Allow the voters to decide tax reform

In the last days of the legislative session, when the tax reform bill LD 1495 was placed before the Senate, I rose to make this statement, "I had longer to read a greeting card than I had this 34-page bill of complex tax code change."

I went on to plead with the majority party to give members of the Senate time to read the bill. The majority leader, Sen. Phil Bartlett countered, "members could read the summary of the bill if they wanted." Since that day, I, along with hundreds of volunteers have launched a citizen's veto to reject this complex law.

Here's why:

A sales tax expansion on the elderly

According to Maine Revenue Services, about 300,000 Maine residents do not earn enough money to file an income tax return. Elderly on fixed incomes like Social Security make up the vast majority of this group. Expanding the sales tax as this plan proposes to labor on auto repair, lawn and garden, meals and lodging tax, appliance repair, etc. will impact this group significantly.

LD 1495 has a $50 credit for individuals in this group, but according to Jerome Gerard, director of Maine Revenue Services, in order to get it, one must file an income tax form and request the rebate. MRS estimates, at best, 50 percent will apply. This number seems overly optimistic. Even more disturbing, this means that supporters of LD 1495 knew at the time of the bill's passage that nearly 150,000 elderly on a fixed income would see a significant sales tax increase with no tax relief.

MRS even factored this tax increase and new revenue in their fiscal note. MRS estimates that of the so-called $54 million in exported taxes, $5.7 million will not be claimed by Maine residents.

Add the 150,000 elderly to the 87,000 other taxpayers MRS estimates will pay higher net income and sales taxes under the plan, and first year impact of LD 1495 is that 237,000 — or nearly one-fifth of Mainers — will pay higher taxes.

The effect of delayed indexing 

The old income tax law had yearly inflation adjustments to both the tax brackets and the standard deduction based on the Consumer Price Index, which has averaged more than 2.5 percent every year since 2003.

LD 1495 eliminates indexing of the tax credits and other tax calculations until 2014. According to MRS, this will cost the average taxpayer between $18 and $50. Indexing is cumulative; by 2013 the impact will rise to $54 to $150 in higher taxes per-taxpayer.

The MRS report estimates 665,629 Maine taxpayers will save on average $81 under the bill. But, if a group of 4,456 taxpayers with income over $333,338 are removed from the equation, the average tax cut drops to $39. That leaves 661,173 taxpayers with an average tax reduction of $39 in the first year. Delaying the indexing erodes the $39 in years 2011-2013. By 2013, assuming a 2.5 percent inflation factor, the $39 average tax decrease becomes a $37 tax increase.

What's the small business impact?

Each of the vast categories of newly taxed services represent thousands of sole proprietors and small businesses that will now have to collect sales taxes and administer the new paperwork and collection, as well as face compliance audits from MRS.

Supporters of reform point to an exemption in the law for small businesses that earns less than $5000. This sounds good, but most small businesses have no idea whether they will earn the $5000. They will be forced to make a decision in the start of the earning season, cap their earnings or collect sales taxes. What happens if they collect the sales tax and then don't reach the cap?

According to MRS, state law requires businesses that collect, but don't reach the cap, must either remit the collected tax to MRS or return the tax to their customers. Good luck with the latter.

Obviously, much is still to be learned about this very complicated law. What harm is done by placing this plan before Maine people on next June's ballot and provide them with time to learn more about it or is that what supporters are afraid of?

Sen. David Trahan, R-Waldoboro, is spokesman for Still Fed up with Taxes. E-mail: dptrahan@midcoast.com.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Senator's picture

Tron, Your logic is, "better

Tron,
Your logic is, "better a disaster than nothing at all." Are the points in the column true or not. If they are, are you saying Democrats support the bill, even though these points are true. As far as ideas go, it is my experience that individuals of all politics have good ideas and we should all be willing to listen, but in reality at the statehouse it is often about who gets credit. Either this bill is bad or it is ok, which is it? Deflecting the points in the column by trying to label the opposition as just saying no doesn't work with me. The points are very specific, which do you dispute?

tron's picture

There you go, again, using

There you go, again, using hyperbole. I never said this bill was a disaster, just that it wasn't perfect. But, again, you go putting words into my mouth. Told you not to do so. You're also stating your interpretations as facts, and I disagree. I'm still waiting for your better solution. I cannot listen if you're not speaking. Rarely is any piece of legislation all good or all bad. So let's hear your solutions, and I'll be certain to give you all the credit you desire.

