I didn’t take a mortgage for more than I could afford. I didn’t conceive children that I couldn’t support. I didn’t run up credit card bills to the point I couldn’t repay them.
I didn’t run a major financial company into the ground making risky investments. I didn’t bankrupt a major automotive company with extremely high labor and benefit costs. I did not promise health care to everyone.
I do earn more than I spend, live within my means and pay off my debt. I do provide for my family. I do work. I work far away from my family. I do see them once every four to six weeks. I do miss them.
I do. So I provide for those who didn’t, or don’t.
President Barack Obama said, “Share the wealth.” What he is saying is, “Get up early, work hard, and the government will redistribute your efforts and the results of your good decisions with others who haven’t made good decisions.”
I am troubled when the executive directors of Community Concepts and Western Maine Community Action receive $169,000 and $99,000, respectively, per year in compensation to create dependence on government programs. And from what I have seen, individuals receiving state or federal assistance have far more gadgets and leisure time than I do.
So many have worked hard and sacrificed, only to have their efforts squandered by those professing compassion and social justice while profiting greatly at our expense.
We will remain silent and politically correct no more.
Mike Wells, Wilton

You could vote Republicans
You could vote Republicans in so the can take your money and give it to corporations and the rich. While they attach the poor and less fortunate while they get sick because they can't afford healthcare but we are all relieved your doing ok.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Awesome
Mr Wells, Slam Dunk, right on....we have a winner. Concerned kd......the same. Both unanswerable. Our public employees now have us out numbered, so.....they vote for their raises and pick our pockets. Well, for the retired cops, and those who post on this message board from disabled or retired wisdom.....there is no more money. It's gone. When foreigners stop buying our bonds, you had better hope you have at least a partime job. I need someone to snow blow my walkways or mow my lawns. The people you support in politics are digging a hole underneath you. WE see it, thats why we are hanging onto OUR cash.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Ahhhhhhh yes the old standby...
greed is good. I can put you in touch with the guy that mows the Mechanic Falls cemetery, you two I feel have the same anger problems and I believe you would work well together. If you "really" are "too lazy" to mow your own lawn that is. LMAO!!! You done been refudiated, youbetcha.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I feel bad for your family.
I feel bad for your family.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.redistribution of wealth
Here's your redistribution of wealth: "The top-earning 20 percent of Americans — those making more than $100,000 each year — received 49.4 percent of all income generated in the U.S., compared with the 3.4 percent earned by those below the poverty line, according to newly released census figures. That ratio of 14.5-to-1 was an increase from 13.6 in 2008 and nearly double a low of 7.69 in 1968." http://yhoo.it/b7k7n8
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (11)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.he 49.4% isn't stolen or
he 49.4% isn't stolen or given to them. The vast majority get it the old fashioned way. They EEEEEAAAAAAARRRRRNNN it. The penalties on hard work, perseverance and ingenuity are what is driving the economy into the ground. When the country was young there was no safety net. People did what they had to do. Why are there migrant workers from Mexico and Jamaica harvesting Maine's blueberries and apple crops? Because many on welfare think that type of work is beneath them.
Welfare needs to be temporary assistance to people in transition, not a way of life generation after generation.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The 49.4% isn't stolen or
The 49.4% isn't stolen or given to them. The vast majority get it the old fashioned way. They EEEEEAAAAAAARRRRRNNN it. The penalties on hard work, perseverance and ingenuity are what is driving the economy into the ground. When the country was young there was no safety net. People did what they had to do. Why are there migrant workers from Mexico and Jamaica harvesting Maine's blueberries and apple crops? Because many on welfare think that type of work is beneath them.
Welfare needs to be temporary assistance to people in transition, not a way of life generation after generation.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.So freakin' what? Anyone
So freakin' what? Anyone making over a $100 grand a year is probably working his butt off and efficiently managing his/her money. What' wrong with that? What you don't mention is that they paid 80% of the taxes, too. You have to get away from the Food Channel once in a while, Lilly and watch some real news; aka; FOX NEWS CHANNEL.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (14)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.right...
Fox would never report that income disparity is as high as it was back in the 20's - that would involve putting actual objective facts into the mouths of their spokesmodels - which they would never do, of course. The well off keep getting ahead, but the middle class is not benefiting from hard work and increased productivity. Redistribution of income to the top.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The only reason there's
The only reason there's income disparity is that there are now more people than any other time in our history sitting on their asses collecting government checks for not working. 99 weeks of unemployment benefits? Come on.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (7)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.you're right!
