Wind ordinance angst builds in Rumford

RUMFORD — Depending on what selectmen decide at next Wednesday's special meeting, voters trying to adopt an ordinance on Nov. 2 to regulate wind farms could face two proposals instead of one.

Currently, selectmen have accepted one proposed ordinance from the Wind Power Advisory Committee, which spent nine months adapting Dixmont's ordinance for Rumford.

Like the Dixmont ordinance, the committee's document was quickly labeled anti-wind last month by Neil Kiely of First Wind LLC of Newton, Mass.

First Wind has tentatively proposed constructing a $60 million, 12-turbine project on sections of Black Mountain and a nearby mountain.

Kiely said that if this ordinance passes in November, such action would be a permanent moratorium on wind power.

That's why Board of Selectmen Chairman Brad Adley recently proposed a second ordinance: the Maine State Planning Office's Model Wind Energy Facility Ordinance.

That ordinance, which follows wind power development standards determined by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, has been labeled pro-wind.

“My position is the people of this town deserve another option if we can get there and give them a good viable option,” Adley said late Thursday afternoon.

“It's late in the game, so we're trying to hustle to get this second option up and let the voters tell us and see where it all goes. Once the dust settles out of the election, whatever rule book they give us, we'll play by that rule book.”

He said that without a second option, he fears that Rumford would be left without protection from wind farm development should voters defeat the committee's ordinance.

Both proposals can be accessed from the town's website at www.rumfordmaine.net.

When he broached the off-agenda topic at Wednesday night's special board meeting — Kiely was present, but didn't say anything — Adley immediately ran afoul of Selectman Greg Buccina, who staunchly defended the committee's document.

Both Adley and Buccina were members of the committee and both helped draft its ordinance proposal, even though selectmen never tasked the committee with doing so, something that also raised Selectman Mark Belanger's ire Wednesday night.

Adley sought to fast-track a vote by the whole board on the second option by having them meet at 6 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 15, in Rumford Falls Auditorium, because he and Belanger can't attend Thursday's regular board meeting. That's when the Nov. 2 ordinance warrant would have been voted.

Buccina and Adley argued, with Adley advocating the second proposal and Buccina sticking with the first proposal.

“I don't think a second ordinance is needed,” Buccina said. “I think you ask citizens to get involved — and they did — and then all of a sudden we say, 'We don't like what they have so we've come up with something else?' I don't think that's politically good.”

Later, Buccina said he didn't think the second proposal “does anything to protect the citizens of this community.”

“It's a pro-wind ordinance,” Buccina said. “All that is, is a gateway for companies to do whatever they want to do with wind.”

He then asked if the state model was “so good,” then why aren't other towns also adopting it?

Adley ignored the question, instead asking the board as a whole to vote on both proposals next week.

Raising his voice, Buccina then said of the pro-wind ordinance, “Why the hell do we need that thing? Why is that all important? You want to have a special meeting on a piece of legislation that we haven't had ample time to review, and only because a couple people aren't in favor of an ordinance we took nine months to develop?”

“I've never taken a position on that,” Adley said. “I think the citizens deserve two options.”

“And I don't,” Buccina said.

After choosing next Wednesday to decide the matter, Belanger weighed in, also raising his voice.

“When this whole committee thing was designed, it was advisory only,” he said. “And as we went through the process, I kept asking Brad where we're at, and all of a sudden you guys were making an ordinance and we never authorized them to do an ordinance.”

“And you never said anything,” Buccina said.

“Because (Brad) kept saying to me, 'We're going to tweak it at the end!'” Belanger said. “That's the only reason I didn't stir up any crap. And I'll tell you what, I'll stir up crap.”

“You go right ahead,” Buccina said.

“I will,” Belanger said.

“You have every right to do that,” Buccina said.

tkarkos@sunjournal.com

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

blueyes1119's picture

Oh, Candiceanne!

