A tragedy, fading from memory

Conversation about the photo of fallen Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard fell along two tracks: One, it was a harsh portrait of the reality of war; or, two, it was a needless, callous exploiting of a soldier's final moments, insulting to his family and country.

We didn't print it. The Sun Journal has a policy against publishing images of the severely injured or dead. National debate raged, though, after many national newspapers did, followed by outrage and denouncement from Bernard's family in New Portland and the Department of Defense.

Lost amid talk of "why the photograph" were larger questions of why Bernard was treading through an Afghani pomegranate grove, and why, in general, so many troops remain engaged in a country known as the "Graveyard of Empires."

Today is the eighth anniversary of the answer.

Eight years ago today, the United States experienced the most hellish, tragic experience in its modern history. We were attacked from within, by enemies without regard for our life or society. Our collective American knees buckled when the twin towers fell, live, on national television.

Time has a way of healing, though, and the United States has repaired itself since 9/11, just enough so the memory of the day is starting to fade. Sure, we remember what happened, but the raw emotion and naked feeling of vulnerability and fear is hard to recapture after all these years.

The greatest evidence of this is current debate about Afghanistan, galvanized on Sept. 1 by the columnist George Will's unexpected call for pulling American troops from the country. This was heralded as a turning point in the lengthy conflict, and has allowed others to speak more freely of their concerns about the operation.

Will's logic was sound, but his analyses failed to mention 9/11, even once. This is a remarkable oversight. It indicates either 9/11 is now passé as rationale for the Afghan conflict, or the attacks have indeed faded from national consciousness.

Evaluating the merits of Afghanistan is impossible without considering why we are there. It was the staging ground for America's greatest domestic tragedy, executed with savage precision into the very heart of our culture. Pretending this didn't happen, or failing to acknowledge that it did, is myopic.

Afghanistan is a quagmire, without question. Countless attempts at nation-building across its craggy mountains and windswept plains have been foiled. There are good reasons to be concerned about whether our forces, after so many years of fighting there and elsewhere, can succeed where others have failed.

Yet it must be remembered: There is good reason to fight. Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard was killed defending a country attacked without provocation, with extreme malice. He didn't fall because of a flawed policy, strategic error, or some hopeless cause.

He died for those who died eight years ago today.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

MeinMaine's picture
verified

If the parents of this brave

If the parents of this brave soldier had agreed to have his picture published, this brouhaha would be a mute point. They begged and pleaded for their sons right to privacy, and were denied that simple fact. That is the true crime here.

Proudliberal's picture

The Sun Journal editorial

The Sun Journal editorial board endorsed the stupidest president ever and endorsed a demented old guy who couldn't remember how many houses he owned and we are supposed to take seriously their analysis of Afghan war policy? Please, I'd be surprised if they can even find Afghanistan on a map.

That soldier did not die for those who perished on 9/11 - he died because of the neglect the Bush administration showed towards the mountains of actionable intelligence it received in the months leading up to 9/11. Not only could the attacks been prevented, but they had all the information needed to kneecap and destroy Al Queda, but it was more important for shrub to vacation at his fake ranch and appear to be a tough guy instead of the rambling drunk he was and is.

We will continue to bury soldiers who are dying for nothing. Exactly what are we doing in Iraq? Afghanistan? The place to be fighting is the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan because that is where the Al Queda leadership is holed up. Too bad the Sun Journal can't even figure something this simple out. And you wonder why newspapers are dying by the boatload?

tron's picture

"The Sun Journal has a

"The Sun Journal has a policy against publishing images of the severely injured or dead. " This is a bald face lie, and I demand the SJ print a retraction. The photo that crystalizes it the most, is a woman, shot dead by her son and the SJ hiring a plane so a photograhper could take a full on picture and then splashed it on the front page of the paper.

veritas's picture
verified

A journalist who bows to

A journalist who bows to political and social pressure to dare not publish a likeness of a soldier dieing in battle is not worthy to exercise the awesome responsibilites of that First Amendment Protection of the Freedom of the Press which we who have risked our lives in battle have helped ensure.

-----------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.

dypefecyday's picture

This article is about two

This article is about two things: The memory of 9-11 and the photo of Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard.

The memory of 9-11 is not fading, not by a long shot. 9-11 is everywhere, it's in every American Flag and the remaining 'God Bless America' signs still posted, the 'welcome home' signs for our service men and women returning home after doing a tour. 9-11 is in every photo of a loved one who lost their life on or because of that day or the resulting war on terror. 9-11 is forever synonymous with New York and Pennsylvania for many of us, especially those that go by Ground Zero every day. It's on the news and it's 'entertainment' in the form of documentaries and made-for-tv movies. We couldn't forget if we wanted to. And though we all wish it never happened, we don't want to forget that it did. So to say the memory of it is fading is blatantly inappropriate.

What is fading a little bit is the pain of 9-11. It fades just like pain from any event generally fades over time. Most of us can remember exactly where we were when the planes crashed into the WTC towers and Pentagon and when we got news that one crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. We will always remember, just as our grandparents remember Pearl Harbor, just our parents remember when JFK was shot and just as we, who were only children, remember when the Challenger exploded. The pain and horror of these events are shocking and it does literally bring many of us to our knees. And we wonder why something so terrible has happened. To say memories are fading is so completely untrue. We couldn't if we wanted to. It surrounds us constantly. I think of 9-11 every time I see an American Flag because of the sheer abundance of them when it happened. And today, I wear my American Flag pin to remember and honor those that have lost their lives or loved ones for us, whether by choice or by fate.

Now, about the photo. Whether your opinion is that it is appropriate for the press to release the photo for posterity or to create another round of grief and anger over 9-11 or whatever reason they give, or your opinion is that it is totally inappropriate, the fact of the matter is, we remember all too well.

I learned a neat little philosophy as a child and it remains with me still today: Do unto others as you would have done to you. If it were your child, would you want to see him or her like that? Would you want that moment in time to remain in your mind for the rest of your life? It's one thing to know what happened and come to grips with it, it's completely different to have the image etched in your mind. Just as I associate the American Flag with 9-11 instead of the Pledge of Allegiance like I did up until 9-10-2001, Lance Corporal Bernard's loved ones will have the image of him dying flashing through their minds instead of images of him playing and riding his bike as a boy, blowing out birthday candles or opening his gifts, learning how to drive, getting ready for prom or graduating high school or the many other memories they have. Those memories will still be there, but none of them will be the first thing they see when they think of him. It will be the lasting image that haunts them because he was their son.

Responsible journalism should bear 'Do unto' philosophy in mind when making decisions that will affect a person whose loved one has paid the ultimate price.

Rinoblast's picture

"The Sun Journal has a

"The Sun Journal has a policy against publishing images of the severely injured or dead." Except when you die in a fire or your sun decapitates you with a gun. Way to be hyprocritical.

momof4's picture

I actually agree with you,

I actually agree with you, Tron. Go figure.

tron's picture

Afghanistan is where the

Afghanistan is where the answer to 911 should have waged from the beginning. Americans were generally in support of this action, which made sense. The terrorist trained there, received their orders there, and still do to this day. But some saw fit to go into Iraq instead, and after eight years, Afghanistan is almost as hazardous to us as before.

Advertisement