You nailed it! Look at all the classifieds in the paper - a gazillion jobs and no applicants! All those people on unemployment? They chose to lose their jobs! And the people that are working? They're getting more overtime than they ever dreamed possible! Quitting your job is the path to unemployment $$$! Wait, what? You can't get unemployment if you quit? Okay, nevermind...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Boy, they sure saw you coming........
Some, no doubt are working their butts off......
Though many of my neighbors are 'Coupon Clippers' and 'Trust Fund Babies' - and they pay other people to manage their money. That's what 'Big Kids' do.
Tennis, anyone???
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Obviously, you're on the
Obviously, you're on the right side of town. Nothing wrong with that, is there? Wouldn't rather be on a tree street in Lewiston, would you?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.There is no wrong side to this Town....
And we've got everything from Single-wide's to Multi-million dollar properties (occasionally next to each other) - One fella sold one of his businesses for 19 Billion, yep, with a 'B' - afew years back.
But I did have to rent my house out on a "Tree" street in Lew-ees-ton for awhile before it sold when I moved here... ;)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Enjoying the Caviar?
Well that must make you one of the privelidged bunch.. Must be nice to reap the benefits of that government pension .. And social security on top of that... It must be good to be old in a time when the government can still afford to write checks.... So while you and your "coupon clipper neighbors" sit there in your spoils of a life of hard work, Why dont you shut up and stop trying to interfere with the younger generation trying to insure the funds will be there when we get old like you..... As things stand now the system will be bankrupt by the time Im your age. Why should I and others of my generation be forced to pay into the Social security system knowing we will never get that money back. Then if we want to be responsible for our own retirement and make investments we will have to pay higher capitol gains taxes thus taking twice the time to make a decent egg to live on in our retirement... The chips are being stacked against the younger generations and to sit here and read your posts using your generation as the example of what to do is rediculous. Why dont you go play your tennis and drink your geritol with Chet and Buffy while enjoying your retirement instead of adding your nonsense to this blog. Its our money, let us decide!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (5)
Agree (14)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.How little you know....
You might be 'Concerned' - but very, very uninformed.
Those of us who have both paid into 'Social Security' and Municipal Pension Funds are penalized by Social Security. It's like putting your money into two banks, and finding you may only draw all of it out of only one, and a fraction out of the other.
I paid into Social Security all the time I was in the Navy/Reserves or self-employed. During my Law Enforcement career I paid into a municipal pension fund. My social security will be significantly offset by what one would normally draw with my contributions. That's what I get for working hard. So I've got wealthy neighbors. I also have poor ones. And you have made your choices. Be-itch, be-itch, be-itch!!
http://legacy.usw.org/usw/program/content/4489.php
"Certain public sector workers are negatively impacted by two provisions contained in the Social Security Act: the Government Pension Offset (GPO) and the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). While originally intended to ensure that public employees were not "unduly enriched," in reality the two provisions cut benefits and result in unjustly penalizing public sector workers. The WEP impacts those public sector workers who were covered by a non-Social Security pension in their employment and also worked in a job that was covered by Social Security by reducing the amount of Social Security that they are eligible for. One USW member has described it as putting money in two banks only to find out that you can't get all your money back out of one of them when needed. The GPO impacts the Social Security survivor benefits for those public sector workers who are covered by a non-Social Security pension in their government employment."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.You're right about Social
You're right about Social Security reducing benefits when there is other income. What a screwing that is.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.AHHH but you still miss my
AHHH but you still miss my point.....Lets just say I am you, in this generation.. All things the same. paid in the same amounts all across the board.Same job,everything the same......Now consider what life would be like if the Social Security wasnt there... AT ALL!!!!! Thats the point..... My generation is expected to work more/harder to get less/nothing in the long run, because social security wont be there..... You should be thankfull for what you have and considerate of those who are paying for it but wont have it when its thier turn to draw from social security....
As its intended social seciurity is set up for me to pay the tab on my fathers social security, as you did for your father..... Now imagine this for a penalty when its your turn to get something back.......THERE IS NO MONEY LEFT SO YOU GET NOTHING!!!!! How would that sound if YOU were penalized like this???? Now imagine if you didnt have a pension on top of social security (like so many other people)..Imagine putting your money in a bank and that bank telling you after 50 years of deposits that you cannot have ANY of your money back because bank costs were too high..... You would be singing a different tune if it were going to happen to you....
