Program we loved to hate finally expires

The notorious TARP, the bailout of banks, insurance companies and automakers is finally finished.

It expires today.

And the final accounting is going to disappoint some very angry people: It wasn't so big. It did a lot of good. And it may even turn a profit.

It was, in short, a big government solution to a horrendous problem — and it worked.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced agreement on a key part of the repayment last week in a recap of the program — a plan for the insurance giant AIG to repay, over time, the $70 billion it received.

That comes atop a year of repayment deals with banks and automakers.

Popularly thought of as a $700 billion loss for the American taxpayer, Geithner said the program is likely to break even or even earn taxpayers a profit.

You will recall that the "bailouts" started in 2008 during the administration of George W. Bush, a Republican.

And they began only after the carnage that resulted when the government allowed the investment bank Lehman Brothers to fail, bringing the entire banking system to the brink of collapse.

President Barack Obama and a Democratic Congress picked up where the Republicans had left off, authorizing the $700 billion program to prop up the system.

Although many seem to now have amnesia about that period, some economists were predicting a second Great Depression. Something had to be done, and TARP was that something.

While $700 billion is still bandied about, $387 billion was actually disbursed.

Financially, the program was a winner. Politically, a loser.

The picture of irresponsible Wall Street bankers getting bailed out while ordinary Americans lost their homes is impossible to erase.

It wasn't fair. The ship was sinking and only the captain and crew — the people who steered the boat into the iceberg — were rescued.

Millions of other Americans were left to drown in mortgage debt and unemployment, and the ugly process is still unfolding.

It's tough to put a positive spin on that, other than arguing that without TARP, it could have been far worse.

And, yes, those who voted for the program — including a variety of Republicans — have paid, or will pay, the price at the polls.

The New York Times interviewed one of those people last week, "Bailout Bob" Bennett as he became known in Utah, a four-term Republican who lost his seat in the primary.

Bennett remembers people "screaming" at him that he had "saddled our children and grandchildren with $700 billion" in debt.

"My career is over," he told the Times. "But I do hope that we can get the word out that TARP, number one, did save the world from a financial meltdown and, number two, did so in a manner that, I believe, won't cost the taxpayer anything."

In a chaotic, crisis situation, TARP turned out to be the right thing to do.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

sandra2's picture

So, let me get this straight,

So, let me get this straight, the bailouts were Bush's and the Republicans idea, the Democrats just continued them, and they saved the country.

And tron, xyz and widestance agree.... very interesting...

citygirl's picture

without TARP anyone know what

without TARP anyone know what would've happened to the banks? They would've demanded that people repay their mortage notes in full, most of us do NOT have that money in our back pockets. The banks would've eventually ended up bankrupt and a full on depression would've ensued. It may not have been a perfect solution but it worked.

Fred C's picture

TARP worked

and the ROI was enormous when we include the avoided meltdown and its effects.

The only problem was that it was too small and that has been one cause of the slow recovery.

cobbguy's picture

Great argument...

Hows about providing some reasons not to?

WideStanceRepublican's picture

That's what happens when you are a teahadist

Reality intrudes on your idiocy and proves you wrong. Reality has a distinctly liberal bent. Being a SJ editorial writer must be a pain in the arse given that!

Has the Sun Journal editorial board ever been right about anything?

CommonSense's picture

If you believe Geithner, I

If you believe Geithner, I have a bridge across the Atlantic for sale.

cranky yankee's picture

It's amazing how many people

It's amazing how many people CHOOSE to be ignorant of the facts. The people who blame TARP on the Obama administration are the same ones who still believe NAFTA to be a Clinton administration deal. Funny thing about that-NAFTA was signed by President George H.W. Bush, Mexican President Salinas, and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1992. The impetus for NAFTA actually began with President Ronald Regan, who campaigned on a North American common market. In 1984, Congress, with a Republican controlled Senate, passed the Trade and Tariff Act. This is important because it gave the President "fast-track" authority to negotiate free trade agreements, while only allowing Congress the ability to approve or disapprove, not change negotiating points.

candiceanne's picture

Isn't this the same fool who

Isn't this the same fool who has been trying to convince us the recession ended in June of 2009?

tron's picture

And do YOU have proof

to the contrary? Didn't think so. Go!

Pericles's picture

Fool?

I don't think anyone is to blame other then yourself for not understanding what a recession is and how it is measured. A recession is not a catch all term for high unemployment or economic malaise. A recession is two straight quarters of GDP shrinkage. The last quarter in which the GDP shrank ended in June 2009. That does not mean "happy days are here again" or that everyone gets a job. Growth has been sluggish since then, but there has been growth. I recognize that Fox News wanted to exploit people's ignorance for political benefit, but you do not have to go along. Ignorance is a voluntary state.

tron's picture

Doesn't matter, FOX News? and

the talk radio commentators will claim some sort of number fudging and a vast liberal conspiracy to minimize the effects of TARP on the poor grandchildren. Those leeches never stop.

xyz's picture

Ha...ROFLMAO this is precious...

"And the final accounting is going to disappoint some very angry people: It wasn't so big. It did a lot of good. And it may even turn a profit.
It was, in short, a big government solution to a horrendous problem — and it worked."

Yes we know who you are talking about, the T"Baggers that's who. You know the ones with the funny hats and knickers, who call themselves "patriots"???? with no proof they have done a thing for this country. Other than biatch, and whine.

Advertisement