WASHINGTON (AP) — In a historic vote for gay rights, the Senate agreed on Saturday to do away with the military's 17-year ban on openly gay troops and sent President Barack Obama legislation to overturn the Clinton-era policy known as "don't ask, don't tell."
Obama was expected to sign the bill into law next week, although changes to military policy probably wouldn't take effect for at least several months. Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers must first certify that lifting the ban won't hurt troops' ability to fight. After that, the military would undergo a 60-day wait period.
Repeal would mean that, for the first time in American history, gays would be openly accepted by the armed forces and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.
More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.
"It is time to close this chapter in our history," Obama said in a statement. "It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed."
The Senate voted 65-31 to pass the bill, with eight Republicans siding with 55 Democrats and two independents in favor of repeal. The House had passed an identical version of the bill, 250-175, earlier this week.
Supporters hailed the Senate vote as a major step forward for gay rights. Many activists hope that integrating openly gay troops within the military will lead to greater acceptance in the civilian world, as it did for blacks after President Harry Truman's 1948 executive order on equal treatment regardless of race in the military.
"The military remains the great equalizer," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. "Just like we did after President Truman desegregated the military, we'll someday look back and wonder what took Washington so long to fix it."
Sen. John McCain, Obama's GOP rival in 2008, led the opposition. Speaking on the Senate floor minutes before a crucial test vote, the Arizona Republican acknowledged he couldn't stop the bill. He blamed elite liberals with no military experience for pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.
"They will do what is asked of them," McCain said of service members. "But don't think there won't be a great cost."
How the military will implement a change in policy, and how long that will take remains unclear. Senior Pentagon officials have said the new policy could be rolled out incrementally, service by service or unit by unit.
In a statement issued immediately after the vote, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he will begin the certification process immediately. But any change in policy won't come until after careful consultation with military service chiefs and combatant commanders, he said.
"Successful implementation will depend upon strong leadership, a clear message and proactive education throughout the force," he said.
Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he welcomes the change.
"No longer will able men and women who want to serve and sacrifice for their country have to sacrifice their integrity to do so," he said. "We will be a better military as a result."
Sen. Carl Levin, a chief proponent of repeal, said he has received a commitment from the administration that it won't drag its heels.
"We hope it will be sooner, rather than later," he said.
The fate of "don't ask, don't tell" had been far from certain earlier this year when Obama called for its repeal in his State of the Union address. Despite strong backing from liberals in Congress, Republicans and conservative Democrats remained skeptical that lifting the ban could be done quickly without hurting combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In February, Mullen provided the momentum Obama needed by telling a packed Senate hearing room that he felt the law was unjust. As chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mullen became the first senior active-duty officer in the military to suggest that gays could serve openly without affecting military effectiveness.
"No matter how I look at the issue," Mullen said, "I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens."
With Mullen's backing, Gates ordered a yearlong study on the impact, including a survey of troops and their families.
The study, released Nov. 30, found that two-thirds of service members didn't think changing the law would have much of an effect. But of those who did predict negative consequences, most were assigned to combat arms units. The statistic became ammunition for opponents of repeal, including the service chiefs of the Army and Marine Corps.
"I don't want to lose any Marines to the distraction," Gen. James Amos, head of the Marine Corps, told reporters. "I don't want to have any Marines that I'm visiting at Bethesda (Naval Medical Center) with no legs be the result of any type of distraction."
Mullen and Gates counter that the fear of disruption is overblown and could be addressed through training. They note the Pentagon's finding that 92 percent of troops who believe they have served with a gay person saw no effect on their units' morale or effectiveness.
But even with backing from Gates and Mullen, the bill appeared all but dead this month when Senate Republicans united against it on procedural grounds. In last-minute wrangling, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was able to revive the bill during the rare Saturday session with just days to go before the lame-duck session was to end.
The Republicans who voted for repeal said the Pentagon study on gays and assurances from senior military leaders played a crucial role.
"The repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell' will be implemented in a common sense way," said Ohio Republican Sen. George Voinovich. "Our military leaders have assured Congress that our troops will engage in training and address relevant issues before instituting this policy change."
Advocacy groups were jubilant following the Senate's initial test vote that passed 63-33 and set up final passage. The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network called the issue the "defining civil rights initiative of this decade." Supporters of repeal filled the visitor seats overlooking the Senate floor, ready to protest had the bill failed.
"This has been a long-fought battle, but this failed and discriminatory law will now be history," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign.
At least 25 countries allow gays to serve openly in the armed forces, among them Britain, Canada and Israel, according to the Palm Center, a research institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara.



Why is it too much to ask
Why is it too much to ask that the homosexuals don’t flaunt their perversions? I mean it is one thing to ask a “black man” to be less black, that’s discrimination. But you are simply asking someone who makes a CHOICE to be gay not to throw it in your face and make people uncomfortable...