No one has accused you of not working hard enough to deserve what you get, but dont tread on me and my generation for trying to insure we get what we are entitled to by being a hard worker too, and paying into the system all of our lives too.....Just like you did....
Ohhh,Just to clarify, None of this is happening because of my choices.... This has occurred due to the poor structure of social security, welfare and social services(of which I had no choice) and that was all decided by your generation... Not mine... So I guess my generation will pay the highest price tag in history for your retirement. And when its our turn--------NOTHING -------. I will Be-itch, and with good reason... So why do you Be-itch?? You have no reason... Your getting yours.... Wanna give it back so I get mine???? No?? Oh then go play tennis and stay out of my retirement planning!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Your point is "Let's just say..."
Sounds like a Glenn Beck Info-mercial.
I haven't pissed in your Wheaties - so why piss in mine???
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.reality
Since current benefits are paid with current contributions, Social Security can't go broke. The money you are paying in now is not yours - it goes to your parents or grandparents. All the fear mongering about Social Security is just a GOP wet dream.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (9)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What do you mean, it can't go
What do you mean, it can't go broke; it IS broke. They've been tapping it with IOU's and not paying them back for 40 years. Since they've turned it into a social welfare program (alcoholism is now a disability, entitiling one to SSI benefits) and there are now barely 3 workers for every recipient, you're damn right it's broke.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Don't want to confuse you youngsters....
'Coupon Clippers' are not little old ladies looking for 50 cents off at Wal-Mart... Here's the definition - I should have remembered it was an archaic term....
http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/53/messages/684.html
"Coupon clipper" also refers to an investor who buys bonds. ~rb
Fewer and fewer of us use that sense of coupon clipper, though, since bonds no longer have coupons to be redeemed. The practice of redeeming coupons was abandoned a couple of decades back, but the description remains. It conjures up a vision of an elderly, wealthy person, living off his/her bond interest.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Where were all these frugal
Where were all these frugal conservatives when the so-called frugal conservatives in Congress permitted us to get into an endless war that has nearly bankrupt the country-well unless you're Blackwater or Haliburton or one of their subsidiaries? Where were all these frugal conservatives when Ronald Reagan, George Bush pushed through their tax cuts without reducing spending? Where were these frugal conservatives who still to this day believe that Ronald Reagan was the great tax cutter (4 tax cuts, BUT 11 tax increases)? Where were all those conservatives who like to complain about NAFTA when it was signed into law under George Herbert Walker Bush?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (14)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Why don't you tell us?
Why don't you tell us?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.ideology
If the GOP ideology hadn't destroyed the economy, there wouldn't be as much need for help as there is.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (26)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.How long are you going to
How long are you going to buzz that saw, Lilly? Your boy's had almost two years, and he still hasn't got a grip on exactly what his job description is.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (16)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.He doesn't have Cheney to tell him what it is.....
Too bad, so sad......
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (5)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Actually, I agree with that.
Actually, I agree with that. Cheney could help him out a lot; as long as they don't go hunting.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Au contraire, mon frere (I
[This comment has been removed by the administrator]
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This comment was removed for
This comment was removed for violating our commenting policy.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Oh...C'mon Patty. Where's
Oh...C'mon Patty. Where's your sense of humor? That joke led late night talk shows for months after it happened...Fine, you're no fun.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Don't you know that the elite
Don't you know that the elite know more than you do? They look down their noses at you like you are a dummy. They believe they have the right to make decisions for you because you are to stupid to make your own. Obama continues to spend even though we have no money. The man is irresponsible. He believe's in taking from those who have more. Crush the corporations. Who cares if anyone has a job. Hate the rich and take away their money. Has you ever heard of a poor person creating a job? Obama is taking away the American dream. He doesn't want personal responsibility. The main point in your letter Mike it that you tell the truth and make sense. The liberals hate that kind of message.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Agree (21)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Jeez, I totally blew my post,
Jeez, I totally blew my post, it should have been directed at Veritas, not Mike Wells.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (9)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.10% of Americans control 90% of the Wealth...
Why do they have you in their back pocket, Gary???
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (8)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yeah, but what percentage of
Yeah, but what percentage of taxes are the 10% paying? That's right; a hell of a lot more than the 90% are paying, considering that 56% of all American households are paying no taxes at all.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Paying no taxes?? You better back that one up!
