Many voices are needed in support of meeting the challenge of our changing climate, with all the accompanying effects on health, environment and the lives of our children and grandchildren. There have been numerous highly emotional pleas from “friends...” of this and that, yet none of them say what a real friend would say, and what we might not want to hear.
Mitigating and adapting to climate change demands every possible resource we have, and wind power is one of those, (along with solar, geothermal, hydro, biomass, nuclear and, most important of all, conservation).
Surprisingly, however, there are highly intelligent folk out there who choose to resist wind for many reasons, only two of which are valid, i.e., turbines do change the view, and they do make noise. A true friend will tell you this, and then go on to say to make a gain we have to make a sacrifice; and the true friend will also tell you that there is no medical support for the claims of negative health effects, even though, to my personal embarrassment, some of my colleagues have stated such.
I recall in the 1950s when seat belts were introduced, it took the support of the medical profession to educate the public to comply. The time has come again when we physicians must educate the people of Maine as to the value of wind as part of the “silver buckshot” that we need, as a friend, to deal with the threat of climate change.
Richard K. Jennings, MD, Fayette
Buck Shot (BS) is the last resort when you've run out of argumen
The only reason that Dr. Wind and Agnes King say we have to use everything is that way there's no examination of the component parts of "everything" and wind sneaks its way through by hopefully blending unnoticed in the crowd.
But the minute industrial wind is examined in isolation, it is an economic insult to hard working Mainers who can ill afford to pay double for the the fancy lad elitists' pet energy source. Beyond wind's huge cost, it also adds substantially to Mainer's electric bills because it is for Baldacci's wind friends alone that the $1.6 Billion CMP upgrade needs to be built. Funded 100% by ratepayers.
Sure, the prostituting usual suspects of construction companies and law firms will shape up foer each wind project because they can make some money for a small time up until the construction is finished and a single jobis left behind for every 10 turbines. These prostitutes plave the almighty dollar ahead of Maine and their neighbors.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.no way
4out of 5 doctors claim smoking menthol cigarettes is good for you , according to ads from the 60's.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sacrifice??????
Yes, let's all sacrifice our quality of life, property value, homes, wildlife, rights, and our tax dollars so that environmental criminals like First Wind, Trans Canada, Agnus King, et al can reap profits from subsidies, grants and tax credits.
Pre-emptive destruction of mountaintop forests, streams, wetlands, and wildlife in the name of now discredited global warming is insanity.
I'm glad you're not my doctor. I feel sorry for your patients.
Use Less
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Dr. Jennings is wrong
I see Dr. Jennings is back with his diatribe about how we have to save the planet with wind turbines and, as usual, is wrong, wrong, wrong. We in Maine do not have any reason whatsoever to sacrifice the beautiful mountains of western Maine and the uplands in the lakes region of northeastern Maine to save the planet. Wind is not the answer, Dr. Jennings.
I am amazed that someone with the intelligence to earn advanced degrees can bemain so narrowly focussed on the wrong solution. Wind is bad public policy. It is bad economics. Maybe its good policy and economics because Dr. Jennings has a financial interest in wind development?
I ask everyone, as individuals, the following economics question: would you ever buy anything that only works at best 30% of its capacity? Would you buy anything on which your way of life depended that was totally unpredictable and unreliable, that is, it could quit on you just as you were depending on it? Would you buy anything that, in its useful lifetime, would never save you the money you invested in it and, indeed, need complete backup? It is irrational to say yes, yet that is exactly what we get with wind power! Seems to me that is a valid reason to oppose widespread destruction of hundreds of miles of our ridgelines.
We have a $13 trillion national debt. Yet the government continues to subsidize wind at $23.37 per megawatt hour; the next highest subsidy is $1.59 per mwh (USEIA, 2008). Where does the subsidy come from? TAXPAYERS! Or, we simply add it to the national debt. Here's a nice piece of irony. China buys much of our national debt. Money we borrow from the Chinese goes to subsidize wind companies, which buy their turbines from---you guessed it---China! Anyone else believe that is bad public policy? Dr. Jennings, there is another vaild reason to oppose industrial wind deveklopment.
Without heavy subsidization, there wouldn't be a wind turbine erected anywhere, and especially not in a poor wind potential area like Maine. Private investors will never touch it. The government needs to stay out of it, drop the preferential treatment and subsidization of wind and let free markets determine from what sources our electricity is generated. As for Dr. Jennings, if you love wind turbines so well, I suggest you move to Altamont Pass in California.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Dr. Turbine - what are you getting?
Dr. Turbine - are you willing to make a statement that you do not have any financial interests directly or indirectly from wind complexes blighting the Maine countryside and robbing the people of their serenity?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Do you mean..
like Dr. Geoff Levanthal, who wrote, "As a paid consultant for Noble Environmental Power, I Geoff Levanthal..." In Noble's office, Mark Lyons opened an email to show me what Levanthal had to say about Pierpont. I don't even know what the rest of the letter said. I said, i don't need to read any more, have a great day. I subsequently wrote a letter to the local Editor. It was soon followed, in a professional manner, by a letter from Levanthal explaining that he was indeed paid by the developer.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Why be embarrassed about the truth
Seems I am personally offended when you speak about educated people resisting industrial wind monsters. I personally know many people that have gotten ill from them, have seen somebody crash because of them, have followed Dr. Pierpont's studies. This is very real,my friend. It's called "Wind Turbine Syndrome" and is recognized world wide. I am very proud to not just resist them, but being personally responsible for booting them out of my quaint little town, where I moved to from a nasty industrialized city, to get away from industry. I treasure the foothills of the Adirondacks where I found my new home 21 years ago. I see how natives take all of the beauties for granted. I have also witnessed people in upstate New York and other states get ill and abandon their homes, because they did not sell after 3 years on the market. This is very, very, real, so come out of your shell and open your ears and your eyes, maybe even your heart. Cherish your natural surroundings because once they are gone, they are gone for good. Land is NOT a renewable product
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.A 'Friend' speaks up about Big Wind and Health
Aw, doc. You're doing it again. Do you have any idea how many people ask, "Why doesn't Dr. Jennings get it? Why won't he LISTEN to people... to PATIENTS? " That' sir, is the sign of a true doctor, a good doctor. A doctor who adheres to his oath. He listens to the complaints of the people he's sworn to try to heal and nurture.
