AUGUSTA — Secretary of State Charles Summers on Wednesday testified in favor of a bill requiring candidates for elected office to provide additional proof of U.S. citizenship.
Critics blasted the proposal as a political stunt stemming from President Barack Obama's so-called "birther" controversy.
Rep. Richard Cebra, R-Naples, is sponsoring LD 34, which as written would require public office candidates to show birth certificates in addition to driver's licenses or other government-issued identification documents to the Secretary of State's Office before qualifying for the ballot.
Currently, candidates for public office sign voter registration applications that ask them if they're U.S. citizens. The citizenship prerequisite is also included in the state Constitution for candidates running for the Legislature, governor and congressional offices.
Cebra's bill adds another verification layer to the current affidavit process.
During a public hearing before the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee, some critics said the proposal was bureaucratic and unnecessary; others said the bill takes aim at immigrants and people of color.
"In a media world where perception is reality, this anti-diversity measure is a national public relations disgrace for Maine people," said Ralph Carmona of The League of United Latino American Citizens.
Carmona said the bill "pandered to the worst part of our instincts," adding that it's "an irresponsible effort rooted in an extremist claim aimed at America's first African-American president."
After the hearing, Cebra said the bill was not related to the proliferation of so-called "birther" bills that have been advanced by GOP legislators in other states, a series of proposals driven by questions about Obama's citizenship.
"I have no interest in the birther idea, although it did raise the questions about the House and Senate candidates," Cebra said.
"It's 'trust but verify,'" he said. "I don't trust people. I prefer to verify what people do and who they are."
Critics of the proposal said Cebra's bill, and Summers' endorsement of it, was political pandering that attempted to solve a nonexistent problem.
Rep. Michael Carey, D-Lewiston, was one of the most vocal opponents during the committee hearing. After Summers testified that the proposal was not "onerous," Carey questioned how the bill would affect naturalized citizens who are born in another country and don't have birth certificates.
Carey also questioned the political motives of the proposal. During the hearing, he read to Summers testimony from former Secretary of State Matt Dunlap, who testified to an identical bill sponsored by Cebra last year. According to Dunlap's written testimony, he said his office was not aware of any candidates whose citizenship status had been questioned and "requesting proof of citizenship for these candidates seems unnecessary" and "redundant."
After Carey read Dunlap's testimony, Summers said Dunlap's opinion was from a different administration. He said new leadership in Augusta would yield new policy direction.
After the hearing, Carey said, "The secretary of state made it clear that this only came forward when there was a change in the political party," Carey said. "There's no noncitizen that's seeking to get on the ballot. This is a hypothetical issue. ... I think this is simply a political bill. I think the Legislature would be ill-advised to act upon it because it would trample on basic rights."
He added, "There's currently a constitutional requirement that candidates are U.S. citizens."
Cebra, however, said the state's affidavit verification isn't sufficient to prevent noncitizens from getting on the ballot.
"Signing an affidavit is a lot different than certifying the petition to get on the ballot," he said. "How stupid would the secretary of state look if he certified something and it turned out the candidate wasn't who they said they were?"
Alysia Melnick of the Maine Civil Liberties Union said Cebra's bill would add "unwarranted and unnecessary government intrusion" for citizens.
In her written testimony, Melnick said the oaths required under Maine citizenship were a sufficient check.
Carmona of The League of United Latino American Citizens provided the strongest condemnation of the bill, saying it was akin to the "moral clause" of the Jim Crow laws of the South and the "loyalty oath" of the Cold War.
Rep. Jarrod Crockett, R-Bethel, took issue with Carmona's comments, saying it insulted Cebra. After Crockett asked Carmona about his drive to Augusta, he asked if Carmona, of Mexican descent, found applying for a driver's license offensive, adding that Cebra's bill would entail the same process.
Carmona asked why that process was necessary.
"What is the purpose of raising this issue?" he said. "This bill originated from questions about the citizenship of the president of this country."
Debbie Barry of Lisbon Falls testified against the bill because she said it didn't go far enough. She said she didn't want to be "hoodwinked" by candidates who couldn't prove who they were.
Barry is cited as a tea party activist on the Maine Refounders website and has appeared in news accounts of various rallies.
Summers said there are no documented cases in which noncitizens have made it onto a Maine ballot. However, he equated Cebra's bill to the Transportation Security Administration checkpoints at airports, which he said had resulted in "no terrorists flying on our planes."
"This bill just amplifies what's in the Constitution," Summers said.
The bill is scheduled for another work session, during which Cebra is expected to accept some language changes that would make it easier for naturalized citizens to qualify for a ballot.
Cebra's bill has eight co-sponsors, including Republican Reps. Dale Crafts of Lisbon Falls, Aaron Libby of Waterboro and Lance Harvell of Farmington.

anyone who believes a non
anyone who believes a non citizen could get on the ballot without the republican hatchet men crucifying them, is living in la-la land.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.A little vigilance is good
A little vigilance is good for the soul, T....
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I would rather candidates pass a test on.....
Constitutional Knowledge.
Then Representative Cebra would know that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution would render L.D. 58 - which he sponsored - including the following - unenforcable.
Besides making him a complete laughing stock of everyone besides tea-partiests
http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/bills_125th/billtexts/HP0051...
"§ 7002. Prohibition
1. Violation by federal official. An official, agent or employee of the United States Government or an employee of a corporation providing services to the United States Government who enforces or attempts to enforce the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148 or any order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States Government made in connection with that Act is guilty of a Class C crime.
2. Violation by state official. A public official, agent or employee of the State who enforces or attempts to enforce the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148 or any order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States Government made in connection with that Act is guilty of a Class D crime."
Sorry Kiddies, Maine Law doesn't trump Federal Law. Federal Law created Maine.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Not what we need
What we need is for candidates to be open and honest about their personal finances. I would propose that anyone running for state office be required to open their personal and family finances, including tax returns, investments and property ownership, to the scrutiny of the media and the public.
Wouldn't it be interesting to find out how much money the LePage family had shifted to investments in Florida (and it's no income tax), or why Mr LePage owned no automobiles at the time of his election, or who owns all the land that will become a new hospital and higway access in Augusta?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Disturbing
I find Secretary of State Summers' comments very disturbing. Politics should not enter into this kind of discussion. The fact that it did, says that we are trying to implement polcies based on political viewpoints. I think we should not change the law because the process of running for office is very open and difficult already.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.