Group opposing casino in Oxford launches campaign Web site

BANGOR — The campaigns for and against a proposed casino in Oxford heated up online again Tuesday.

A group opposing the ballot measure aimed at bringing a resort casino to Oxford has set up a campaign Web site, according a release issued by the group, Citizens Against the Oxford Casino.

The Web site, baddealformaine.com, "will inform Maine citizens about the problems with the proposal, and will give those who agree that the Oxford proposal is flawed, a place to join the coalition," the release stated.

“This coalition came together just a couple of months ago to oppose the referendum on the Oxford casino,” Dan Cashman, a spokesman hired to represent the group, said in a prepared statement. “In that short time, we have been talking with people throughout the state about the details of the proposal – and once voters see the loopholes and unfair advantages associated with it, they tend to agree that this proposal is simply a bad deal for Maine.”

The group Cashman represents is largely funded by the Pennsylvania-based Penn National Gaming, owners of Bangor's Hollywood Slots, currently Maine's only casino.

Proponents of the casino plan, the Black Bear Entertainment political action committee, have spent more than $515,000 on their campaign, according to the most recent state campaign finance reports available online.

  Black Bear is a group of local and Maine business people including which is financially backed by several prominent Maine business people, including Suzanne and Rupert Grover of Norway and Stephen Barber of Cape Elizabeth.

Opponent PACs, including Citizens Against the Oxford Casino and Casinos No!, have spent an estimated $62,000 opposing the measure so far.

Among the reasons Citizens Against the Oxford Casino cite for the opposition is the unlevel playing field that would be created by passing  Question 1 on the Nov. 2 ballot.

If passed, Oxford would be the only gaming facility in the state allowed to operate table games. The coalition says that kind of monopoly would not only cost Maine jobs, but it would also send a message to future investors that Maine is not open for business, Cashman said.

The Oxford proposal contains language that would not allow any other gaming facilities to open within a 100 mile radius of Oxford. That distance would shut the door on new jobs or growth in the gaming industry throughout all of southern Maine, most of western Maine, portions of midcoast Maine, central Maine, and eastern Maine, Cashman said.

“There are lots of numbers being thrown around about new potential visitors to Oxford because of a casino,” said Kerrie Tripp, executive director of the Bangor Convention and Visitors Bureau, which is a member of the coalition. “But knowing the tourism industry from an insider’s perspective, I can tell you that this type of a facility will not draw people in just because it exists."

Tripp said other New England states and Canadian provinces have recently approved new casinos changing the landscape for Maine in that industry. 

"It has been approved in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New Brunswick. Maine is soon going to be surrounded by states with gaming facilities," Tripp said. "So there needs to be more of a tourism infrastructure in place to draw people to a gaming facility. Right now, I’m not sure Oxford is prepared for it.”

The group also charged that the Oxford casino would cost the state tax revenue as the language creating it gives that group a better tax rate than Bangor's Hollywood Slots.

Randy Seaver, a campaign worker for Black Bear, said Tuesday that they were not "going to get into the weeds" with their opponents but did issue a short and terse statement.

“We’re not surprised that the opposition is attempting to distort the facts of this campaign," the Black Bear Entertainment release stated. "But we’re confident that Maine voters understand the importance of this issue and that they are excited about the approval of Question 1, which will provide a significant boost to Maine’s economy by creating more than 2,700 permanent jobs and generating at least $60 million in state revenue—without raising taxes.”

That PAC's web site is www.takechargemaine.com.

sthistle@sunjournal.com


 

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

look behind the curtain

This so called coalition is a ruse on the Maine voters by a billion dollar out of state company Penn National trying to hold onto a gaming monoploy in Maine. They spent 10's of millions in Ohio to kill casino comptetition and then came back a year later and spent 10's of millions again and passed legislation to award themselves 2 casino's. Don't fall for this Penn National sham. Thier assertions about the Oxford Referendum are baseless and factually incorrect as was the LSJ artical on this story.

Kevin Saisi's picture

Wet Diaper Movement

Are we going to let Hollywood Slots wet diaper movement sway us to what they want? Of course there needs to be limitations on competition, if not, a casino could open in a nearby community. Common sense is essential here folks. Anything that is said by this anti-casino group is worthless because they work for the competition. Let the people decide without the politics.

Fred Stone's picture

Contact link

Why isn't there a contact link so you can comment on why you support a casino in Oxford, or are they afraid of the truth?

Jeff Douglas's picture

they should call themselves

they should call themselves the "we dont want jobs in oxford county" group.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...