My dear, you get so worked up! Thanks for the great rants---good entertainment. My best laugh was your TIF remarks. He! He! Ask your dear friend Mr. Kiely how many First Wind projects in Maine have they not demanded a TIF. In Lincoln, they said straight out No TIF, no wind project. They just said the same thing in Eastbrook. They secured TIFs in Mars Hill and with the Washington County Commissioners for Stetson and these same commissioners have voted a TIF for the Bowers Mt. proposal before there was even an application submitted. At the July 1, 2010 Selectman's meeting, at which I'm sure you took copious notes, Kiely said First Wind would seek tax increment financing from Rumford for the project. You see, this is such a delicate financial deck of cards that every conceivable hand out is needed to make it work.
Now, my well intentioned blogger, you surely show that in spite of the voluminous nature of your rant, you don't know a thing about the TIF laws when you state: "In fact, state rules governing TIFs would not permit a TIF to cover a wind power project because of the depleted value of the town and county" My first reaction to that is "Huh???" It makes no sense, unless, of course Rumford has TIF'd the entire value of the paper mill and Rumford Power. I have memorized the Lincoln First Wind TIF document like some people memorize the Gettysburg Address. Have you ever consulted with Brian Hodges, the state official who reviews TIFs? Please, dear, don't allege that I know nothing about TIFs. No hurt feeling, though, OK?
Last point, then off to bed. What the hell is your reference to "state processes" that took 15 years, etc. Whew! That entire paragraph is one run on rant sentence! Anyhow, to set your record straight, on May 8, 2007, an executive order was signed by Gov. Baldacci creating the Governor's Task Force on Wind Power Development. Its membership was selected by Baldacci to create what he wanted and citizen input was never sought. On April 18, 2008, Gov. Baldacci signed into law S.P. 908 - An Act To Implement Recommendations of the Governor's Task Force on Wind Power Development. The bill was deemed an "Emergency" measure (?) and rammed through the short session of the Legislature in 15 days, with little opportunity for the citizens of this state to even be aware of it, and certainly with no opportunity to comment. Many legislators I have spoken to knew what the bill was about and had no idea of its ramifications. So, May 8, 2007 to April 18, 2008 is less than one year. Not 15 years.
Candiceanne, really! You are likely a nice person and a loyal citizen of Rumford. I don't know how you can believe so strongly in wind power if you actually research and educate yourself the way you say you do. But keep these delightful diatribes coming! And mangling facts and twisting reality is OK. They are outrageously delightful entertainment!

candiceanne's picture

See for yourself Click BabaraDunkin1's links

I hope that readers will take the time to click on at least one of BarbaraDunkin1’s links to see what they are really about for themselves. The first is about the investigation into the Global Warming Fraud that was uncovered recently and all the emails and the second is the seizure of assets after conviction of an individual with reputed mafia ties that is none of the people listed and the assets included a “local” not a “national” soccer team.

It is unfair to ask the Citizens of Rumford to vote on any Wind Power ordinance when they have not been provided with the education they mandated this committee provide. The Citizens of Rumford are being asked to vote without first being informed on what wind power means in order to determine if they have changed their minds from the straw vote previously taken when they voted in favor of it. Once and only once educated on what wind power means, can the Citizens of Rumford determine what restrictions if any they wish to place on it. Once and only once that has been achieved, can they examine and evaluate any proposed ordinance and make an informed decision voting up or down. There is a process that must take place which must not be circumvented to do otherwise is to do a great disservice to the citizens and the economic future of Rumford.

BarbaraDurkin1's picture

Four people arrested, seven wind farms and 12 companies under se

Italian Wind developer and soccer club owner Oreste Vigorito head of Italian Vento Power Corporation IVPC was arrested in operation "Gone With the Wind".

Brian Caffyn was the original investor in IVPC. Brian also seeded Cape Wind Associates, LLC (as Wind Management, LLC that became EMI), and Brian Caffyn is co-founder of UPC with Peter Gish. UPC changed their name to First Wind in May 2008.

"...And at Falck’s windfarm at Buddusò – Alà dei Sardi: “Four people arrested, seven wind farms and 12 companies under sequestration, and ‘that’s the outcome of the operation’ Gone With the Wind ‘for which the magistrate court of Avellino has issued arrest warrants for Oreste Vigorito, 62 years Naples lawyer, administrator and president of IVPC Benevento Calcio; Vito Nicastro, 52 years of Alcamo, Ferdinand Renzulli, 42 years of Avellino, and Vincent Dongarra, 46 years of Enna. Another 11 people were investigated in various capacities for accountability in organized fraud for receiving government grants for the construction of wind farms. Nine of the seized companies are based in Avellino, the other 3 in Sicily.”

http://www.iraq-war.ru/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=223500

IVPC Oreste Vigorito's football club is Benevento Calcio translated to English:
"well wind we kick"
Has the Benevento Calcio soccer club been seized, too?

