfect, but extending corporate welfare to Nestle is as senseless as, or even more so than allowing some of the less fortunate of us, I'm disabled, acessto health care

mrnpchick's picture
verified

The Soviet experiment in

The Soviet experiment in Maine has failed and its up to the next governor to change course. The sign at the state borders says, "Maine, the way life should be." When I first moved to Maine 22 yrs ago, people were working and thriving. Now, 25% are stuck on the state dole, with no job prospects, and no self esteem. People want to contribute, and I believe its time for the state to help bring jobs back to Maine and stop getting in the way of job development. Let's give people the chance to work, that's what a vast majority of people want. Now, off to work for me, thankfully, although as I work in healthcare, I'd be more comfortable with my employment if the state would pay their MaineCare bills.

veritas's picture
verified

What apologists for Nestle!!

The reason it's a $4 billion company in Maine is because that's the value of Maine's natural resource, spring water, that it's siphoning off from the citizens of our State. So start charging them as other countries charge us for their unground resources. If they don't like it - they can leave; no doubt some competitor would be more than happy to to take over that niche......

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

Same old story

Please cut welfare for the poor but give it to a $4 billion corporation.
The failure of federal regulation resulted in the 2007 Bush Recession that has put 8.4 million people out of work and the Gusher in the Gulf of Mexico. Now is the time to increase regulation, end the revolving door between regulatory agencies and the corporations they regulate, and to collect taxes from corporations like Exxon-Mobil that pay none.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...