A matter of convenience

Today is the first of Maine's 20 mandatory shutdown days to be scheduled over the next two years, days when nonessential government workers are off, government offices are shuttered and the public's business is neutralized.

The savings is expected to reach $14 million, at least that's the current thinking. It's tough to say two years out exactly what the savings might be, or if the furlough actually matures to the full 10 day schedule each year.

The shutdown days make sense from a budget perspective. If employees aren't working, they're not getting paid and taxpayers save the cost of those salaries. The plan — which is not a new idea in Maine — was adopted after great resistance to a proposal to impose a 5 percent pay cut on state workers. The furlough days will impose something closer to a 3 percent cut in pay, plus merit pay and automated longevity pay hikes are frozen, with no discussion on a thaw.

It's a step back, to be sure, but compared to other states, Maine's public sector employees are paid disproportionately well compared to their peers in the private sector, so pinching these salaries is good for the public wallet.

What isn't so good is the inability of that public to access government services during these furlough days, most of which are conveniently scheduled to extend already long weekends for government workers. For instance, Labor Day Weekend for state employees will now include Friday, Sept. 5, in addition to the Sept. 7 Monday holiday. Columbus Day Weekend will include Friday, Oct. 9, in addition to the Oct. 11 Monday holiday. And, of course, there's today, which has extended the Fourth of July holiday an extra day beyond last Friday's day off.

There is a solitary furlough day scheduled Aug. 7, a Friday, that is not tied to a holiday weekend, but the remaining schedule on 2009 expands holiday weekends. For citizens who have pressing business to conduct with government, it's a major inconvenience to wait another day on top of an already long weekend.

The shutdown days were scheduled to save salaries, not the costs of heating, cooling, insuring or otherwise of operating offices, so there was no real need to tie these days to existing holidays. It is, undoubtedly, a perk for state workers to get that extra day, which doesn't exactly balance the fact that the day isn't paid, but it does make the cut less sharp.

Not all of the furlough days have been scheduled out over the next two years, but those scheduled for the remainder of 2009 lean toward the convenience of state workers instead of the need for citizens to access government. We suggest that as the schedule is set for the remaining shutdown days, it lean equally favorably toward the public.

Here's an idea: Let workers pick which days they want to take unpaid, coordinating no more than one day off per month with their co-workers so that most offices can remain staffed but taxpayers still realize the benefit of the salary savings, which is the singular goal of the shutdown days. Workers benefit by taking off time that's convenient for them, and the public benefits by being able to fully access government at their convenience.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Jabba's picture
verified

I am simply curious if all

I am simply curious if all the state senators and represenatives are also taking a furlough day. Are they suffering the same effective pay cut as other state workers? Talk about a drag on our economy....Maine has senators and represenatives at over a thousand times the rate of the federal government. Let's rewrite the state constitution and have say one senator per county and one represenative per 50 thousand citizens. How much tax money would that save?

skippy's picture
verified

I enjoy people likie cranky

I enjoy people likie cranky Yankee; why would anyone take a 40% pay cut to move any where unless they finally realized this is what they are realy worth. To say simply raise the sales tax is not too intelligent. The State and all governments must be encouraged to live within its means. The public wallet is not an unending feed trough that can be raided at will. This mentality is what is killing this State and Nation. Cut programs and benefits.

jotter's picture

Your suggestion assumes that

Your suggestion assumes that government workers do no actual work. In reality, if one staff member takes a day off, that person's workload, often more than one person can reasonably do in a day, will be shifted to another staffer in that office/department. This creates overwhelming workloads, extra hours, and complaints from an already impatient public when a less than fully staffed office tries to do the work of a missing team member. We're already withholding pay; letting these people have their extended weekends is small compensation to them and very little burden to the public.

Old Bill's picture

Yankee, the real answer lies

Yankee, the real answer lies in the State Government itself. It's far too big, and seems to be unanswerable to We, The People. The size of the state government needs to be decreased. Some positions must be cut now, others can be cut through attrition. Programs need to be cut, as well, and perhaps some Departments need to be culled. I don't pretent to have the answers, but I submit the above as food for thought and debate. Off subject, this site still stinks. It's hard to use and doesn't have all the features the old site had. When the Powers That Be rectify this major abomination?
"democracy will cease to exist when the government takes from those who would work and gives to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson.

Hulk's picture

"And this is based on what

"And this is based on what research or information?"

"Publisher: The Heartland Institute, using data published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce. In 2005 in Maine, the report notes, public-sector wages and salaries were 1.2 percent lower than the private sector, or $31,428 versus $31,812. But the average benefits package in Maine for the public sector was 77.2 percent higher than in the private sector--$12,059 versus $6,805. The analysis revealed that in 2005, public-sector employees on average received 12.6 percent higher overall compensation than private-sector employees--$43,487 versus $38,617."

The furloughs were definitely a lazy way out, they should fire a good 50% of the state workers (excluding law enforcement).

Sure just raise taxes and destroy productive private sector jobs so we can have more non productive public sector jobs!

"With the furlough days, the state loses 20 days of productivity, as well as the tax income on that part of the lost wages"

You can't be serious! State workers produce nothing, they are a parasitic drag on the economy. Every dollar that we don't pay out to state workers means we recover 100% of their salary not just the 6.5% income tax that the state gets from them!

Brilliant move, pay out $200 million to recover $13 million in taxes. Great math!

Boondock Saint's picture

200 Mil is much more than 14

200 Mil is much more than 14 mil, agreed. But I'm never really a fan of raising taxes. To me this is all stupid anyway. A big part of Obama's stimulus plan is creating new jobs. But how much of that is creating new government jobs that have to be paid by tax payers? So people embrace this stimulus plans, and government officials praise the jobs they create and money that comes in, and then they turn around and say 'we have too many government jobs already so we have to create mandatory unpaid days off to save money.' This is government officials indirectly admitting that government is to big and needs to be cut, without actually cutting anything. Just easing the pain. For now.

MomOfTwo's picture

I can't believe I'm going to

I can't believe I'm going to say this, but I agree with CY...in part. Furlough days are dumb. The size of the state government is too big to support itself. Furlough days are a band-aid on an open, seeping, infected wound. It covers it up but does nothing to address the real problem. CUT POSITIONS PERMANENTLY! Curious how many of those state employees voted for good ole Baldi.

cranky yankee's picture

"Maine's public sector

"Maine's public sector employees are paid disproportionately well compared to their peers in the private sector." And this is based on what research or information? I would argue that Maine's public sector employees are paid nowhere near as well as private sector employees, in Maine or in other states. Further, Maine's public sector employees are paid about 20% less that in many neighboring states. Coming to Maine, highly recruited and from "away," I took a 40% pay cut for the "privilege" of living in Maine and paying Maine taxes.

Frankly, the furlough days, while certainly providing a savings, were a lazy way out. Sure, we all hate to pay taxes, but a simple 1% increase in the sales tax (from 5 to 6%) would have resulted in $200 million dollars in additional state revenue. With the furlough days, the state loses 20 days of productivity, as well as the tax income on that part of the lost wages. Further, the state loses the income tax revenue on anything the workers may have purchased with those lost wages. Brilliant move, turn down $200 million to save $14. Great math!

Advertisement