SABATTUS — Local Boy Scout leaders fear the latest tree-cutting at Camp Gustin could signal the end of a 60-year tradition of wilderness camping at the 130-acre site.
Not only will the aggressive cutting make it impossible for a true wilderness camping experience, it might be the the first step toward readying the property for sale, the scouting volunteers say.
The head of the group that oversees Gustin and other camps for the Scouts says the cutting is routine and unrelated to any possible sale of the camp.
The fate of the expansive, undeveloped land fronting Loon Pond is expected to be the subject of next month's board meeting of the Pine Tree Council, the organization that oversees scouting in southern Maine.
A year ago, a council subcommittee floated the idea of selling the property and got a chilly reception from scouting folks in the Lewiston area.
The council has struggled in recent years with money matters, including nearly $1 million of debt for its headquarters built in Portland five years ago. Unlike last year, the council managed to finish this year in the black, but only squeaked by, said Ed Desgrosseilliers, Pine Tree Council Abnaki District chairman.
The ongoing wood harvesting on 85 of the camp's 130 acres is expected to yield roughly $80,000. Some say the recent action shows it's being stripped of its natural resources before being marketed as land cleared for housing development, an assertion disputed by the council's executive director.
The $900,000 still owed on the Portland building, the Alton E. “Chuck” Cianchette Scout Service Center, was refinanced recently to make the monthly payments more affordable, Desgrosseilliers said. That has helped ease the strain on finances. But local Scout leaders say it's unclear where the proceeds from the harvesting might end up.
Anthony Rogers, the council's executive director, said Thursday that neither the timber cutting nor the possible sale of the camp is aimed at paying down the council's debt. Desgrosseilliers agrees.
He and others involved in the council's Abnaki District, which serves Androscoggin and Oxford counties, said what they believe is a push to sell is the result of bad management.
The latest spark in the debate over the camp's possible sale is the cutting. The denuded forest has changed the complexion of the property and it could take decades to restore the camp to the wilderness setting that has made it so valuable to the Scouts over the years, Desgrosseilliers said.
“They've destroyed a camp that is used by Scouts for scouting,” he said. “They've removed that wilderness atmosphere.”
More than 50 Scout packs, troops and crews use the camp. But an inventory undertaken of the council's four camps showed that Gustin was used least, Rogers has said.
The land was deeded to the Scouts by Charles W. Gustin in 1933 for camping. It has a dozen campsites that include open-air shelters and latrines, but few other amenities. “Countless boys have learned to swim, tie knots, pitch tents, build fires and save lives at Camp Gustin,” according to the council's website.
Local Scout leaders met earlier this week to discuss the cutting and upcoming council meeting. They wondered why the cutting was being done before the ground had a chance to freeze, making for tougher going on muddy logging roads. Softwood values are depressed, making sale of the harvest less marketable, they said.
“What appears devious to us is that what was presented as one thing is really another thing,” Desgrosseilliers said.
But Rogers and Walter Stinson, who heads up the council's committee that oversees council properties, said Thursday the cutting is strictly routine and shouldn't be construed as anything else.
“Timing in life is everything, and it may appear that there is some relationship there,” but there isn't, Stinson said. He confirmed that his committee would be making a recommendation to the full council at next month's meeting on whether to sell Camp Gustin. But the cutting has nothing to do with that recommendation, he said. “I can tell you that the two are unrelated. That's a fact.”
Rogers said the timing of the cutting was driven in part by the schedule of the loggers and the need to work around seasonal use of the camp.
Stinson said the cutting is part of a forest management program the council follows for all of its forested properties under the guidance and supervision of a registered forester. Asked whether the cutting is strictly maintenance or is being done to harvest trees for their timber value, Stinson said: “It's probably both.”
“It's not something that's being done because certain people think that that camp is going to be sold,” Rogers said. Even if Stinson's committee hadn't considered the possible sale of Camp Gustin, the same cutting would have happened at the same time, Rogers said. Stewardship of the camps is part of the council's mission, he said.
