Law must change, not just charge

Maine's new distracted driving law went into effect on Saturday. It will be interesting to see how it is enforced, as this legislation is intended to address a whole new, scary suite of rampant misbehaviors.

Common sense must reign, for if this law is used to punish behavior that is either benign, necessary or otherwise justifiable, public support for it will disappear. Law enforcement must walk fine lines among punishing the egregious, encouraging the repentant and condoning the innocent.

Take the accident in Lewiston the other day, when a woman driving on Pond Road was trying, for reasons beyond our comprehension, to feed a cat while driving. She crashed, and turned a pretty rugged-looking utility pole into a splintered mess. Clearly, cat-feeding is a driver distraction.

And, predictably, police said this behavior would have sparked a charge under the new law.

Yet we can imagine scenarios in which the distraction isn't so cut-and-dried. Arguably, anything could possibly be a distraction, even normal driving activity such as changing lanes, adjusting the rear-view mirror, or latching a seatbelt. Could someone be charged for doing something for their safety?

We hope not, which is why we encourage common sense in enforcing this law. It's meant to help control popular activities of modern society that shouldn't occur behind the wheel: texting, watching DVDs, playing on global positioning devices, as well as the ludicrous, like feeding a cat.

These are dangers that have and will get people killed on the roads of Maine. It has been the ubiquity of multitasking to include driving that has prompted lawmakers and safety groups to action to combat the blasé response from the public so far. We haven't listened, so now there are laws.

What's worse is that it seems to be getting worse. There are people driving along Maine's highways, to invoke a notorious case, while watching a show on a laptop computer in the passenger seat. It begs questions: When did driving become so easy? Or, rather, when did our attention spans get so short? The best show a driver can watch is the road ahead. It's unpredictable and changing. If only television dramas could boast the same suspense. 

If applied with judiciousness, the new distracted driving law could be effective. If enforced with insensible zeal, however, its real mission could become compromised. Under this law, it's most important to change driver behaviors, than charge the driving lawbreakers.

Then we'll all feel safer.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

there are states who have a

there are states who have a cell phone law in place already. That is becoming the case of the "dead horse". As far as buckling your seat belt is concerned, common sense says "do it before you start the car". Some of the items on this list are already just part of the "duh" syndrome. and "farting" being a distraction? Maybe if you are seven years old, I'll give you that one. Be reasonable people. We have the law in place because people don't want to be reasonable. Drive your car while you're driving your car, period. Don't put on makeup, don't read the paper, don't feed the cat/kids/dog/camel. DRIVE THE DAMN CAR.


A law that is so vague or

A law that is so vague or would be enforced at the discreation of the officer is WRONG period.
It is as if our legislators again would rather hurry and get back to the phones to gather contributions(BRIBES) that to write a real law like use of cell phones pohibited simple right but oh no room for thier lawyer friends to wiggle out of, so we have a law that can charge someone for being distracted by lets say a streaker and hitting another vehicle all i can say to our folks in Agusta is YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS THE WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU ARE STUPID AS SIN I HAVE A CAT CAT THAT IS SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU COMBINED OH YEAH THE CITY COUNCIL YOUR JUST AS BAD!!


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...