The only difference between the Gay agenda and the NAMBLA is Hollywood’s almighty dollar...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.That's Your Affliction "FatandHappy"
Fatandhappy,
If I were mean I'd call YOU retarded, but that would be such an insult to retarded individuals. You're something else, a combination of ignorant and hateful. The good thing is that no matter what you say it is you who will have to get up every morning and know, deep down, what kind of person you're looking at in the mirror. That's your affliction.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The Ignorant "Mindset" That Plagues America
Fatandhappy,
I'm embarrassed that I live in a country that is home to ignorant people like you. By the way, why do you have a Confederate flag as your "symbol"? Are you in favor of slavery, or just in denial about what monsters the south was home to that they would enslave their fellow human beings. Your "mind" (such as it is) is merely an example of the type of ignorance that has always plagued America, making it so much less than it could be. A hundred and fifty years ago, you would have been arguing that slavery was "traditional." If I were cheritable I'd pity you, but I'm not, so I just revile you. Someone like you is what's wrong with America and there's a "party" that's all your own called Republican.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Apparently fat, you have no
Apparently fat, you have no problem with Airborne allowing the retarded in their ranks, so what's your problem with the gays?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.A person has to be a little
A person has to be a little bit retarded to jump out of a perfectly good airplane.
When I was in homosexuals were forbidden to be in the military at all, DADT made it possible for them to serve as long as they kept their sexual abberations to themselves. But that wasn't good enough, now they want to serve openly. What will they demand next?
If I was facing a highly trained vicious commandos from an enemy force, I would want more than just a sissy to cover my back. I watched two homosexuals fight once down in New Orleans, it was hysterical. They were slapping each other with overhand, open fists and squealing in girlie voices, saying "Stop, stop, quit it, stop!", and then scratching with their fingernails, and finally kicking like girls. I expect they were using one of the usual gay drugs like meth or poppers. I laughed my butt off, it was like watching two Jr High school girls fight over a boy.
I couldn't imagine those two homosexuals making it through Airborne School, much less withstand the grueling training we constantly went through, they would be a laughing stock at the best, and kicked out for "failure to adapt to military training" at the worst.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.fatandhappy.. if you want to
fatandhappy.. if you want to have a reasonable discussion about whether it is a good idea to let homosexuals serve openly in the military. But just know you aren't going to be taken very seriously if all you do is throw attacks out there. Part of me thinks this is all just for shock factor anyway.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Not quite
hurunble, you are wrong. My stance on homosexuals is not for "shock factor"
I truly, honestly despise homosexuals and I loathe what they are doing to this country.
I try to help my fellow man and neighbors in any way I can, but I would not assist a homosexual no matter how dire his situation.
I am sorry if my attitude seems like "attacks", but our country and our culture is being attacked by the liberal gay agenda, and an aggressive response is only natural. It's funny to me how you homosexuals can dish out attacks to those that oppose you, but go crying "bigot" and "homophobe" when the table is turned.
And as far as a "reasonable discussion about gays in the military"? There is nothing reasonable about it. It is ridiculous and a disgrace. In my opinion it is not open to discussion, it is just wrong. Period.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Listen pork chop . . .
The expression of your disgust of homosexuality is clear and frankly, I find if offensive. Clearly this pleases you, otherwise you'd be spending a little more brain power (something you seriously lack) on finding more elegant and elloquent ways of expressing your sentiments. So you understand my point of view . . . as a homosexual, I find you equally disgraceful. And for obvious reasons. A good Samaratin you're not. Untrustworthy you most certainly seem. Cruelty and obnoxiousness go without question. For you alone, I would expect, inspire many to support the reapeal of D.A.D.T. I challenge you to keep your hard-heartedness when you realize that a gay servicemember died in order to keep secure the values you hold so strongly. Understand that gays and lesbians are already serving in the military. Realize they did so for many reasons - one of them being they want to serve. Relent your useless and hateful rhetoric that displays you as nothing more than an interminable bore. Recognize that anyone willing to stand in the way of a bullet or a bomb does so for the benefit of people like you. Gay or straight why would you even dare to complain? That you do - and so disgracefully I would add - makes you nothing more than a jerk. Merry Christmas fat boy.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The real men in this country
The real men in this country can defend it just fine without any help from homosexuals.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Listen pork chop . . .
