Congressional failure

Once again, Congress is failing to address the needs of the American people. Members apparently believe that Americans are uninformed and lack intelligence. That could not be further from the truth.

While running for election, congressional hopefuls presented a hopeful picture and were accessible to the voters. Now that elections are over, it is a whole different story. They have their jobs, their houses, benefits and expense accounts, paid for by taxpayers. They appear to have turned their backs on the public.

When someone comes up with an idea that would help this country get back on its feet, Congress has responded with opposition, stone-walling, lack of cooperation, and favoring the few to the detriment of the many.

That is totally unacceptable.

Social Security and Medicare have been dipped into for decades. How is it considered legal to borrow against money that is not theirs to spend? That approach would be the equivalent of a person using his neighbor's house as collateral to purchase a home for himself without the neighbor's permission.

Measures must be taken right now to prevent that practice from continuing, now and in the future.

I am disillusioned by certain Republicans who appear to be acting childishly. They remind me of 2-year-olds who insist that things go their way or not at all.

Congress has an obligation and responsibility to work to improve the lives of Americans while they have the opportunity to do so. That should be done in a fair-minded manner.

Peggy Belkenny, Auburn

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

veritas's picture
verified

Report Finds No Evidence Syria Hid Iraqi Arms

Rev Jim's picture
verified

Mr. Rimi

your reliance on conspiracy laden, skewed reports are laughable! You probably believe the report from the "Warren commission" as truth also.

veritas's picture
verified

Let me guess....

You take the Bible as Gospel.....

Ed McCaffrey's picture
verified

"Congress has an obligation

"Congress has an obligation and responsibility to work to improve the lives of Americans while they have the opportunity to do so."

Nothing that I've read anywhere says that it is the job of Congress to improve the lives of Americans. I can't recall reading anywhere in the Constitution that it was the job of congress or the government to "PROVIDE general welfare". It says "PROMOTE the general welfare, which is a completely different thing.
The only people responsible for improving the lives of Americans are Americans themselves. Quit whining and expecting someone else to make your life better.

Pirate's picture
verified

Good post, Ed. Right on

Good post, Ed. Right on target.

Jason's picture
verified

Not without permission

"Social Security and Medicare have been dipped into for decades. How is it considered legal to borrow against money that is not theirs to spend? That approach would be the equivalent of a person using his neighbor's house as collateral to purchase a home for himself without the neighbor's permission."

They did it WITH permission because they were voted into office. And was it a big deal in the next election? Nope. Because the debt wasn't a big deal. But now that the debt is coming due, it is an epically huge deal.

auburn homeowner's picture
verified

So true Jason...

... why is it so easy to enact selfish and often frivelous(if we truly look at what we NEED) programs that screw our long term solvency and screw the next generation. We are feeling the pain from programs that were instituted decades ago, now. A possible answer is that politicians think in 2-4 year blocks and more interested in instant gratification. That gets the votes now.

tron's picture

let's face the facts, the

let's face the facts, the debt wasn't a big deal while the republicans were accruing it, it only became an issue when President Obama came into office.

auburn homeowner's picture
verified

....came into office..

... At an alarming rate never before seen in modern society. Dan it's always been a big deal. If you agree then I recommend Herman Cain as a potential presidential candidate for '12... but he attends tea party rallies and how could you vote for an obvious racist.

veritas's picture
verified

An alarming rate...

Interest compounds.

That's what Bush forgot when he accrued all that debt which he saddled Obama with. Did you go along with those B.S. wars George got us into, Joe?? What a bunch of crap! Obama should have had us out of Afghanistan years ago.

rdarluv's picture
verified

but he didn't because once he

but he didn't because once he got to office, he was "educated" of the facts.

veritas's picture
verified

And the fact is......