Police say they've seized Mafia wealth in Sicily
Aug. 14, 2010
The Associated Press

ROME -- Police in Sicily say they've hit at the heart of the financial empire of a convicted Mafia associate, seizing euro800 million (more than $1 billion) in property and businesses, including a clinic for cancer patients and a local soccer team.

The businesses included eight construction companies. Local health mogul Michele Aiello, 53, was convicted of Mafia association, corruption and fraud and sentenced to 15 1/2 years in prison..."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100814/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_mafia_wealth

northwoods_maine's picture

"Like the Dixmont ordinance,

"Like the Dixmont ordinance, the committee's document was quickly labeled anti-wind last month by Neil Kiely of First Wind LLC of Newton, Mass."

No shi_ shakespeare! Neil and his employer (First Wind LLC) are so used to ram-rodding whatever they want down the throats of small town and plantation selectpersons that they just can't believe it one someone actually stands up to them. As one who has personally be lied straight to my face by Mr. Kiely, take anything he says with a grain of salt. He's the worst kind of snake oil salesman. Trust nothing that he says. The state model ordinance is nothing more than a 'red carpet' for wind power developers, don't allow them to introduce that as an ordinance. The citizens of Rumford have spoken and created their own ordinance. Pass it and send Mr. Kiely and his carpetbagging employer packing.

candiceanne's picture

Selectmen declared ordinance "anti-wind"

I was at the workshop at which the unauthorized ordinance was presented to the Rumford Board of Selectmen. Based on your statements, clearly you were not. No one at First Wind labeled the proposed unauthorized ordianance as "anti-wind" members of the Rumford Board of Selectmen and the Town Manager of Rumford did that as did citizens who where there expecting to finally receive the "education" they have been waiting for this committee to provide as mandated. We got an education all right. We learned that certain members of the wind power education committee had taken over and usurped the authority of the planning board and selectmen, gone against the will of the people as clearly expressed by Austrailian Ballot at the polls, had drafted an ordanance and expected the selectmen and uninformed body of voters to give rubber stamp approval to their special interest group driven ordinance.

PenobScot's picture

Subpoenas Served on First Wind/UPC Wind and Noble Environmental

ATTORNEY GENERAL CUOMO LAUNCHES INVESTIGATION INTO WIND POWER COMPANIES' CONDUCT ACROSS UPSTATE NEW YORK
Allegations of Improper Dealings with Public Officials and Anti-Competitive Practices

Subpoenas Served on First Wind/UPC Wind and Noble Environmental Power, LLC

http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2008/jul/july15a_08.html

Blueyes1119's picture

First Wind Wants its Way

Dear Candiceanne, you obviously are a strong advocate of wind power development, so I can understand why you are so upset that a group of citizens might work diligently on an ordinance to guide the siting of huge industrial machines in town. My goodness, they might have concerns for the impact on the health and wellbeing of all the citizens of Rumford by such a development.

First Wind cries foul any time it doesn't get its way and they depend on a chorus of wind advocates to join in. Rumford should tell First Wind to get out of town and have nothing to do with this pitiful company. You are naive if you think that First Wind hasn't been working hard to defeat the citizen's proposed ordinance. The model state ordinance is a sham that allows them to have their way. The expedited wind permitting statute gives them preferential treatment, rolls back environmental protection that would apply to every other development, and strips citizens of their rights to determine what happens in their own town.

Rumford is getting the same treatment that Lincoln got in dealing with First Wind. These masters of manipulation have been after Rumford officials for years. They lie, misrepresent, withhold information, and adopt an attitude of its their way or no way. They look for local welfare via TIF to heap on top of all the other subsidies they get. It is refreshing to see that in just two years there has been a change between the Lincoln and Rumford situations. In Lincoln, the project was made public after six years of secretive meetings and manipulations between First Wind and town officials. By the time the citizens in Lincoln were aware, they were dealing with an application being rammed through. At least in Rumford, the citizens are involved earlier in the process.

