Most object to proposed mountain ordinance

BYRON — Most of the approximately 20 people who turned out for Monday's public hearing on a proposed Mountain District Ordinance appeared to be against it, and not because it would essentially ban the development of a wind farm project.

Eileen M. Adams/Sun Journal

Byron Selectmen Cory Freeman, Anne Simmons-Edmunds and Lisa Gallant field questions about a proposed Mountain District Ordinance at a public hearing Monday night.

Instead, those who spoke were concerned with the possible affect it might have on logging, mining and future plans landowners might have.

The town will vote on the ordinance, which was written by an independent group of residents, at a special town meeting set for 6:30 p.m. Aug. 30 at the Coos Canyon Schoolhouse.

No one from that group was at Monday's hearing and none could be reached by telephone for comment.

Selectman Anne Simmons-Edmunds said the proposed ordinance had been turned down last year because of concern about restrictions on the construction of logging roads. That section was changed.

However, allowing mining, such as gravel mining or rock crushing, would not be allowed above 1,600 feet.

“This ought to be shot down right off the bat,” said one man. “This town exists on mining.”

Mark Armstrong, an employee of Wagner Forestry Management, said applying the restrictions as outlined in the four-page proposed ordinance at 1,600 feet was too low.

“LURC and others set the height at 2,700 feet,” he said.

Randy Richards said the only reason for the proposed ordinance was to restrict wind turbines.

“Let's not hurt anyone else,” he said.

John Sutton, an employee of American Forestry Management, said about 10,000 acres owned by his company would be affected by the proposed ordinance.

The town believed it had outlawed wind turbine development about two years ago when an overwhelmingly majority of voters refused to increase the building structure height from 30 feet to a height that would accommodate wind turbines under the town's building code, Selectman Lisa Gallant said.

Most turbines proposed in the Western Maine area are at least 300 tall.

But questions arose as to whether a building code height restriction could govern wind turbine development.

Dan McKay, an organizer of a group in Dixfield that is fighting the development of a wind farm, said his town is doing the same thing as the proposed Mountain District Ordinance in Byron is trying to do. He didn't believe a building code restriction was strong enough.

“If you don't put something in effect, you can't stop windmills,” he said.

Although Geraldine Richards opposes wind farm development, she said the proposed ordinance was not yet complete.

Simmons-Edmunds said people should vote it down if they disagreed with it.

"But you will see it again,” she said.

She said the proposed ordinance was reviewed by the Androscoggin Valley Council of Governments, the town Planning Board, and accepted by the Board of Selectmen before it went to Monday's public hearing.

It aims to prevent serious erosion, to preserve continued access to mountains, forests and waterways for leisure, recreation and sporting activities, and to preserve the town's vistas.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

Dan McKay's right

building code restrictions aren't enough. But you have to codify the restrictions in something permanent. They must be certain, tough, and based on science

 's picture

It's amazing what people think.

Jeffyd thinks, "you dont have the right to tell people what they can put on there land". Of course you do. That's what zoning ordinances are all about. Property rights are not absolute. Now if you are a billionaire like Simplot, the potato king, you can fight an order to remove the humongus American Flag you have on your property that is so noisy that police in downtown Boise, ID can't pull anyone over. But if you are just a retired veteran they might succeed in forcing removal of your much small American Flag.

 's picture

so sick of the anti wind farm movement

you dont have the right to tell people what they can put on there land. you dont like the noise move. everybody has to deal with some level of noise they dont like.

 's picture

Nice to see people finally catching on.

It is nice to see people finally catching on that these "wind power" ordinances are either just the beginning or as written would already affect other existing or common land uses in Maine such as mining (gravel operations) and lumbering. It is nice to see people realizing that these proposals while "wind power" today may well be attacks on their livelihoods tomorrow and are attacks on landowner rights however you look at it. The proposed Rumford ordianance if you deleted "wind turbines" would prohibit the mill from operation, the power company on the falls and the gas plant, would have prohibited the pelet manufacturer that had looked at Rumford and even effected homes and every day activities like shaving with an electric razor and mowing the lawn. I hope the people of Rumford will remember that when and if that proposal ever goes to vote. I commend the folks in Roxbury for their forward thinking; I hope the people throughout the state will do the same.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...