History has never been kind to any country or civilization that has stuck it's nose into what is now known as modern day 'Afghanistan'

None have ever succeeded in imposing their culture or civilization. Google "Graveyard of Empires"

rdarluv's picture
verified

War is never

War is never kind.....anywhere.

veritas's picture
verified

It's on my book-shelf now ;)

"War is Kind" - Stephen Crane, Stokes & Co, NY, 1899 1st Ed, octavo, illustrated by Will Bradley (line drawings); bound in printed paper over boards and spine, with paper spine label; 96 pp; thick gray wove deckle edge paper, a number of decorations, some full page illustrations. Crane's second book of poetry, and Will Bradley's Art Nouveau masterpiece, printed by him at the University Press, Cambridge. Owner's inscription, spine discolored, with minor paper loss at head and tail of spine, as is usual for this title.

Susan Otis Thompson, in 'American Book Design and William Morris,' her landmark study of books of this era, considers 'War is Kind' to be one of Bradley's masterworks.

"[Bradley] has been much talked about as an artist but not analyzed for typographic development. After the early period of traditional realism, he adopted around 1893 the Beardsley/Kelmscott style of 'Le Morte d'Arthur' and turned it eventually, after incorperating influences from other artists, into his own brand of Art Nouveau that culminated in the gloomy masterpiece War is Kind"

Price on Request

auburn homeowner's picture
verified

Fact is Ron...

...is that George Bush might have been a Republican but he wasn't a conservative. His expansion of the Fed. & its debt is what made me realize that I'm not a (R), that and the bible thumping. Avenge 9/11 and get Osama? absolutely. Occupy a backwards country that is tribal and convert it to democracry while hunting Osama for 10 years? A tad ethnocentric if you ask me and overkill. Iraq was a mistake but I believe more from ignorance than from malicious intent. Regardless, the result is the same. I've been saying for a couple years now that the only thing Obama would need to do to get re-elected is to bring back the troops from Afghanistan and start drilling for oil domesticaly. I know the enviromental part of the liberal mindset would be offended but it would help the economy/jobs as well as if not remove, atleast diminish the need for us to maintain a standing army in the middle east. Thats the kicker Ron, most people can't grasp that my dissaproval isn't a default approval of our previous administration. They were both wrong. The (D) & (R) are accomplices in the crime against the citinzenry. I will vote for the candidate that will decrease the size of government. You're a smart guy Ron, all societys rise and fall. My question is, historically what leads to the demise of Republics?

veritas's picture
verified

Our demise...

We don't have the guts to raise taxes to what they were under Reagan.

The only countries who pay less % of their GDP in taxes than ours are Mexico and Turkey.* If we don't raise our taxes on those who can afford it, we deserve our fate.

*http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Tax-VOX/2011/0209/Corporate-tax-only-a-piece-of-tax-revenue-pie

Pirate's picture
verified

"It's unfair to raise taxes

"It's unfair to raise taxes on one segment and not the rest. If we're gonna raise them, raise them on EVERYBODY---the rich, the middle class (what's left of it), and the poor, right down to the very last one. Tax their welfare benefits, but make them pay taxes like everyone else. Taxes should be for EVERYONE, not just those who 'can afford it'", sez the parrot, a free-radical thinking liberal.

veritas's picture
verified

You can watch the poor pay taxes.

Watch them buy cigarettes. Somehow they don't seem to have got the word about lung cancer et al. No matter how hard you hit them in the head with 'Sin Taxes'

Pirate's picture
verified

How does that work? If you're

How does that work? If you're gonnna be poor; smoke your blues away? I don't get it.

veritas's picture
verified

Neither do I....

Not smart enough to quit, nor smart enough to escape poverty. Perhaps it goes hand in hand???

Pirate's picture
verified

Don't know about that. We've

Don't know about that. We've both seen some highly successful and otherwise intelligent people smoking cigarettes. Not sure it has anything to do with being smart. I guess tobacco is pretty addictive to some. Unfortunately, some of those addicted are among those who can least afford to be addicted. Tough chain to break.

Pirate's picture
verified

When the Pirate quit, they

When the Pirate quit, they were 69 cents a pack. Now, a pack a day will pay for a vacation.

veritas's picture
verified

Can't agree.....