The runaway train of the First Wind project in Lincoln Lakes has been stopped for two years by a citizens group. It has caused terrible rifts and hard feelings in the town. This happens in every community where wind developers go. Sadly, it is happening in Rumford, too. The ordinance that came from the citizens' group deserves an up or down vote, seperately, on its own merits. Let the debate be centered around Rumford citizens' vote on that proposal, not the interests of First Wind. Rumford belongs to its citizens, not First Wind.

candiceanne's picture

Committee usurped authority

I apologize for taking so long to respond. It has been a very busy day.

I do not consider myself a strong advocate for wind. I do consider myself a strong advocate for education, truth, honesty and integrity. I believe that when you sign on for a job you should do that job even if you do not agree with everything about it or if you would like to be doing something else. You made a commitment and have an obligation. The people on this committee signed submitted themselves to the Rumford Board of Selectmen for consideration to a committee whose mandate was and remains to advise and educate. This committee was tasked with researching wind power and bringing speakers, experts and information to the selectmen and the citizens to use in making an informed decision as to what if anything they, the citizens wanted for themselves and their town. I resent that individuals submitted their names and accepted appointment to this committee with absolutely no intention of carrying out the mandate of the selectmen and the citizens for this committee, had no intentions of serving in an advisory capacity or of bringing in speakers, experts and information to the selectmen and the citizens to use in making an informed decision. I resent that members of this committee submitted their names and accepted appointment with the single intent of crafting and unauthorized ordinance that would equate to a permanent moratorium on wind power in this community in direct contradiction to the express wishes of the voters at the polls in a previous vote.

Through no help of the wind power advisor committee which was tasked to advise and educate, I have researched and educated myself on wind, unfortunately the majority of voters are unlikely to have the benefit of time and resources I have to do the necessary research and self-education which is why we needed and appointed the committee in the first place. If this committee has legitimate concerns about impact from an industrial wind project on the health and well-being on all the citizenry of Rumford they should have honored their commitment and served as advisors and educators instead of drafting an unauthorized ordinance and asking the citizens to vote in ignorance.

I have not once heard First Wind “cry foul,” in this rogue committee’s handling of things or anything else in or out of Rumford. First Wind offered, in writing, to assist the committee and the committee didn’t even have the common courtesy to acknowledge the letter, in fact, they tried to say First Wind had declined to participate until the letter was produced by the Town, not even First Wind. I have been present at a number of selectmen’s meetings where First Wind representatives have also been present. They show nothing but respect and restraint. They make no attempt to interject, question or comment. At the meetings I have attended, Selectmen have had to speak directly to First Wind and ask them questions to gain their participation. First Wind has gone out of its way not to interfere in Rumford’s business but let Rumford people educate themselves and decide for themselves. Again, if our committee had only done what they were formed and appointed to do our citizens would have had access to information and educational forums.

Blueyes1119, my grandmother used to have a saying when someone said things they knew nothing about, “you talk through a paper gussnufful (sp?)” I say this of you. I work with the selectmen and economic development committee on an ongoing basis on grantwriting, economic development and other projects including TIFs. I assure you First Wind has NOT, I repeat, First Wind has NOT, requested a TIF. Furthermore, based on the economic plan the selectmen and economic development committee have for the Town of Rumford there is no room for a TIF for wind development. In fact, state rules governing TIFs would not permit a TIF to cover a wind power project because of the depleted value of the town and county if they did ask. I expect that First Wind would know a lot more about TIFs than you obviously do if they had any interest and would know that a TIF is not an option.

As for the state’s approval process, I give a lot more credit to the state processes which took 15 years to develop, with 15 years of research and study, with input from lots of stakeholders and scientists than what a handful of individuals (some with a known ax to grind with First Wind) and personal agendas who violated the trust of the selectmen and the citizens of Rumford and didn’t just fail to do the duty they sought and accepted but took those positions to manipulate the citizenry and force their special interest will upon the community developing an unauthorized ordinance in a few months.

In closing, it is not as much that I support wind power per se as I support the right of the Citizens of Rumford to receive the information and educational opportunities they mandated of this committee. I support the right of the Citizens of Rumford to have their will respected; they voted that they supported wind development in a previous Australian Ballot vote. I support the right of the Citizens of Rumford to have a proper ordinance developed by the proper authority, planning board with approval of selectmen using ALL available information to the economic benefit, protection of rights, and preservation of health of all citizens should they, the Citizens of Rumford so dictate. I am adamantly opposed to a special interest steamrolling over the Citizens of Rumford and imposing their will, personal interests and yes, even spite filled vindictiveness upon the Citizens of Rumford and First Wind.

