Democrat has most cash in Maine governor's race

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Democrat Libby Mitchell has the most cash on hand as Maine's open race for governor, now down to five contestants, enters its final months, new campaign finance reports show.

Libby Mitchell
Pat Wellenbach/Associated Press

Libby Mitchell gestures during a debate of the four Democratic gubernatorial candidates at the University of Southern Maine in Portland on Wednesday evening.

Mitchell, who has the only campaign that's receiving public funding, had more than $506,000 in cash as of the close of the last reporting period July 13, according to her filing with the state Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices.

Republican Paul LePage reported more than $260,000 in cash, while independent Eliot Cutler reported $67,000 in cash. The other two independents, Shawn Moody and Kevin Scott, reported $353,000 and $3,170 in cash respectively.

The disparity in cash figures does not necessarily reflect the campaigns' potential to raise more funds as the Nov. 2 general election draws closer. Cutler has already spent more than $800,000 for the general election, figures show. The reports were due before midnight Tuesday.

"We have a very aggressive fundraising plan" that includes online as well as direct mail appeals, meet-and-greets and other public events, Cutler campaign spokesman Ted O'Meara said Wednesday. Campaign funding will be competitive with that of the two major-party candidates, O'Meara added.

LePage, the Waterville mayor, led the other privately funded candidates with $179,000 in donations during the most recent reporting period, which covered May 26 to July 13. He also has some high-profile fundraising events planned, including a coastal whistlestop run dubbed the "LePage Express" Saturday aboard the Maine Eastern Railroad. Donors riding in the coach will pay $100 per person, while those riding in the exclusive Parlor Car will pony up $750 for a seat.

Mitchell, the state Senate president whose campaign qualified for funding under the Maine Clean Election Act, will be limited to a maximum of $1.2 million for the general election no matter how much her rivals raise, according to the ethics commission. How much her campaign receives up to that amount depends on how much is the other candidates spend and how much independent advertising aimed at defeating her is spent.

Reports also give a complete picture of pre-primary spending. Republican Les Otten turned out to be the biggest spender in both gubernatorial primaries, putting $2.7 million — including a $2.2 million loan from himself — into the race. Otten finished second in GOP balloting even though he outspent LePage almost 20 to 1.

Among the other Republicans, Bruce Poliquin spent $1.4 million, including a large chunk of in-kind donations to his campaign. Peter Mills was the only Republican to qualify for public funding, $644,000. Steve Abbott spent about $460,000, Bill Beardsley spent $330,000 and Matt Jacobson $191,000, according to reports.

Among the Democrats, Steve Rowe spent about $530,000, Rosa Scarcelli spent $822,000 and Pat McGowan, who was publicly funded, spent $675,000.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

So, by your logic, if

President Obama doesn't reinstate the bush tax cuts, he raises taxes? So it isn't bushes fault that he passed the tax cuts with a expiration date? Hmmm, you guys keep finding new way to blame Democrats for your failures. Not working this time, the cuts expire, and not one day too soon. In fact the US lost billions on the repeal of the inheritance tax this year alone.

 's picture

Republicans had the votes to pass the tax cuts, what they didn't

have was an answer to the pesky law that required it be revenue neutral, or expire. So instead of cutting spending to pay for the wealthy tax cuts, they put an expiration date. So it will be bush's fault. I am certain that you didn't credit President Obama with the last two years of the bush wealthy tax cuts, did you? So this is completely bush's fault, and you cannot deny it. With a straight face, at least.

 's picture

Don't misclassify my positions,

I'm virtually middle of the road. It only seems leftist for you because anything to the left of Genghis Khan is considered socialist. However, there are more people in the mainstream, like me, than in your rarefied world.

Doreen Sheive's picture

public funds

I am upset that we have spent our money for primary runs. I do not believe that primary candidates should receive public funding. Considering that we spent almost $2M for Mitchell, Mills and McGowan to run against each other in the primary. Now, we are giving Mitchell another $600,000 for the general election. This is a lot of money for people to fulfill their egos -- not all of the candidates are doing it solely for their egos, but some are.

Steve Bannister's picture

Actually.....

the numbers listed by this "ultra conservative rag" are what those left in the race for the Blaine House have on hand as of 7/13. The numbers for monies spent in the "PRE"-primary candidates are those numbers you are having issue with.

math it's a "fuzzy" thing for ultra-libs.

GARY SAVARD's picture

Libby Mitchell should have

Libby Mitchell should have the most cash on hand. We the taxpayers gave her $660,000 to spend...and, there are various loopholes and such that will enable her to get some contributions and advertising on the side. Ain't life grand?

 's picture

What about 2.7 million and 20

What about 2.7 million and 20 to 1 do you not comprehend? DO THE MATH if you are able.

 's picture

The last three paragraphs

give that information, if you are unable to read that far all at once, try doing it in stages.

 's picture

I read that far and did not

I read that far and did not read how much Libby spent either.

Shouldn't that also be a problem for you?

 's picture

Interestingly, the candidate that this paper is supporting

LePage, hasn't disclosed how much money he spent on the primary. Or the SJ just 'forgot' to report it. It appears some impartial reporting isn't going to happen here.

 's picture

The article merely reports on

The article merely reports on how much money Gubernatorial candidates have at this time in their coffers. Not how much money they spent on primary elections, dog food, in Libby's case (detailing make up from a local mortician), etc,etc.

 's picture

Mitchell feels that having

Mitchell feels that having kissed more butt that a toilet seat as a politician she should sock it to the electorate once again time by receiving public funding. Can you say LOSER.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...