Auburn's dangerous deal

Auburn’s City Council is close to approving a proposal allowing stand-alone slaughterhouses in agricultural/resource protection zones. That would impact 50 percent of Auburn.

Auburn zoning laws prohibit spot zoning. It is detrimental to the city. Allowing one exception opens doors to other spot zone requests. Changing the entire AG/RP district will circuitously accomplish spot zoning for Craig Linke and his slaughterhouse proposal for Trapp Road. Auburn would have little basis for refusal when approached by others with similar zoning requests.

City Manager Glenn Aho states Linke shouldn’t have to wait for an answer. Auburn taxpayers have asked numerous questions about how city officials will address property devaluations, odors, public nuisance, road maintenance, water, sewer and biohazard concerns (related also to Linke’s previous chicken slaughterhouse on Trapp Road).

Auburn residents wait. Why isn't Aho concerned with providing timely answers to their questions?

Auburn’s voters elected the councilors to represent them; to protect the best interests of the city and its residents. They are representing a non-resident to the neglect of their constituents.  Auburn is being poorly protected.

New England slaughterhouses operate at 37 percent capacity.  An online source shows 10 slaughterhouses located within one hour of Auburn; another 10 within two hours. No additional slaughterhouses are needed here.

Auburn’s industrial zone permits slaughterhouses if true economic need is determined. Don’t change AG/RP zones to allow them in an additional 50 percent of the city.

An independent needs assessment should be conducted before putting Auburn and its citizens at such considerable risk.

Michelle Melaragno, Auburn

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

DR's picture

Realistically, Auburn is no

Realistically, Auburn is no longer a farming community. The ludicrously high taxes in Auburn have made it impossible for anyone except long-time landowners to farm, and even they may expect to be re-evaluated out of business in the not too distant future. No one who doesn't already own farmland in Auburn can afford to buy it, pay taxes on it, and begin farming. Just look at sales listings on newenglandmoves.com (which also gives tax info) if you don't think so.
To me there is little point to allowing a slaughterhouse to come into what is essentially a residential city rather than agricultural town.

joe gray's picture
verified

What risk?

I still don't understand why all the sensationalism regarding this proposal.

As I stated before, the Ag/Rp zone is pegged at 40% according to city staff. If you eliminate the Lake Auburn watershed, the Taylor Pond watershed, the Shoreland Water Protection area, golf courses, and parks, where the planning board is recommending slaugher facilities not be allowed, then we are down to about 20 - 25% of Auburn's land mass.

Slaughterhouses are a natural fit in an agricultural zone. As Mr Miller pointed out at the Oct 4, 2010 city council meeting, the Ag zone is really an industrial zone and is not intended to be a residential zone. The planning board has allowed strip zoning along many roads in the ag zone to become rural residential, putting the viability of the ag land further off the road in question. These strip zones should be dismantled and put back into ag zone for use in ag operations. Auburn has a history of strong farms and that is now sorely lacking due to the encroachment of rural residential and Low Density Country Residential zoning decisions. The Ag zone is not there for you to buy land, get the zoning changed, and then sell at a huge mark up. The zone is for raising animals and crops. The planning board is even proposing to ban drive through restaurant on Minot Ave, though drive through banks would be okay. The zoning laws in Auburn are in need of serious review and overhaul.

A call to our own city staff shows that property did not devalue when the chicken processing plant was opened on Trapp Rd a decade or so ago. Further research indicates that property has not devalued near other slaughterhouses in Maine.

The odors/nuisance issues are largely fictitious. Odors are common in the Ag zone as many of us have livestock. The letter write has animals are her address. Being animal owners, we have manure onsite. The slaughterhouse is not allowed by state and federal laws to stockpile manure or offal (the waste from slaughter activities). Offal must be sealed in containers and trucked offsite every day.

Road maintenance is an ongoing problem in Auburn. It is not slaughterhouses that made the roads in this city deteriorate. It is simply lack of attention and lack of money. We need to focus the money in city hall to areas that would benefit the public the most, including fixing our roads.

Research of other slaughter facilities in Maine shows that most use well water and private sewer. This is also regulated by state and federal laws and requires regular monitering and testing.

I called the author of the study that Ms Melaragno cites regarding the 37% of capacity figure. I forwarded a letter from the author stating the study was not to be used for local decision making and it pointed to the need for further study. Online sources will also indicate that there are hundreds of grocery stores within a couple hours of Auburn, but I bet Ms Melaragno would have no objection to another one coming to Auburn.

The point being that an individual might not want to use the facility, so don't. But some of us need these facilities. Everyone who eats meat needs slaughter faciities. Here in Maine we have only small facilities that process small numbers of animals and do it humanely, cleanly, and professionally. I don't want to truck my animals hours away to people I don't know and entrust them with my animals. I want local services provided by people I can talk with and get to know. If any slaughter facility that comes to Auburn is not staffed by caring professional people, it will fail.

The city manager and most everyone else says Auburn needs business. Here we have a viable business that wants to come to town. The answers to residents concerns are all readily available through state and federal agencies. This is not a conceptual business. They are actually in operation in other cities and towns in Maine. Go to those facilities and look around, there is nothing sinister about them. They are owned and operated by hardworking people doing an honest days work.

Advertisement