A New York Times reporter introduced us last week to Tammy Yancey, a $9.50-an-hour gas station attendant for Sam's Club in Pinellas Park, Fla.
Walmart, which also operates Sam's Club, had just announced sweeping health insurance cuts and premium increases for its one million employees.
Those increases included a steep penalty for employees who smoke.
Yancey, a smoker who earns $12,000 a year, would see her annual health insurance premiums more than double to $3,325, about a quarter of her income.
"I really can't go without insurance," she told the Times, "because I have a heart problem.
Yancey epitomizes the rapidly emerging health care crisis in the U.S.:
* A nation of people who cannot or will not take common-sense measures to protect their own health;
* Employers who are increasingly unwilling or unable to foot the bill for ever-more-expensive health care; and
* State and federal governments increasingly swamped in medical bills for the sickest people, the poor and the elderly.
The result is a health-care system that is, in the words of a leading health policy research foundation, lagging further and further behind other industrialized nations in quality, efficiency and access to care.
The Commonwealth Fund reported last week that Americans are far more likely to die than the citizens of other countries from preventable or treatable conditions: bacterial infections, screenable cancers, diabetes and complications from surgery.
The U.S. recorded 96 preventable deaths per 100,000 people in 2006-2007. France, meanwhile, reported 55.
In important areas like controlling blood sugar in diabetes patients, newborn mortality and childhood obesity, the U.S. continues to trail other national systems.
And the situation has likely worsened since then. In 2010, 81 million Americans were either uninsured or underinsured at some point in the year. That's up from 65 million in 2003.
"The U.S. ranks last out of 16 industrialized countries on a measure of mortality amenable to medical care," according to the report.
The lamentable conclusion: "As many as 91,000 fewer people would die prematurely if the U.S. could achieve the leading country rate."
Except for improvement in a few select areas, like hospital-acquired infections, the U.S. is going in the wrong direction.
In Texas, for instance, more than 25 percent of its citizens are now uninsured. A third of its children did not receive an annual physical or a teeth cleaning in 2007. One in five senior citizens ends up back in the hospital within a month after a major procedure.
By almost any measure, this system is broken. Meanwhile, the only significant attempt to change that picture, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, is being challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court by 23 states.
And in an election year, there seems to be little interest in revisiting the issue.
That's inexcusable.
In another two years, will we be even further behind other similar countries?
There's little to indicate otherwise.
The opinions expressed in this column reflect the views of the ownership and editorial board.



Another Useless Article
Again the Journal has fail its readers. You take a NYT as gospel? To me if write something thats negative then you should write solutions.So far as I have read this article as an opinion I really read it as a rant with no substance. Here we have another Liberal proclaiming something with little proof, example: The result is a health-care system that is, in the words of a leading health policy research foundation, lagging further and further behind other industrialized nations in quality, efficiency and access to care. Who is this research foundation?? anyone can put anything into an article to justify their wrtings.
Plain and simple Journalism from Al Gore!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Health care system sick and getting sicker
. .. It's just too b e a u r o c r a t i c -- far too much paper work to fill out and submit . Then there's the HIPAA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Insurance_Portability_and_Accountabi... Maybe we'll go to la Canada where it's ƒree :) e . g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicko What goes around comes around /s, Dr. Dosh , HI u s a b t w - tea partiers ; The jury is still out on Obamacare ® Although Dr. Ron Paul practiced in TX for free for many years as an obstetrician we would not want to receive health care or education there . .. .it ranks 4 9 th out of 5 0 in these very United States
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yancey has a heart problem
Yancey has a heart problem but continues to smoke...Duh!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If she's smoking a pack a
If she's smoking a pack a day, she's probably spending another $2400 of her $12,000 annual income on gaspers. So, she's spending $2400 a year to kill herself and $300 a year to keep herself alive. Yikes..
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Make that $3300 a year to
Make that $3300 a year to keep herself alive. (Damn parrot. I know I shouldn't have let him type it)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What next?