PenobScot's picture

Could someone please explain whether this is cause for concern?

Could someone please explain whether this is cause for concern?

Ex-partner of Boston wind exec charged

Sunday, November 15, 2009 (Source: Boston Herald)

By Christine McConville, Boston Herald

Nov. 15--The Massachusetts native who helped found controversial wind-energy developers Cape Wind and First Wind expressed surprise late last week at news that his one-time partner in a separate wind-energy company in Italy has been arrested and charged with fraud.

"I read about it in the papers, and I was very surprised," Brian Caffyn said from Hong Kong, where he is now building wind-energy farms in China and the Philipines.

"I know of no fraud with (former partners) Oreste (Vigorito) and IVPC," said Caffyn, a Cape Cod native and Babson College graduate.

IVPC is Italian Vento Power Corp., a company that Caffyn, 50, once owned with Vigorito, a well-known Italian soccer club president. The pair worked together for seven years in Italy and even lived next door to each other for a time.

Last week, the Italian finance police arrested Vigorito, his Sicilian business associate Vito Nicastri and two others, according to the Financial Times. Eleven others were charged in a probe dubbed "Gone with the Wind" that began in 2007, the Financial Times said.

The group is accused of committing fraud by obtaining millions in public subsidies to build wind farms that either never worked properly or did not supply the promised amounts of energy, the Financial Times reported.

Vigorito has no connection to Cape Wind or First Wind.

Caffyn, who has amassed a fortune starting wind-energy companies, sold his interest in Cape Wind in 2002. He sold his interest in IVPC in 2005, according to First Wind spokesman John Lamontagne. Caffyn remains a shareholder and director with First Wind, Lamontagne wrote in an e-mail statement.

Last February, as part of a parallel probe, Italy's anti-Mafia police arrested eight others, including an alleged Mafia boss, and accused them of corruption in a wind farm project, the Financial Times reported.

According to corporate filings, Caffyn was a founding partner in Cape Wind, the wind-energy turbine project slated for Nantucket Sound. He went on to establish UPC Wind Management LLC, now known as First Wind.

In the United States, where the Department of Energy has recently set aside $100 billion in cash grants for the clean-energy sector, both Cape Wind and First Wind have been accused by critics of taking advantage of pro-alternative energy programs for financial gain.

In 2006, the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University undertook the most comprehensive review yet of Cape Wind's public subsidies.

"What we found was quite remarkable," David Tuerck, the institute's executive director, said at the time. "Cape Wind stands to receive subsidies worth $731 million, or 77 percent of the cost of installing the project and 48 percent of the revenues it would generate. The policy question that this amount of subsidy raises is whether the project's benefit is worth the huge public subsidies that the developer gets."

Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rogers said the wind farm would only receive government monies after it is up and working, and meeting certain production criteria.

"It's all performance-based," he said.

In September, after First Wind affiliates received $115 million in federal stimulus money, U.S. Rep. Eric J. Massa (D-N.Y.) wrote to President Barack Obama, calling the grants "very alarming" and saying the company "abused the public trust.

"No electricity has been produced for sale out of the projects," but the company "has already collected production rewards for non-existent energy," Massa told Obama.

First Wind CEO Paul Gaynor, a former Enron executive, responded in a letter to Obama, saying that First Wind's New York wind farms have produced 133,370 megawatt hours of clean, renewable energy. "We are proud of our work in New York and appreciate the grants we received," he wrote.

Caffyn, whose 2007 divorce records show he amassed an $82 million fortune building wind farms around the world, said late last week that all the completed projects he has been involved with were properly constructed and met the promised performance standards.

cmcconville@bostonherald.com

http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3638058

candiceanne's picture

Are you serious?

Is this a cause for concern? Are you serious? Did you read the date on the article? Did you read the article? Did you Google or yahoo search to see if there was more information like for example there actually was a prosecution, a plea agreement or the thing was just dropped? My guess, no. You like so many in the anti-wind movement are so desperate that (I got to use the pun) you are tilting at windmills. For starters this arrest was in Naples, Italy in November 2009. That would make it nearly a year ago and there has been absolutely nothing since, which means, given the way Italian law works, the case was dropped or in US terms dismissed.