The decision whether to sell the camp property will be left to a simple majority of the 38-member council board, Rogers said.
“I don't think they'll support this sale,” Desgrosseilliers said. Some have said the Camp Gustin property could fetch as much as $375,000, but Desgrosseilliers is skeptical, putting the figure closer to $200,000, given the current real estate market.
The deed to the council for the camp property includes language that could bar its sale, Desgrosseilliers said. The council had drafted an affidavit for George Gustin's heirs to sign, saying it wasn't Gustin's intent to have use of the land restricted to camping activities.
The family hasn't signed that affidavit, Desgrosseilliers said. Two of Gustin's sons recently wrote a letter to the council to say: “We do not believe that the sale of the property is permissible. We believe that it was our father's full intention that when he gave this property to the Boy Scouts, that it be used as a campsite and for camping by the Boy Scouts in perpetuity.”
Desgrosseilliers said he planned to invite Gustin's grandson to attend next month's council meeting so that the board might hear opposition to the camp's sale from a direct descendant of the late benefactor.
“We've been in contact with the Gustin family numerous times and it's all been very positive," Rogers said. "There's nothing nefarious about our meetings with them. We respect the original gift that Charles Gustin provided this council and whether the council retains that property or reallocates the asset to another form to support the scouting program for kids, we'll work with the Gustin family to carry on the legacy of that gift in the Gustin name.”



Cony
The ruling that the old Cony high site could be sold to Hannaford even with the same wording seems to say otherwise. Also consider the portion of the Martel School property Lewiston sold to Shaws for a more local example. It seems like everyone is quick to break basic moral values for a quick buck and a promotion on to the next level. That's all Rodgers is looking for. He's got his flagship building, and now he wants a quick buck to balance the books and move on to "bigger and better" things. And we'll be left to deal with the consequences.
Perhaps an engaging mathematician could guess how much the Council will lose in cash long term if they sell the camp? Besides the immediate drop in donations, how much will be lost because local boys don't get the opportunity to use the camp and don't decide to join scouting?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The loss in money is tough to
The loss in money is tough to calculate...but start with Friends of Scouting not being as successful in the community - thats $20K per year, then add in popcorn if units refuse because council gets a hefty piece, thats $60K a year, then loss of rental property if they don't use other council camps, or worse the summer camp program...could be $40K there....then add in Abnali cub camp at Gustin, over $100 kids bring in $10K each year...they will not travel elsewhere, nor will the adult volunteers. I beleive the funds they get for logging and sale of land woudl total no more that $400K, which is 7 years on scouting related cash for the district...so what will they sell in 7 years? Nutter? Bomazeen?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This property will not be sold by the Pine Tree Council
The Pine Tree Council won't be able to sell this property. There is most likely language in the bequest stating that if the property is not used for scout camping that the property will revert to Mr. Gustin's heirs. Why else would the Pine Tree Council be trying to get Mr. Gustin's heirs to sign an affidavit saying that Mr. Gustin did not intend to have the property used solely for scout camping? OH HOW SLEAZY!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (14)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.who built
who built the building in portland [the headquarters] of ptc ? was it CIANBRO for publicity and stuck it to the scouts in the end.. that would be a Cianbro method , looking back at other projects in high profile markets.. sorry , just a thought.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I was born on Pleasant Ridge
I was born on Pleasant Ridge Road and spent many days and nights at Spear Pond. I hear that they changed both the name of the road and the pond to a different name. When a town does this it is much easier for them to to make or authorize changes to property. When people read the article they dont recognize the names so they dont realize what is being sold. The names will always remain the same in my memory. If the land is sold then there will be a number of houses in place of Scouting property. Once again Scout property will be sold and the town will enjoy the extra property tax's. Typical Portland money hungry people doing what they know best. It's a darn shame.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (10)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.clear the land
If they don't know what they are going to do with the property, keep it or sell it, why would they go ahead with this land clearing? Wouldn't you want to have a plan in place before you change the landscape? Also, why clear a good portion of this property for so-called "maintenance" when it had been untouched for all these years. Now all of a sudden it needs to be "maintained". This smells like yesterday's diapers.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (12)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The real problems started
when Tony Rogers' moved executies in January. Tony Bessey is the worst thing that ever happened to the district because he is nothing by a "yes" man for the Council. Tony Rogers' is afraid to have to explain his actions to Scott Verrill so moving him on is making the rest of the process much easier.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (17)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Way to Honor 100 Years of Scouting PTC
60 years ago a generous man felt so strongly about scouting that instead of selling his land for a profit, or passing it down to his children that he DONATED it to the Pine Tree Council with the understanding that he was leaving a legacy for generations to come of boys to camp in a real wilderness environment.