Nice list of stats, but no answers to any of the problems.
Come on United States, join Maine, or recently passed health care reform package in essence says this. Trust the free market, allow big incredbly wealthy health insurers to voluntarily lower the prices they charge and get more people covered with affordable insurance that promotes preventative care! Oh, yea, forgot, that's what we've been doing for generations,,, hasn't worked yet,,, worn't work this time. LePage has led us down the fools path.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.How's Baldacci's Dirigo plan
How's Baldacci's Dirigo plan working?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.PRETTY DARN WELL
Over 35,000 Mainers have been enrolled in the plan. If you take a look at overall cost to maine residents for health care insurance over the past 10 years you will see that rates here went up at slower rates than those of states surrounding us. In that time Maine has gone from having the highest rates for health insurance coverage, to having the lowest rates of any state in the northeast. So while Mr LePage and his party minions will tell you differently to support their effort and laying the cash cow of health insurance at the feel of the insurance companies, Dirigo Health has actually helped the entire state in easing health care costs. And guess what, the Dirigo plan has not cost people not enrolled a single dime. Now Mr LePage's plan does have a pretty healthy tax attached to it, doesn't it?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Actually the plan does in
Actually the plan does in fact cost all Mainers in two separate ways - first some of the costs are covered through INCOME & SALES TAXES and second a fee is charged to all other carriers which subsidizes the DIRIGO option. If anyone thinks the carrier does not pass on that cost to their consumers in the form of higher premiums than I would suggest they are benefittting from medical merijuana usage. Why do people insist ona plan that is cheaper to purchase would suddenly not cost someone at some point?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Here's a simple explanation
Here's a simple explanation of how Dirigo works...lets say bread costs $2.00 but some people in our society simply cant afford $2.00 a loaf. Suddenly the government has a great idea to subsidize the cost of a specific brand of bread and only charge $1.00 per loaf. Does it cost less to make the bread?(NO), Does it cost less to deliver the bread (NO) is there suddenly no management costs for the bread company (Have you seen administrative salaries at Dirigo, um I mean the bread company?) So whats the next option - tax the rest of us creating a subsidized product, but then suddenly you want to expand because this is SO GOOD for those who now purchase so you find a new want to subsidize by charging all the other bread companies ten cents a loaf to go back to you so they can keep doing business - you think they eat that cost - nope, their bread now costs $2.10. And for that last kicker - how come people who could afford to buy bread at retail pricing are instead allowed to buy Dirigo, er ah bread from the subsidy? Thus guarenteeing some of the bread companies dont have enough business to stay viable...Yup, thats a lot of dough!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.How rare...a response that
How rare...a response that makes sense, and not a single insult. Thank you Mr. Donald.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.maybe you should try it once
maybe you should try it once in a while, oh I forgot what you are,sorry
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (5)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.BTW, that Agree is invalid. I
BTW, that Agree is invalid. I hit it by mistake in attempting to press the Disagree. You owe me one.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.you can rescind it now by
you can rescind it now by clicking it again.....
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Careful, you came pretty
Careful, you came pretty close to walking the plank that time. Where it not for 'two for Tuesday', you'd have been out there.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.better than taliban paul's
better than taliban paul's plan
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Running up and down the scale
Running up and down the scale like a little piano player aren't we.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Health Care System
to blame and using an "unhealthy life style" as an opening case really smells like "Editorial Spin". Does that really sound like the S/J caters to the true Constitutionalist (ie... Tea Party) there Monsieur Breton?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.talk to the teawaggers and
talk to the teawaggers and their lap dogs. Until they decide to help America, things will get worse. While America cannot wait, they don't care, as long as they can keep their filthy lucre.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The teawaggers will be
The teawaggers will be available for psychiatric consultation as soon as we can clear the streets of the fleabaggers. The parrot sez he had a German Lucre once, but he kept it pretty clean.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.