Next, while someone really did a lot of leg work to try to get some mud to stick on US wind power concerns, the charges had nothing to do with individuals involved in US projects and that is clearly and specifically stated. The author of the article was smart enough not to risk being sued. Also the individuals in the US who had business dealings in the past with this individual last had dealings with them in 2002 and 2005. That is to say 8 and 5 years ago respectively. These people were not involved in any wrong doing this person was arrested in conjunction with which is also clearly stated. Again, the author knew better than to suggest otherwise by omission and risk being sued. This is an attempt at guilt by association.

PenobScot, I am sure if I snooped around among your family, acquaintances, neighbors, business associates, employees if you ever own a business, fellow workers in your entire employment history and those who ever worked for those employers before or since I could come up with a pedophile or two or three, tax cheats, drunk drivers, perhaps an armed robber or two, an arsonist, a wife or child beater or four or five. Does that make you any of these things? NO! Of course not. No more than the person in this article being arrested in Italy a year ago is any indication of wrong doing by people who invested in the same projects unrelated to the arrest 5 and 8 years before and that is all a partner is, an investor in a private, not publicly traded company.

And you wonder why I and so many others no longer take anti-wind power activists seriously. You throw your credibility away with stuff like this.

PenobScot's picture

A Business Model of Lie, Cheat and Corrupt

What we need is for our state Attorney General, Janet Mills, to make wind companies sign a Code of Conduct. That's exactly what they signed in NY State, after their Attorney General began investigating them for bribery and intimidation. That investigation continues.

Also in NYS, former US Congressman Eric Massa (D) has requested of President Obama that a stimulus gift (a total of $115 MILLION by the way including the Maine portion), be revoked and has called for a GAO investigation of a business model of "LIE, CHEAT AND CORRUPT".

It's all in the following letter:

http://api.ning.com/files/suPVazrTZIhW2Bp-5Wi9xXN*SaMeTyrn3OxF1wSNaOQ_/M...

verified

ANCESTORS

If our ancestors would have thoughts the way our Wind Advisory committee are thinking and trying to promote. We would not have a mill in the center of our town right now. Think of the emissions that have covered our town over the years. Wind is clean energy production. And when it comes to a vote. Which it shouldn't have come to this point in this manner. It should be done during a regular election time ,June or Noember at not at any special election date,

candiceanne's picture

This Wind Committee appointed

This Wind Committee appointed by the selectmen was to be an advisor committee providing education and bringing in resources to educate the selectmen and the citizens so we could all make informed decisions. Land Use, zoning and such is a function of the planning board which has experience in this and any ordinance on wind should have come out of the Planning Board, not this committee with no authority, mandate or request to do so. This wind committee has not done the job it was established and mandated to do, educated and bring in resources to educate the selectmen and the citizens and they are demanding we do what we by establish the committee where seeking to avoid, voting on an ordinance uninformed. This committee started out with some diversity in membership but the anti-wind contingent quickly made sure only they had a say, education was elliminated from the process and the entire mission became producing an ordinance that would constitute a permanent moratorium on wind power in Rumford. The goal and objective of this group has and is to have force a vote on an ordiance that will achieve this permanent moratorium and prevent any education of the citizenry or offer any alternative. They do not want you to know what you are voting on, its ramifications in terms of potential legal costs, how it could be modified and applied to your future activities, those of your employer or future employers, and certainly not the truth about wind and how it effects possible wind development in Rumford. If these people had any confidence in you and they had any confidence in the validity of their ordinance wouldn't they have educated you as mandated and want you to understand what they are demanding you vote on? You have to ask youself, what is their real motive in this? And you have to doubt it is your best interest they have at heart.

dj_inda_am's picture

This is typical

of Mark Belanger. He isn't involved in helping find a solution, but complains about something and tries to stop it when it doesn't include what he wants. What else would an advisory committee for a wind ordinance do besides draft an ordinance? Brad Adley was right, the Selectmen can tweak it. They hold the ultimate authority for determining what goes on the ballot ans what doesn't. Time to step up Mark. If you don't like what it says change it and convince the other selectmen. If they don't like your suggestions don't pout, or worse file an injunction, when you don't get your way. Respect the will of the board.