I can't hardly buy anything without paying sales tax, fuel tax, etc, etc. Anyone who smokes, buys alcohol - you name it pays taxes.
What's this "Pays no taxes B.S?"
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Now, it makes sense
Now, it makes sense
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Mike, you are dead wrong,
Mike, you are dead wrong, because that's EXACTLY what Obama is trying to do. Are you on the receiving end of the wealth distribution, by any chance?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (8)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The problem is
there are no longer enough jobs for everyone. Perhaps one should be grateful for these folks who have no jobs as the one they take could be yours. I know a lot of people who do not work whom have said toy/trinkets etc. Not sure where they get them but the government does not over pay anyone unless you count fat cat bankers and alike. I do work for a living before you bash me. Have since I was 13 and still do 40 +years later. I am grateful for my education and up bringing so I do not have such narrow views of people less fortunate than myself. They are not all bad people or republicans only a percent. And they are not all rich children brought up as such.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (8)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I Call Bullshit!!
Mike Wells writes: "President Barack Obama said, “Share the wealth.” What he is saying is, “Get up early, work hard, and the government will redistribute your efforts and the results of your good decisions with others who haven’t made good decisions.”
No way in Hell, Mike - No Way in Hell.......
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (31)
Agree (8)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It's time you take the
It's time you take the blinders off, my friend. Look around; do you see prosperity and equality?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (11)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Waiting
Ron, I'm waiting for your rebuttal backed up by facts, cites and sources. The basis for Mr. Wells' complaint goes back to October 12, 2008 when Mr. Obama was quoted as saying to Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher (aka Joe the Plumber), "It's not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they've got a chance at success, too… My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. If you’ve got a plumbing business, you’re gonna be better off [...] if you’ve got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybody’s so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody." (source: Wikipedia) So, while Mike may not have quoted then-candidate Obama exactly, I believe that he captured the essence of the now-President's socialist agenda.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Agree (22)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond."Spread the Wealth" is NOT "Share the Wealth"
Too entirely different concepts. It's a 'Capitalist Concept" that if businesses invest and hire, the economy moves around. They're sitting on money now like fat hogs, stifling what they could be moving.
And right now, American Corporations are not 'Spreading the Wealth' by hiring.
And there are those of us who worked on farms during the summers to know what "Shidt-Spreaders" were. Not a 'Sharer".....
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/story/print?guid=D72FA6C8-C26D-11DF-BA8...
"Sept. 17, 2010, 12:12 p.m. EDT
U.S. companies keeping cash on sidelines
Households continue to slash debt as net wealth declines, Fed finds
By Jeffry Bartash, MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) – American companies are still holding onto record sums of cash stored, a decision that reflects their anxiety about the health of the U.S. economy and at the same time contributes to the weakness.
Net household wealth also fell for the first time in a year, reflecting lower stock prices and a sharp drop in home values, according to the latest quarterly “flow of funds” report issued by the central bank.
The Federal Reserve on Friday reported that nonfinancial companies held $1.845 trillion in cash and short-term assets at the end of the second quarter, just a faction below a record $1.846 trillion in the first three months of the year. The first-quarter figure was the highest sum recorded since the central bank began record keeping in 1952.
Companies are reluctant to invest heavily until they see more evidence that the U.S. recovery is accelerating. Yet a high U.S. jobless rate, tepid consumer demand and sluggish export growth are acting as strong headwinds."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (9)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Extend the tax cuts, repeal
Extend the tax cuts, repeal oBAMa care, abolish cap and trade, insert the fair tax, and you'll see the economy take off and unemployment drop beyond your wildest dreams. Very simple solutions, but no one on either side of the aisle has the 'nads to do it. So, here we are, instead, p*****' and whining, and being led down the path to Perdition by a community organizer who's been educated way beyond his level of intelligence, and doesn't know a spread sheet from a racing program.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (8)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Obama care doesn't go into effect until 2014....
Like that's hurting the economy???
Tell the companies to start spending some of the 1.8 Trillion they're sitting on. Or tax them out of it.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.tax cuts
The tax cuts have been in effect for about 10 years now, how many jobs have they created? What? Worst recession in decades?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Confused Veritas,
Do you agree with Mr. Wells or or not?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Agree (9)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Right on Mike.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (8)
Agree (29)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.