The expression of your disgust of homosexuality is clear and frankly, I find if offensive. Clearly this pleases you, otherwise you'd be spending a little more brain power (something you seriously lack) on finding more elegant and elloquent ways of expressing your sentiments. So you understand my point of view . . . as a homosexual, I find you equally disgraceful. And for obvious reasons. A good Samaratin you're not. Untrustworthy you most certainly seem. Cruelty and obnoxiousness go without question. For you alone, I would expect, inspire many to support the reapeal of D.A.D.T. I challenge you to keep your hard-heartedness when you realize that a gay servicemember died in order to keep secure the values you hold so strongly. Understand that gays and lesbians are already serving in the military. Realize they did so for many reasons - one of them being they want to serve. Relent your useless and hateful rhetoric that displays you as nothing more than an interminable bore. Recognize that anyone willing to stand in the way of a bullet or a bomb does so for the benefit of people like you. Gay or straight why would you even dare to complain? That you do - and so disgracefully I would add - makes you nothing more than a jerk. Merry Christmas fat boy.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.You called it a "liberal gay
You called it a "liberal gay agenda". There were plenty of Republicans too who feel it's ridiculous or it would not have passed. Why are you calling it a liberal gay agenda?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Oops
My first sentence was not a complete one. But you can figure out how I may have finished it. Sorry.
Also, tron... you aren't helping. But when do you ever?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Please ignore the guy in the
Please ignore the guy in the white sheet, or stars and bars, same difference. He is probably against blacks, women, foreigners and any other person is isn't a WASP bigot serving. Thankfully, common sense is prevailing. I know homosexuals who would kick his ass, but unlike the coward, he would do it on his own, not with a bunch of his friends wearing sheets.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This is widely supported by
This is widely supported by the American people and members of our military. There is no reason someone should have to conceal their sexuality to fight for their country. There have been worthy and capable people discharged from the armed forces because their homosexuality was exposed, and who knows how many honorable people have neglected to go into the military because they knew they'd be unable to be themselves.
Any issues that may arise from this won't take long to go away. People will get used to it and that will be that. This is good to see happen.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Fighting gays?
"There is no reason someone should have to conceal their sexuality to fight for their country".
I agree with half of your statement. DADT should be repealed because homosexuals have no business in our military whether they conceal it or not.
As far as "fighting for our country"? We are going to be laughed at by the Iranians, Koreans, Taliban and Al Queida. What are gays going to do if they are faced with hand to hand combat? "Scratch their eyes out"?, hit em between the eyes with the heels of their pumps? or just slap them?
This is a joke, and a disgrace, and I don't think it will last beyond Obama's reign of terror.
An Army of Sissies
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Seriously?
Your comments on balance are crass, rude, disrespectful and ignorant. Think of the men and women fighting for our country before you say such blatantly homophobic comments again. You should be embarrassed.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.You are missing the point here
Joseph said "Think of the men and women fighting for our country"
That is my whole point. I don't want homosexuals fighting for me or my country. I don't want homosexuals to represent our country in any way, especially by wearing a military uniform.
I DO NOT respect the homosexuals in our military because they shouldnt be there in the first place. They disgrace the uniform and the honor of those that fought and died to give them the right to live in a perverted fashion.
They need to stay home with the rest of the women and let the real men do the fighting.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (7)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.So on the whole . . .
So on the whole you find nothing valid about homosexuals. OK, I get the point. Happily not as many people agree with your opinion as they once had. So unless you plan on spending the rest of your afternoon complaining, I can only assume that your disgust of other peoples behavior is what drive your opinions. I don't find that rational. I don't find that even vaguely intelligent. So go ahead believe whatever you wish - you have the right - even if you lead with your knee all the time. Just remember, fat stuff, there are thousands of gay men and women willing to stand in the way of a bullet or bomb for your sake. Just remember what it takes to become a U.S. servicemember and realize that even homosexuals want to serve. That commands a great deal of respect - which clearly you cannot give. Such a shame. My grateful thanks to those who supported the real of DADT.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Don't waste your time on him,
Don't waste your time on him, Joseph. This veteran worked with homosexuals and heterosexuals alike and could not have wished for a better team.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Embarrassed?
I served 4 years in a combat arms unit (Airborne), and have earned the right to my opinion, unlike those of you that have never served.
And what I am embarrassed about is that now girly, Nancy-boys can enlist into the same unit. It is a disgrace and a joke.
Did you say "homophobic"? as in being afraid of homosexuals? Don't be ridiculous.
Homosexuals are like dog turds.....I am not afraid of them, but I think they are disgusting.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (8)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yes, embarassing
So clearly you're advocating discrimination. But calling people names such like "nancy-boy" is pretty neurotic, childish and just plain stupid. Grow up fat stuff.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I am embarrassed that I live
I am embarrassed that I live in a country that supports sexually perverted deviants.
The whole gay agenda and the acceptance of it is the silliest, most ridiculous notion that the world has ever known.
It ain't natural.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.silly
"We are going to be laughed at by the Iranians, Koreans, Taliban and Al Queida." Aw, does that hurt your widdle fee-fees?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.