"A Scout is Trustworthy": How trustworthy is it to then go back on your word when it is convenient, to find loop holes in deeds to make up for fiscal irresponsibility? How trustworthy is it to put this story out there 1 year ago, make promises to leaders, boys, and the general public yet deny any request for more information, yet to refuse to speak of the matter so the 1000's of scouting members/supporters could lend a hand in finding alternatives?
"A Scout is Thrifty": You want to say that it is not about the building in Portland? Um....why on earth do you need a building that big and lavish when most of your employees should be on the road working with units? a 1 Million Dollar Mortgage ARE YOU KIDDING ME, and that is not a problem???? That doesnt sound "thrifty" to me.
You say it is the least used camp? What I find interesting is that as a volunteer I have visited all 4 of our scout camps this year, Bomazeen has had these grand plans of being a "cub world" for how long? yet only work I have seen done there is harvesting of trees? Nutter well that was torn up because of a tornado this summer and has extensive damage due to teenage vandalism in the area YET no one in council had seen it or been in to assess the damage, and still let units pay to camp there even though there were extensive safety concerns (like downed powerlines, huge uprooted trees? and then Hinds, yes Hinds is used frequently because that is where COUNCIL elects to hold their events.
Hopefully the board will make the right decision when they vote in November, stand up for the Values of Scouting! Stand up for what is right! Dont just put a band-aid on a festering infection! If they make the wrong decision and sell off the property I sure hope that the vote is conditional on the removal of Tony Rogers! You don't get to sell off a property that was donated due to financial irresponsibility and keep your job!
If you are a general member of society please dont think this issue doesnt effect you. It does! Scouting volunteers work very hard to instill positive character traits in todays youth, BOYS work very hard to "do their best" and to become positive citizens. These boys are this country's future. It will not stop at this one camp, next will be a girl scout camp, the YWCA, 4H, every childrens program is being affected and without these programs in place think of the disservice we are doing to our youth!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (42)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Tony "pinocchio" Rogers needs
Tony "pinocchio" Rogers needs to be removed as does Mr. Stinson, the Gosselins and Matt Randall.....that would give Scouting in Maine a fresh start.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (29)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Glad we didn't give
As a former Scout Leader in Pine Tree Council Abnaki District, I followed this story with increasing disgust form Florida. It was an annual and mandatory event that each troop hold a meeting with parents, grandparents and anyone else we could get to attend while Pine Tree Council Representatives came in and put on the hard sell for donations now and for bequests. It was especially disturbing since we were stuggling to run the troops while the council was building and outfitting a million dollar office palace that was never open for business. I am so grateful that my family did not make a donation of land and has not left anything to the council through bequest as clearly it would not be used for the boys as we would have intended but for plush digs and big pay checks for those in in Portland at Pine Tree Council headquarters. Our family gladly helped out the boys in local troops with the use of our camp and with financial donations.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (5)
Agree (48)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.nice
Excellent post Candice. Many scout parents feel the same way. If they sell this camp, they will have a very hard time with their 'friends of scouting' fundraising campaigns for quite a while. I donated every year their 'cost per scout per year' amount, which I think was $100 and then was raised to $144. I could easily see myself making this same donation for many years, even when my scout was no longer involved. I did not donate this year specifically because of the Gustin proposed sale, and I don't see myself donating to this organization anymore. Are you reading any of this PTC???
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (11)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.