WOODSTOCK — The Woodstock-based Friends of Spruce Mountain will appeal a land-use permit from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection allowing wind energy development.
Portland attorney Rufus Brown, who represents the nonprofit group, said he will file an appeal to the DEP on Wednesday, Nov. 3.
Brown said noise is his main concern. Opponents to wind projects point to Wind Turbine Syndrome, coined by a New York behavioral pediatrician to describe a series of symptoms found among people living near wind turbines.
The symptoms include trouble sleeping, headaches, dizziness, rapid heart rate and nausea.
Denise Hall of Woodstock, vice president of Friends of Spruce Mountain, lives about 2 miles from the proposed site but has friends who are much closer. She said residents are concerned about noise as well as property values falling.
“Common sense would tell you no one's going to want to buy a property next to an industrial wind park,” Hall said Friday.
She said clear-cutting for the turbine platforms as well as roads and power lines would hurt the mountain and the wildlife there.
In March, Woodstock voters rejected a moratorium on wind power development by a 100-41 vote. The development plans included a $20,000 yearly payment to the town of Woodstock for 20 years.
On Oct. 5, the DEP approved a permit for Patriot Renewables of Quincy, Mass., to build 10 wind turbines and the necessary power lines and access roads along the ridgeline of Spruce Mountain. Each turbine produces 2 megawatts.
In the permit, the DEP cited a 2009 review prepared for the American Wind Energy Association and the Canadian Wind Energy Association on health effects of wind turbines. After reviewing available literature on health effects blamed on wind turbines, the panel found no evidence that sounds from wind turbines caused health problems.
Because the project is in a rural area, the turbine noise audible by local residents must be 55 decibels or less in the daytime and 45 or less at night. A normal conservation level is 50-65 decibels.
At night, six of the towers would run in noise restricted mode to stay under the decibel limit.
This mode is part of Brown's appeal. “We don't think this (noise reduction technology) works as well in the real world as it's been modeled to work,” Brown said Friday. He said the fact that so many turbines must use noise reduction technology indicates that the project is too close to residents.
Brown is currently appealing two other Maine wind projects, including one on Record Hill in Roxbury.
Andy Novey of Patriot Renewables is project developer for the Spruce Mountain Wind Project. He said the company's noise models are conservative and the turbines will probably be quieter than projected.
“We did have a very conservative noise model,” Novey said. “There's really no basis for an appeal.”
Novey said the company hopes to begin construction on the wind farm next spring as soon as weather allows.
Hall said her group doesn't oppose wind power but believes it should be set up closer to highly populated areas. “We don't feel it's green energy to blast the mountains of Maine to ship the energy down to southern New England.”




Who
is this comment directed to? I didn't read any posts here from someone who is sitting home and collecting welfare.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.45decibal
World Health Organization rural areas = 40 decibels at night
DEP technical bulletins list rural areas = 40 decibels at night
SO ANDY NOVEY 45 decibels is not conservative.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Only $20,000 for the town?
Only $20,000 per year for the town, boy, are they getting screwed compared to what's been offered/paid for other projects around the state.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It is $20,000 more than they
It is $20,000 more than they would have without the wind development. Do you see any line to come in? I sure as hell don't; it is crap like this that is the reason why. Northwoods_maine, you going to bring something else in and offer more jobs and more in taxes? If you ain't going to put up, shut up.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.is it really any surprise maine was 50th for job growth?
citizens say no the any development. no plum creek, no casino's no wind farms. were the state of NO!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.wind
it is all for money. how can this happen to the earth?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (7)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.When was the last time you
When was the last time you held down a job and paid your own way? Of course some of us want to work and make an honest living whether as a mom and pop corner store or a wind developer it is about the money, making money to live on, pay your employees and hopefully build for the future, we aren't in it for charity though it feels like it with you sitting home cashing your welfare check on our tax dollars.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.When was the last time you
When was the last time you held down a job and paid your own way? Of course some of us want to work and make an honest living whether as a mom and pop corner store or a wind developer it is about the money, making money to live on, pay your employees and hopefully build for the future, we aren't in it for charity though it feels like it with you sitting home cashing your welfare check on our tax dollars.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.well Candice
Many of us are not convined that "wind developers" are honest job providers.
The wind developers are wanting to get government grants and monies to develop an energy source that will profit them for their construction, but will only cost us consumers more as it comes on to grid.
Mom and Pop stores will dissappear as the costs increase.
Candice? do you really know what you are talking about? Or are you just being politcally correct as a democrat?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Definitely not a Democrat!
Definitely not a Democrat! Do I know what I am talking about, YES! I have a BA in Economics and 15 years in securities and business consulting before going into international distribution for a total of 30 years. I am also a candidate for a Masters Degree in Public Policy and Management expecting to transfer to an MBA program in the fall due to the extreme liberalism in the PPM program. I don't see it as the developers getting a lot of money from the govenment to build; I see it as them getting money to R&D the technology which is huge in physical size so we all see it. As I pointed out in previous posts, oil companies, auto makers, coal companies, pharmaceuticals to name just a few get billions of dollars annually from the government for R&D, not to mention the tax perks. A few of the tax perks include Debt-finace corporation when they borrow rather than use equity to purchase they get to deduct on their taxes of 6% where a non-corporate buisness will pay 21%. Mining structures are taxed only 10% and Petroleum and natural gas structures only 9% while manufacturing buildings get hit with a whopping 32% tax and computers and perip equipment 37%. So while some think wind development is getting special treatment, they are not, it is just more out in the open which is being exploited by the gas, oil and coal people who see alternative energy and fuel efficiency as a threat to their bottomlines, their subsidies, perks and government R&D funds.
On the production side, you all need to get up to speed on cap and trade. While most of you think cap and trade is about carbon emissions, it was written by big oil, gas and coal and a select additional others the boost their bottom lines. I strongly recommend Timothy P. Carney's book Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses which is available through inter library loan. While you are worried about wind development making rates go up or complaining they that they wont make them go down, the existing oil, gas, and coal fired plants are drooling knowing they are about to suck you dry and see their profits go through the roof as the result of cap and trade.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.These are going to be just
These are going to be just like Plum Creek. The developer is going to jump through all the regulatory hoops, then end up in civil litigation. Just watch if either or both casino's pass it will be the same way. We ended up with nothing with Plum Creek, we will end up with nothing from wind, we will end up with nothing with the casinos but the reputation that even if you obey the laws you aren't welcome in Maine so don't take your business there. This state is nuts. It has earned 50th for business and careers. It has earned oldest population. It has earned its welfare state status. And it has earn bottom wages.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (10)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.