Senator's picture

I am suprised with the post

I am suprised with the post by Tron. Your defense of the plan is opponents don't have one so just shut up. I wonder if Custers comments were similar just before he got scalped.
Tron, are you saying it is ok to tax the elederly on a fixed income to give the rich more money. Are you saying that the point about most tax relief in the first year for the average person will evaporate and wil become a tax increase later is false?
Are you disputing the fact that the rich get a windfall on the backs of the working class and the elderly?
If so, show the facts. Are you saying small business should stop complaining and start collecting taxes?
As far as the inability to read the bill, I was in the House Chamber when the bill was placed on House members desks, it was seconds before the bill was taken up. If no one, except Piotti and his circle saw the bill, is his good process? Are you defending it? If you are, obviously you have never served with those who have no problem tucking special treatment amendments into a bill. It is my experience, every bill needs an assessment before it is passed. Yes, many versions of tax reform have been bantered about, so have bills of every sort and issue, should the Legislature wave all future public hearing on bills that have failed because a previous Legislature had a simlar bill?
This bill, if it gets on the balllot, it will be shreaded for the bad policy it is, just pray opponents don't get the signatures.

tron's picture

Senator, I resent your

Senator, I resent your putting words into my mouth, then condemning me for it. I don't disagree that this isn't the perfect bill, but what do YOU have that's better? All your party does is tear down EVERY attempt of the majority without EVER putting forth your won ideas. You go to generalities about cutting taxes but never where. You propose automatic tax reductions, but never where they accompanying cuts in services are going to be. You want the credit for reduce taxation, BUT never the blame for the ensuing hardships. Give us a complete package and you'd be surprise at the support you might receive.

aadimillo's picture

Albert A. DiMillo, Jr. To

Albert A. DiMillo, Jr.

To Tron,
I am a long-time democrat, a retired CPA and corporate tax director with over 30 years of tax experience and I am working (without pay) with Senator Trahan on repeal. If you want to know the real facts about this law go to www.mainedemocratstaxrefiorm.org. With regard to a better plan, I meet with Rep. Piotti over 18 months ago and voiced my concerns over the last attempt at tax reform and offered my help to draft a fair tax reform package. For over 12 months Rep. Piotti said in several E-Mails to me that he would get me involved as he said in his 3/8/08 E-mail to me "Thanks for your info. I truly appreciate it. (I'm for anything that points out holes and helps us make a product better." Rep. Piotti met with me in late March 2009, only to tell me that he had a new bill and hoped I would like it. I didn't and testified against it a few days later in April of 2009. At that hearing and many times after that through the law passing on June 12, 2009, I suggested ways to make the bill better. The answer is they did not want any input from anyone. What you should be asking is why did all the Democrats (except for 5) vote on for a bill they did not read and clearly did not understand.

tron's picture

So besides throwing a wrench

So besides throwing a wrench into this plan, what is YOUR solution? Oh, right, after years of carping and complaining you don't have one. Except to say no to every proposal that comes along. For every action there's a reaction, so your plea to "just cut taxes" rings hollow because you never offer where they cuts are to be made, just to make them. Honestly, as sick as I am of higher taxes, I'm even sicker of people like you who do NOTHING for this state except drag it down everything it tries something different. Get a real plan that can be supported, then gripe!! Oh, you didn't have time to read the bill? Well this plan has been bandied about for over two years, so maybe you should go back to school and learn to read!

Advertisement