Town councilor balks at paying excise tax

LISBON — A town councilor vowed Monday night to continue fighting an excise tax bill from the town that resulted from an error at the town office.

Councilors voted 3-2 last Tuesday to authorize Town Manager Steve Eldridge to withhold $138.16 from Councilor Roger Cote's stipend to cover the excise tax bill on his truck.

Cote recused himself from voting to avoid a conflict, but asked to speak as a citizen on the issue and was allowed to.

He explained in a phone interview Monday night that he bought a new pickup truck in the spring of 2009 and sold his 2007 vehicle. At that time, he transferred his registration from the older vehicle to the newer one, since it was still good for six months. He also paid the difference in the excise tax, since the tax for 2007 truck was lower than the tax for the newer one.

In early 2010, he went to re-register the 2009 vehicle. He received the registration, but, "I didn't look at it, just put it in the glove box," he said.

In mid-2010, he took the truck to a dealer for inspection. The dealer told him they couldn't inspect the vehicle, because the registration was for the 2007 vehicle he had sold a year earlier, according to Cote. The town had pulled up the previous vehicle's information from the computerized records, he said.

Cote returned to the Town Office and discussed the registration mix-up with town officials. They issued a new registration for the 2009 truck and validated it, indicating that all financial obligations had been met, Cote said.

A month later, Cote received a letter from the town stating that he again owed $138.16, the difference between the excise tax of a 2007 truck and a 2009 truck.

He told the council that he didn't feel he owed the tax, because he had paid for a registration in early 2010 and was given a document for a vehicle that he did not actually own. "I was very upset. The town office had made the error. They had re-registered the 2007 truck and put me on the road with illegal plates. I could have gotten in a lot of trouble if I had taken it out of state," he said.

Cote said he called state officials but no one knew what to do about it. When he went back to the town office to re-register his truck this year, he was told he couldn't register it until he had paid the difference in the 2010 excise tax.

He presented one check for the difference of two vehicles' excise tax for 2010 and a second one for the current registration, he said. Cote said he then placed a second call to the state but still didn't feel he owed the money and placed a stop-payment order on his check for the last year's tax.

At the council meeting Tuesday, Eldridge, who is also tax collector and treasurer, pointed out it was a mistake when Cote was not charged the excise tax last year. Receipts are balanced at the end of each day, he added, and when a mistake is found, officials rectify it, he said.

Part of the issue was Cote's decision to stop payment on the check.

Town attorney Roger Therriault referenced two sections in state law — one establishing the obligation of the tax collector to collect taxes, and the other permitting municipal officers to authorize withholding the amount owed the town out of any money that is due and payable to the taxpayer.

"I think the whole thing was petty," and the town should have dropped the matter long ago, Cote said Monday night.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

hacstingray's picture
verified

tax tax tax

Well only in Lisbon would this happen. I used to live there for 30 yrs and had to move because I just couldn't fix STUPID. The town never make a mistake its always the tax payers problem. Well when i took the town to the PUC about a false water bill the PUC favored me and told the town to change there water meters that were more then 10 yrs old. I also didn't pay the water bill in the amount of $300 plus. To this day the town never said it was there mistake. If someone can find a way to fix STUPID please call the town office and see how fast that will get fixed ONLY IN LISBON never a dull moment.

Bosocked71's picture
verified

Who's gonna pay?

Does Mr. Cote expect the taxpayers to pay what he rightfully owes. Mistakes are mistakes. Voting him into office was the biggest of all.

larryt39's picture
verified

Councilor being held hostage over $138.16

Obviously the two had an oversight, and the State officials, didn't know what or how to handle it?

Was it worth it to, spread this issue over the state, all about $138.16. Doubt it. Perhaps there are more pressing issues, between Councilor's?

logan3110's picture

Yes

Perhaps a town councillor feeling the brunt of mistakes by government officials will make changes in law that demand competency from public servants. And it is refreshing to know that Mr. Eldridge sided on the right side of the issue. If the taxes had of been done right the first time, or if Mr. Cote had of payed them when it was brought to his attention, this wouldn't be a story. You don't get to skip out on taxes and debt because of clerical errors. My name doesn't get spelled right half the time, does this give me an excuse to not pay my bills? I would also like to add I am personally biased, as I have asked the Lisbon town office repeatedly to change my mailing address to Maine. They continue to send my bills to North Carolina, where I used to live. Three requests, and this time it's in writing. If they don't change the address, I will probably never receive the bills, but I will still have to pay them.

Advertisement