LePage orders new state regulations to go through him

AUGUSTA — When it comes to approving new state regulations, Gov. Paul LePage wants the buck to stop at him.

That has some people — environmentalists in particular — concerned.

LePage this week signed an executive order that empowers the governor to delay and alter rule-making procedures at all state agencies if he deems them too costly to enforce, already addressed by federal law or an impediment to job creation.

The governor signed a similar order immediately after taking office in January. However, that order applied to rules already in the pipeline. The new directive applies to new regulations that state agencies might consider, such as adding chemicals to the Kid-Safe Product Act or efforts to strengthen environmental or natural resources regulations.

Critics say the law raises a host of concerns, including a potential conflict with separation of powers in the state constitution, because, they say the order would allow LePage to circumvent the legislative process of vetting and adopting rule-making.

The same argument was levied against Florida Republican Gov. Rick Scott, who has taken nearly identical steps to influence regulations in the Sunshine State. Last week, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that Scott had overstepped his constitutional authority. The plaintiff in the case was a blind woman who argued that Scott's executive order hampered a process that made it easier for her to obtain food stamps.

Several groups joined the case, including the Audubon Society.

In Maine, major state agency regulations are proposed and adopted or rejected by the Legislature and committees of jurisdiction through a public hearing and committee process that often includes input from the governor's administration or Cabinet.

One provision of LePage's order suspends public review and comments on  proposed rules until the governor allows the rule-making to proceed. Any subsequent changes would also have to be approved by the governor.

"It's almost as if the governor now has veto power to stop a regulation before it even has a public hearing," said Sean Mahoney, an attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation, an environmental advocacy group.

Sen. Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, the ranking Democrat on the Legislature's Environmental Committee, said the order subjects rule-making to the influence of outside interests of which the public may not be aware. He added that those interests might opt to lobby the executive branch rather than participate in public hearings inherent in the committee process.

"We need to make sure our regulations are adopted in a transparent way," Goodall said. "They shouldn't be made vulnerable to intense lobbying from special interests on both sides of the issue."

Goodall said the public also wouldn't know how the governor was determining whether a regulation inhibited job creation or was too costly.

Michael Cianchette, the governor's deputy legal counsel, countered that the order stipulates that regulations deemed to impede job growth or other criteria would be explained in writing and made available to the public.

"The order itself is very clear that any findings to be made under the criteria are to be put forth, and that is certainly a public record that can be asked for or received by any member of the public," said Cianchette, adding that correspondence with the governor's office was also subject to Maine's Freedom of Access Act.

But Mahoney said FOAA requests can take time and wouldn't capture verbal conversations between the administration and an organization that had an interest in stopping a regulation but perhaps no desire to make that effort public.

Mahoney also questioned why the order was necessary, given that state agencies and their commissioners already serve at the pleasure of the governor. And, given that the governor is required to sign or veto regulations approved by the Legislature, his administration's position carries significant weight in the public process, Mahoney said.

"As far as I know, most agencies already include in their thinking such criteria as impacts on job creation and cost of implementation," said Mahoney, adding that the governor presumably appoints members to his Cabinet with regulatory expertise and that commissioners are often backed by professional staff.

"Where's that expertise in the governor's office?" he said.

Cianchette said the administration relied on its Cabinet members to be the experts in their respective policy areas and to work closely with their staff to put forward rules that are good for all of Maine.

"But like anything, it's good to get another set of eyeballs on something," he said. "Bringing in another party ensures that there is a coherent, coordinated policy moving forward and things aren't advancing piecemeal."

Mahoney referred to the outside interests that influenced the governor's proposals in LD 1, the so-called regulatory reform package. Several reports eventually linked LePage's amendment to that bill to a prominent lobbying firm that had represented chemical and pharmaceutical companies.

A detailed report published in the Portland Phoenix showed that such influence was widespread in the administration. The author obtained the information through a sizable FOAA request that took the administration months to comply with.

Mahoney said the executive order created a lot of "room for mischief."

Cianchette  said the order was simply a continuation of the governor's pledge to streamline regulations and promote job growth.

smistler@sunjournal.com

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

CLAIRE GAMACHE's picture

Another bad idea

I guess if you wanted to create a huge bottleneck and insure that nothing gets done this would be the best way to do it. I think if the governor had any skill in selecting the people who work for him, he wouldn't have to do so much micro-managing. This notion that he gets to throw out any regulations he doesn't like before anyone else gets a look at them sort of reminds you of the guy who always has to be first in line at the buffet table.

 's picture

Take him to court

Most rulemaking has very strict timelines. LePage could disrupt this timeline. Plus, LePage is overstepping his authority. This administration continues to astound me with their lack of protocol to get whatever they want. I think they need to be taken to court. Let the courts stop this ridiculous action.

 's picture

Major and substantative rules

I believe that,§8072, "Legislative review of major substantive rules" was adopted to prevent state agencies from implementing rules with the power of law without input from the committees of jurisdiction. The Gov's people already have oversight of all dept. operations. Does this action by Gov. LePage undermine the legislature's final say on major rulemaking? The committees hear first hand public testimony not just concerns from the Gov.'s friends.

KRIS KUCERA's picture

The ultimate irony

It's amazing that LePage, the GOP, and the TEA Party are darlings of the not only the rich and Big Business, but also people without college degrees earning $24,000 or less a year. The irony is, why an earth do the lower socioeconomic classes think that corporations give a damn about the common people? Decreased regulations will not mean more better-paying jobs in Maine. It will mean less workers' rights, safeguards, and opportunities. Why can't common people on the right see that the rich and the corporations are simply using the common folk, via the TEA Party and other outlets as a means to an end (i.e., boots on the ground), namely to make even more profit? Too bad Americans forget that the last armed insurrection in this country was the Battle of Blair Mountain, which revolved around miner safety and pay in West Virginia. Why was the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 passed? Because of Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle," which exposed the ruthlessness of the meatpacking plants in Chicago that exploited workers and posed serious health threats. Maybe pick up a copy of Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath"?!?

It is a sad irony that the people who are most apt to be exploited by corporations and the Powers That Be are often on the side of corporations and the Powers That Be. I posit that the large majority of TEA Partiers are on, or have loved ones who are on, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, yet they want to purge the government, eliminate regulation, and privatize benefits, when in fact, doing so would take away the safety nets that so many everyday Americans -- namely the poor and lower middle class -- and they themselves rely on.

Simply mindboggling, really, that the lower economic classes actually think LePage is on their side. If he remembered his roots, he wouldn't be suck a huge target for corporate lobbyists and shills.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...