Iraq was 'malicious intent' from the beginning.

Go back to PNAC - Project for the New American Century - and it's Statement of Principles released back in 1997. Signatories included such notable Bush Administration figures such as Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, 'Scooter' Libby and William Bennett.

Do you recall V.P. Cheney's 'Secret Energy Task Force Meetings' ?? In 2001 - even before the 9/11 attacks, Cheney conducted secret meetings in which maps of Iraqi oil fields were researched along with information regarding 'foreign suitors' for Iraqi oil contracts. See CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE DOCUMENTS FEATURE MAP OF IRAQI OILFIELDS

These people had 'Foreign Misadventures' on their minds long before we were attacked.

Pirate's picture
verified

Whadday mean, Joe? NOT voting

Whadday mean, Joe? NOT voting for Herman could make one a racist. 0O:-)

auburn homeowner's picture
verified

Exactly Pirate!!

That's why I could never be a person named Dan Breton... does not compute, does not compute, overloading....BOOM! Liberal logic only works in liberal circles. The Elephant in the room seems to always get ignored with Dan and his Clan... Facts are such a nuisance when your trying to create a false narrative about certain people or groups.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Dan seems to forget the huge

Dan seems to forget the huge spike in national debt. on Bush's watch took place during the last two years. He also seems to forget that the president doesn't hold the purse strings, congress does. Who controlled congress during those last two years?? Who controlled it during Obuma's first two when we broke the all time record for a single year increase in national debt? Which party??

veritas's picture
verified

Bush kept asking for money....

And asking, and asking, and asking.

Had Congress turned him down, they would have been tarred with the 'Unpatriotic Brush' the Republicans kept right alongside their 'Freedom Fries' - 'Yellow-Cake' - 'WMD's' - and 'Nerve Gas' that somehow never existed.....

Pirate's picture
verified

You mean the ones that were

You mean the ones that were flown into Syria in the dead of night by Russian transports, while Sadam took advantage of the six months notice we gave him that we were coming?
Can you imagine the outcome if we had given the Japs 6 months notice that we were gonna drop a couple of huge atomic bombs on two of their largest cities?

rdarluv's picture
verified

Imagine the outcome had the

Imagine the outcome had the Japs given us 6 months notice before attacking Pearl Harbor? What would we have done?? Oh I don't know, maybe prepare for them??

Pirate's picture
verified

Maybe, but the point is

Maybe, but the point is arguable. All accounts of events leading up to the attack are not in agreement. Some indicate that Roosevelt knew an attack by the Japanese was imminent, but chose not to act. Other accounts present what went down differently. The movie, Tora,Tora,Tora seemed to present a fairly plausible account of the events leading up to the attack, and was considered at that time, to be one of the more accurate depictions of what took place on that infamous day and the events leading up to it, but who knows. Everything has spin on it now, so revisionist history tends to rule.

rdarluv's picture
verified

The key word there is "some".

The key word there is "some". There will always be "some" "government cover up" activists no matter what. Look at 9-11.....

veritas's picture
verified

We had plenty of notice

We simply chose to ignore it.

After invading Manchuria and China, Japan signed a treaty with Germany and Italy in September of 1940. We had a 'Heads Up' and imposed sanctions on them - but didn't take a military threat seriously.

rdarluv's picture
verified

case in point....

case in point....

auburn homeowner's picture
verified

ok

I can follow with that. Fact is though that previously there had been gas that was used on the kurds. Did they send it to Syria?? Don't know..but it was generally excepted that he did have it at the time.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Yes, the "reliable" source of

Yes, the "reliable" source of the intel was Sadam himself. He admitted to keeping the rumor of his WMD alive in order to "protect" his people from Iran and keep him in power.......they hung him about a week later. --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB-bsoywWEg

rdarluv's picture
verified

Our republican congress has

Our republican congress has no problem standing up to our Democrat president. Grow some balls.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...