AUBURN — There could be neatly choreographed lights on Vista Drive again this Christmas season, but they're not there yet.
Jamie Loggins, the designer of the controversial light show, said they might not be back at all. He won't know for several days whether he'll have time to create the display.
"It's just like everything, it takes time to do and I haven't had much time," he said. "We've been working on them when we can. I hope to get to a point when I can tell people that the show is just a week away. But I'm not even at that point yet."
Loggins has presented the show on his front lawn for the past few Decembers, and he has been joined by neighbor Stephen Bang. The displays feature thousands of lights choreographed to holiday music broadcast on a low-power FM signal. People are invited to pull up to the curb, tune their car radios to the signal and enjoy the show.
Many have, prompting neighbors to complain to Loggins and to the city about traffic on their cul-de-sac.
The city considered last month charging Loggins a fee to pay for traffic control on Vista Drive and Park Avenue. That plan was voted down, clearing the way for Loggins to do the show.
"We couldn't afford to do it otherwise," he said.
But that means there will be no Auburn Police on hand to help direct traffic, unless it becomes a matter of public safety. Loggins, Bang and their families will be responsible for directing traffic if there is a show.
Loggins said he had 160,000 lights on his house for last year's show, and his neighbor had almost as many.
"It's a matter of testing the lights and then figuring out where you're going to put them," he said. "Then, you have to figure out when you want them to flash and set that all up. As long as it takes to just set up the lights, it takes even longer to create the magic."
As of Tuesday, Bang had put some decorations in his front yard, but Loggins had not. Loggins has set up a Web site, www.auburnlights.com. He'll update it as soon as he decides whether he'll host a show.
"We've had some people drive by, just kind of checking to see what we're doing," he said. "But the website is the best way to check."


Perhaps he is having second
Perhaps he is having second thoughts about being a nuisance and a bad neighbor because he is losing his 'patients'. Pun intended.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (14)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If i had a dime for every time this Dr. said he's broke.........
There are homeless KIDS in this community that still attend school. Hungry, with donated clothes on their backs; so the Dr. too poor to buy more Christmas lights won't be getting any donation from me. I would think the good Dr. would understand more than the average person how critical it could be for a neighboring heart attack victim impeded by the traffic that the good Dr. is KNOWINGLY creating with his light show that he can't afford. Maybe the Dr. should ask his lawyer if his malpractice insurance covers him at home ?????
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (24)
Agree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.must be lonely
way out on that limb like that.
i never knew that putting up too many christmas lights made you liable for every ridiculas thing people could think of.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (17)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I think he was referring to
I think he was referring to the fact that the traffic caused by the light impeded emergency services from arriving in time to help a heart attack victim, you can bet your big mouth that the grieving widow would sue the doctor, and there would be a cadre of lawyers chomping at the bit to take the case. Even if he wasn't found responsible, the attorney fees would hit him in his Christmas spirit.
What I do not understand is why the police cannot spare ONE cop for a few hours a night to direct traffic. Can't the Chief spare ONE officer? There are over 70 cops in Auburn, and the Chief can't spare ONE? I know they're not around in my neighborhood, so where are they, protecting Dunkin Donuts?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Tron is still an idiot
According to the report on the Auburn Police's website, they have 50 officers with 34 officers on patrol with 7 on a night shift. With just 7 cops on, I'm sure they have more serious crime to fight than direct traffic for someone's hobby. Next time get your facts straight before you start your anti-cop tirade.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.this time i agree with tron
with 7 officers on duty one could be placed on vista drive. auburn isint so crime infested that anyone would notice. what more serious crime do you think is going on?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.fun but a nuisance
I know of at least 2 prospective house sales in that neighborhood that have failed due the buyer backing out doe to the traffic from the lights. We all love the lights but who wants to live through that traffic for a month!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (7)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.spelling error!
due to... not doe!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.typo
i bet it was more a typo then a spelling error.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Hopefully these fine folks
Hopefully these fine folks wont let the Scrooges ruin it for them and everyone else.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (17)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.