Law must change, not just charge

Maine's new distracted driving law went into effect on Saturday. It will be interesting to see how it is enforced, as this legislation is intended to address a whole new, scary suite of rampant misbehaviors.

Common sense must reign, for if this law is used to punish behavior that is either benign, necessary or otherwise justifiable, public support for it will disappear. Law enforcement must walk fine lines among punishing the egregious, encouraging the repentant and condoning the innocent.

Take the accident in Lewiston the other day, when a woman driving on Pond Road was trying, for reasons beyond our comprehension, to feed a cat while driving. She crashed, and turned a pretty rugged-looking utility pole into a splintered mess. Clearly, cat-feeding is a driver distraction.

And, predictably, police said this behavior would have sparked a charge under the new law.

Yet we can imagine scenarios in which the distraction isn't so cut-and-dried. Arguably, anything could possibly be a distraction, even normal driving activity such as changing lanes, adjusting the rear-view mirror, or latching a seatbelt. Could someone be charged for doing something for their safety?

We hope not, which is why we encourage common sense in enforcing this law. It's meant to help control popular activities of modern society that shouldn't occur behind the wheel: texting, watching DVDs, playing on global positioning devices, as well as the ludicrous, like feeding a cat.

These are dangers that have and will get people killed on the roads of Maine. It has been the ubiquity of multitasking to include driving that has prompted lawmakers and safety groups to action to combat the blasé response from the public so far. We haven't listened, so now there are laws.

What's worse is that it seems to be getting worse. There are people driving along Maine's highways, to invoke a notorious case, while watching a show on a laptop computer in the passenger seat. It begs questions: When did driving become so easy? Or, rather, when did our attention spans get so short? The best show a driver can watch is the road ahead. It's unpredictable and changing. If only television dramas could boast the same suspense. 

If applied with judiciousness, the new distracted driving law could be effective. If enforced with insensible zeal, however, its real mission could become compromised. Under this law, it's most important to change driver behaviors, than charge the driving lawbreakers.

Then we'll all feel safer. 

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

formerbludevil's picture

http://www.sunjournal.com/nod

http://www.sunjournal.com/node/43886
This is an interesting story...and great comments. I agree with one poster, the stripping away of Americana.

MeinMaine's picture
verified

there are states who have a

there are states who have a cell phone law in place already. That is becoming the case of the "dead horse". As far as buckling your seat belt is concerned, common sense says "do it before you start the car". Some of the items on this list are already just part of the "duh" syndrome. and "farting" being a distraction? Maybe if you are seven years old, I'll give you that one. Be reasonable people. We have the law in place because people don't want to be reasonable. Drive your car while you're driving your car, period. Don't put on makeup, don't read the paper, don't feed the cat/kids/dog/camel. DRIVE THE DAMN CAR.

B's picture

Nancy: the law exempts

Nancy: the law exempts police officers.
Fixit: NEWS FLASH: every law is enforced at the discretion of police officers! Distracted by a streaker??? yes, that is a big problem, well maybe in the '70s... LOL... The distractions are those that occur within the vehicle. Besides in this day and age, no law would pass that prohibits cell phone use, even though most erratic drivers you come across have a phone held up their ear. Use better grammar and learn how to spell and you might be taken seriously someday.

formerbludevil's picture

I don't seem to remember the

I don't seem to remember the proper usage of three periods or question marks, text message lexicon, or fragmented sentences that begin with a lower case letter being taught in any of my English classes. Ease up B, these are blog pages after all :)

Winterbear98's picture

This laws tells you nothing

This laws tells you nothing whats out if you fart when you got gas do not pass

hurricanium's picture

Now for those of us who

Now for those of us who drive around Augusta a lot. I see many State Reps and Senators driving around changing lanes and cutting people off while on cell phones. Who wants to take bets that the police will not pull any of them over?

Nancy's picture

So I guess the police will

So I guess the police will not be using the computers that are attached to the dash of the cruisers any more either huh??

T's picture

Let me guess. You've had

Let me guess. You've had run-ins with the police before. Did you spend any time in jail?

fixit001's picture

A law that is so vague or

A law that is so vague or would be enforced at the discreation of the officer is WRONG period.
It is as if our legislators again would rather hurry and get back to the phones to gather contributions(BRIBES) that to write a real law like use of cell phones pohibited simple right but oh no room for thier lawyer friends to wiggle out of, so we have a law that can charge someone for being distracted by lets say a streaker and hitting another vehicle all i can say to our folks in Agusta is YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS THE WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU ARE STUPID AS SIN I HAVE A CAT CAT THAT IS SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU COMBINED OH YEAH THE CITY COUNCIL YOUR JUST AS BAD!!

Advertisement