Surely, you can not reasonably ignore the many, many people who have legitimate complaints? Have you ever actually SPOKEN to any of them? If you are TRULY interested in being a friend and a doctor, please contact me. I can put you in direct contact with many people whose health is being adversely affected by industrial wind. No human being could listen and not be moved... not be concerned. No matter how often you say it isn't so, the facts don't change. You do the people of Maine a disservice by using your degree to try to sound like an expert in the area of industrial wind and its associated health risks without first treating the patients affected. We are inclined to believe the words of a man with an MD after his name. Please do not take advantage of the PEOPLE by speaking on this topic until you have interviewed a host of individuals who are suffering from maladies associated with industrial wind turbines.
You did your best to disrupt the forum I spoke at in Brunswick. I allowed you to have your say, even though a true gentleman would have gone to the trouble to arrange his OWN forum rather than try to take over one which was put together by hard-working activists who BELIEVE what they are doing-- who BELIEVE they are right. Because, you see... we listen to the experts... those who are unbiased and have nothing to gain (and often, much to lose) by speaking out and sharing the FACTS they have discovered. Your 'silver buckshot' reference, sadly, makes me wonder if you have a stake in Angus King's projects, as that is one of his standard tag lines when trying to sell his product. I hope that's not the case. I hope it is simply that you are too set in your ways, or too stubborn to listen to opposing views and give them credence... For a stubborn man can relent, and will gain the respect of his peers by admitting he was wrong. Some of our legislators have done that very thing.
You belittle your fellow citizens who have spent months researching industrial wind by pretending to know what our motivations are. While scenic impact in this beautiful mountainous region is certainly an important factor to take into account, due to the potential economic fall-out and Mainers' hard-sought 'quality of place', the 'view' is simply NOT the issue of paramount importance to many of us. If it was proven to you that IW was NOT economically feasible, if we could show you research done by scientists and physicists that shows IW does NOT reduce dependence on fossil fuels or reduce carbon emissions-- would you then begin to question the intelligence of destroying our high terrain and fragile ecosystems? If we could show you that property values in the vicinity of IW plummet-- sometimes as much as 40% or more, would that convince you to stop touting Big WInd as 'silver buckshot'? Seriously, sir... we have access to FACTS-- facts that the people of Maine deserve to know. If you are a caring man and professional, surely you will avail yourself of the resources we can provide to you. Surely you can then put your title of 'doctor' to its best possible use, and begin to help heal the wounds this misguided plan has created across this wonderful state.
I urge you not to be stubborn-- not to be too set in your ways to consider information from sources other than the wind industry. They have millions of dollars at stake-- they are biased and have a huge conflict of interest. Please give heed to those who are selflessly trying to educate a public which has been misled and taken advantage of. Simply tell me what specific topics you would like to learn more about, and I will put you in touch with experts and reference materials. You will grow in the estimation of many if you keep an open mind and disseminate the facts rather than the Industry's propaganda. I look forward to working with you on this issue, if you so desire. I am not an expert, and have no title with which to garner respect. But I am an American and a Mainer who is committed to taking care of my native state and those who call it 'home'
Respectfully Submitted, Karen Pease, Lexington Twp., ME
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.anti IW
Karen,
why are we being censored? Why is the only education through the back door as comment sections?
Please keep writing, it is one of our tools.
I am educating door to door this month with a petition for wind ordinance in hand. I am an IMFY and i have lived off the grid for 10 years.
Allice Barnett, south carthage Maine
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The problem is..
We don't spend enough money in the newspapers, so windies get priority. Then they have people that come on and click report button so they remove the comments. The truth hurts..it's all about money, cut your neighbors throat, destroy their quality of life so they get $2K-$6K a year. I would rather have my peace of mind and quality of life, one cannot put a dollar amount on that.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The problem is
We taxpayers will likely have to subsidize the windpower projects for the MD's who can afford to make the investments and it will be a lose-lose situation for us taxpayers/dirt bags as usual. I say go for it. But do it with, your "own money"! If you cannot do it with your own money there must be a problem. In terms of global warming there is none. Don't you listen to Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck, Sean Hannity, Howie Carr and the rest of the folks on FOX. They cant all be wrong just because they are all parrots. Can they?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Richard you write "The time
Richard you write "The time has come again when we physicians must educate the people of Maine as to the value of wind as part of the “silver buckshot” that we need, as a friend, to deal with the threat of climate change." I didn't know being a MD made you an expert on the climate or wind mills. But please explain any studies done on the noise/medical issue and the results of that study. I for one would like to hear that information from a MD.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Great Response
..furthermore, bear in mind, Nina Pierpont, MD, PhD, yes MD, PhD, is qualified to speak on both subjects as a physician and a scientist. Cheers
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.