Police: Clean cars or face fines

LEWISTON — Police see it all the time: snow covering a good part of the windshield of a vehicle that is being driven.

Snow-covered car
Russ Dillingham/Sun Journal

A car, covered with snow, makes its way down Lisbon Street in Lewiston on Thursday morning.

The snow on the windshield of a vehicle going down Lisbon Street on Thursday was illegal, police said. The driver could have been pulled over and issued a $135 fine, officer Craig Johnson said.

Maine law says windshields and windows have to be “100 percent clear.” Any snow or ice diminishes visibility and creates a safety risk. Motor vehicles are designed to give drivers a 360-degree view.

“There are two main causes of accidents during and after a storm: road conditions and reduced visibility,” Johnson said. Vehicles that are not cleared of snow are a contributing factor to lack of visibility.

In the case of the vehicle on Lisbon Street on Thursday morning, the driver likely cleaned the windshield but not the roof, Johnson said. As the car warmed, snow slid from the roof onto the windshield. That's why it's important that drivers clean not just the windshield, but the roof, side windows and rear window before driving.

Keeping a car completely clear during a storm can be tough, and police use discretion, Johnson said. But too often, the day after a storm, drivers become “lazy” and don't do a good job of removing snow and ice before driving, he said.

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

ScottPerry's picture
verified

Northwoods & KEWP

Northwoods - No I did not realize there was a law on the books stating that headlights must be on if you can't be seen from 1000 feet away - thanks for the info.

KEWP - Higher taxes and insurance - Well I wonder if Stephen King has trouble paying his own medical bills... Oh How about the former President of the United States George Bush? Do you suppose they can't afford the higher cost of medical attention? As for me, well you have no idea if I can pay higher medical costs or not. Do our children who ride a school bus wear seat belts? There are other methods to accomplish things but everyone turns to the government to pass laws when common sense is not forthcoming. That is NOT what our founding fathers wanted when they drafted our consititution.

Genisek2004's picture
verified

"Could have been pulled over and issued a fine..."

so why weren't they? How is it that we practice a law at our convenience?

KEWP's picture

seatbelt

Not wearing your seatbelt puts more than just yourself in danger, it puts others indanger of higher taxes and insurance costs, when you get thrown from the vehicle and do not have insurance or $$ to cover the expense of saving your life....

ScottPerry's picture
verified

How about the law that requires lights on when wipers in use???

I do NOT disagree with making sure that drivers are clearing their windshields and other windows. I would like to know why the Police do not enforce the "Lights on when wipers are in use" law however. They enforce the seatbelt law - which If I am not wearing my seat belt it does NOT place anyone other than me in increased danger. But they do not ticket people for not using their lights.

Furthermore, even though it is not a law, People should have enough common sense to put their lights on when foggy, raining, snowing etc. On my way to work the other day, during the Nor' Easter (I have a job that cannot shut down because of weather), I pass several oncoming cars in near whiteout conditions with not lights on. Some of these cars were white - in a major snowstorm - with no lights on. That places everyone at risk of accidents. I know you can't legislate common sense, but come on people (those who refuse to put their lights on), you should use that common sense without someone forcing you to.

northwoods's picture

Scott, you do realize that

Scott, you do realize that Maine has both laws. One saying if you wipers are on the headlights must be. Also if weather conditions are so that you can not be seen from a 1000 ft. away you must have headlights on as well.

Thehedgeclipper's picture
verified

Well said Scott

I plow for a living and encounter numerous vehicles without any lights on. It's pretty nerve racking when you don't see them till they're within fifty feet of you and traveling at 40 mph.

MJF's picture
verified

How about frost

They should also include frost in their description. Way to many times I have seen vehicles that have frost covered windshield and the driver is looking through a hole they quickly scraped or looking through the steering wheel out the bottom of the windshield.

While cleaning, don't forget the side windows and mirrors so you can see to pull out into traffic safely.

Hymn's picture
verified

Bout time

Its about time.

Ginger1's picture

GOOD

This is long overdue. It is a safety issue.

sourdough's picture
verified

KEEP

Keep up the good job ? That's go for all the city Vehicle's ????? ALSO RIGHT ????/

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...