AUGUSTA (AP) —With 20,000 ballots from Scarborough and South Portland counted, neither side gained votes Thursday in the first day of a rare statewide recount on the outcome of the Oxford casino referendum.
The well-orchestrated process got under way in the building that houses state police headquarters after Deputy Secretary of State Julie Flynn outlined the technicalities of state law regulating ballots and recounts.
What could become an arduous effort was being carried out at a U-shaped arrangement of tables, broken into 10 ballot-reviewing teams of "yes" and "no" representatives, and a state election official.
The recount was requested by casino foes after voters on Nov. 2 approved the statewide ballot question by 4,601 votes. Unofficial tallies put the margin at less than 1 percent of more than 564,000 votes cast statewide.
State officials decided not to bring in all of the ballots at once. Instead, they will work in phases, with South Portland and Scarborough ballots checked first. Flynn said those communities were chosen because the state already had their ballots from an earlier recount in a state Senate race.
Statewide recounts are "fairly rare" in Maine, said Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, adding that the last one was held in the 1990s. The cost of the recount that began Thursday will depend on how long it takes, which could be weeks.
"In a recount, what you really seem to find are less sweeping changes ... typically small, clerical errors," said Dunlap.
State law is specific about what causes a vote to be counted in or out, said Flynn.
In 1995, Maine voters approved a law requiring all motorists to use seat belts or face fines. The United Bikers of Maine requested a recount. But the motorcyclists' group threw in the towel after nearly 12 percent of the ballots were counted again.
Prior to that, a recount was conducted in 1970 that upheld the election of Gov. Kenneth Curtis and a recount in 1966 confirmed the voters' decision to retain restrictions on Sunday sales.
Officials with Black Bear Entertainment, which wants to build a $165 million complex with slot machines and table games, are hoping the outcome of the recount will be obvious in the early stages.
"We think after the first five towns are done, which will be the first five days, that we'll have a very good indication of where this is going. And we hope that if nothing is changed, that the 'no' side will understand the trend here," said Daniel Walker, attorney for the pro-casino side.
"If they decide to go another five days with the next five towns, it will bring us up to one-fifth of the state within 10 days. At that point, if there hasn't been any significant shifts, we'd expect that that would be sufficient for this process," Walker said.
Dennis Bailey, a leader of casino opponents, acknowledged the difficulty of getting volunteers for his side to recount ballots given the unpredictable length of the process.
One of his side's volunteers was out sick, slowing down the count so that each side had nine counters. He said he expected a full 10 counters to show up on Friday.
"It's real tough to get people to commit to something we don't know how long will last," Bailey said. He also stopped short of predicting how the recount would turn out.
"I would say the odds of reversing are better than the odds at their casino," he said.




What a total waste of
What a total waste of taxpayer money. Bailey must be getting delusional from all those late night gigs when he was a "rocker". Does he REALLY think they're going to overturn a victory margin of 4601 votes with recounts? Typical liberal democRAT. If you can't steal an election, overturn the result at all cost, regardless of what it takes. Absolutely sickening.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Dennis Baily needs to find
Dennis Baily needs to find another 'hobby'. All he is doing is costing we taxpayers money. ( it said on last nights news that WE are paying for this) I also saw dennis counting the votes on the news last night. HE of all people , should NOT be one of the counters! Talk about a conflict of interest!
Apparently he is not a 'gambling man', as his quote, ""I would say the odds of reversing are better than the odds at their casino," he said' is so wrong..It will be passed, and the casino WILL be built. Wonder what 'cause' he will flock to next??
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (10)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Casino referendum recount
Dennis Bailey's quote proves he's a real comedien maybe when they are builtm, he can be hired to work in on of thier night clubs!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.agenda
the anti crew will not quit until the last wrench is is thrown in the gears, (and at the will of the people) next a legal challenge to see if the judicial branch will influence law . people that voted for this casino, long for change, decent work & wages is what this opportunity brings
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (13)
Disagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Oh you mean like how the
Oh you mean like how the Pro-Casino folks wouldn’t quit after the last 2 referendums were voted down? They continued to press the issue and fight for what they believe, but I guess as soon as it passes the opposition should just sit back and let it happen…
If you "long for change, decent work& wages", you didn't help your cause in the least. What you got is a huge influx of out-of-state, low-wage earners, thousands more recipients of welfare and subsidized housing, and a double-digit increase in crimes. That has been the result in EVERY instance where gambling has been legalized in the COUNTRY. What makes you think Maine will be any different?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (5)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'm not exactly in favor of
I'm not exactly in favor of the casino either, but one has to admit that spending taxpayer money for a recount in this instance during this lousy economy is frivolous, at best.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The Maine constitution allows for the recount process......
and with a 4600 vote difference i dont blame them for asking for it, HOWEVER, if after the 5 largest communites in Maine are counted and do not show any real changes, then the opposistion should back out, if they do not then it goes beyond what would be reasonably expected into something more onerous, and would be a complete squandering of our taxpayers dollars.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Rolling Large Boulders
The rolling of large boulders uphill has commenced.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (20)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The casino will be half built
The casino will be half built before they finish screwing around with recounts trying to overturn the vote.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (23)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.