verified

Advisory Only

Mr. Belanger you are correct. It was set up for advisrory only. Not to write an ordinance. There were two selectboard members and the town manager on this committee that allowed the committee to overstep once again what it was originally set up to do. Another look at special interest people being put on a committee to get what they want and not what the people want. Remember what the tally was for the non-binding poll. Windpower was favored Mr. Buccina.

dj_inda_am's picture

The only missing

from this meeting is DiConzo threatening to take people outside! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Mark Belanger is absolutely correct. He will stir up crap.

verified

The Only Thing missing

is you dj still hiding the closet afraid to come out so people will recognize you and know why you are on the bandwagon of so much discontent . You should change your hidden self to dj_inda_dark closet. That's what's wrong with the blogs. It gives cowards more safety. They don't want people to see who they really are because it gives the people the knowledge to realize why they are the way they are. Disgruntled , vindictive, lonely people who just like to cause trouble.

my view's picture
verified

Rules

Brad say's he will play by the rules from either ordinance, since when has he played by the rules in the past?

I thought this was a selectman's meeting sounds like a shouting match among a bunch of kids trying to change the rules mid-stream. This shows what the caliber is of our elected board.

candiceanne's picture

The rules where changed by

The rules where changed by the appointed "educational and advisor commitee" which was made up of people that desired to do neither. The goal and object of the majority of the members of that committe from the outset was to write behind closed doors with as much secrecy as possibly and no educaton then get passed an ordinance that would equate to a permanent moratorium on wind power in Rumford no matter the cost to the community and its citizens.

Spirit of the Mountains's picture

Bribery advisory

Did anyone see the "advisory" sent out last month by Bernstein Shur?

Shana Cook Mueller represents wind companies. I wonder what prompted the issuance of the advisory?

ADVISORY
Bribery and Threats in Official and Political Matters
– Duty of Public Officials to Report –
By Shana Cook Mueller & Philip Saucier | August 2nd, 2010
It is commonly known that it is a crime to bribe or threaten a public official with the intent to
influence a decision. Many people may be unaware, however, that a public official may also be
guilty of a crime if he or she does not report the threat or unaccepted bribe to a law
enforcement officer. The punishment for the failure to report a bribe or threat with the intent
to influence is the same as making the threat or bribe itself and can carry up to a 5-year
prison sentence. Title 17-A M.R.S.A. Sections 601-603.
Thankfully, in Bernstein Shur’s long tenure representing municipal governments, instances of
threats or bribery have arisen on an extremely rare basis. However, it is important for public
officials to understand their obligations to report and the potential criminal responsibility
associated with such circumstances. If you have any questions regarding this statute or
others, please contact Phil Saucier at psaucier@bernsteinshur.com and 207-228-7160 or
Shana Cook Mueller at smueller@bernsteinshur.com and 207-228-7134.

http://www.bernsteinshur.com/files-publications/08%2002%20Municipal%20Of...

candiceanne's picture

Bribe to "Law Enforcement Official"

Mountain nice try. I guess you are trying to suggest that some pro-wind power individual or group, perhaps First Wind has attempted or has bribed Brad Adley or Mark Belanger into putting up the alternate proposal. Your attempt sucks, unless you are Tron whose reading and reading comprehension has been demonstrated to be, well about kindergarten level, this post isn't going to do it. This notice was advising Town Managers, Mayors, Police Chiefs, Fire Chiefs, Selectmen, City Councilors, etc that they are legally bound to report any attempts to bribe or threaten law enforcement officials as specifically stated. Law enforcement officials would include such folks as police officers, code enforcement, and fire marshalls for example. This has nothing to do with anyone having attempted to bribe or threaten any selectmen to effect wind power ordinances in favor of wind power. Nice try though and really shows the desperation of the anti-wind folk who can not make a case on merit.

candiceanne's picture

I called and spoke with Shana

I called and spoke with Shana Cook Mueller personally, very nice and professional. As I surmised in my previous posting the advisor was prepared as for their municipal clients which makes up the bulk of the practice as a routine bulletin. It had absolutely nothing to do with wind power. Also I was fascinated to learn this same attempt to distort was used in a Penobscot County paper in a post on a wind power related article also insinuating that government officials who disagreed with or even dare to question the anti-wind power contingents were on the take. As I have previously stated these folks seem to have gone beyond desperation being unable to make their case on merit.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...