Washington County Sheriff Donnie Smith has taken a firm and ethical stand in announcing that he will end his affiliation with the Maine Sheriffs’ Association if Penobscot County Sheriff Glenn Ross continues as the organization’s president.
The mission of the nonprofit Maine Sheriffs’ Association is to raise “the level of professionalism in the criminal justice field.” Sheriff Smith doesn’t believe Sheriff Ross is committed to that mission, and wants Ross tossed.
It seems Smith has cause to doubt Ross’ professionalism.
In November, hours before his friend the Rev. Robert Carlson leaped to his death from the Penobscot Narrows Bridge, Ross twice spoke with the reverend by phone, telling Carlson that he was under state police investigation.
Ross told the Bangor Daily News that he didn’t provide his friend with details of the sex abuse investigation, but only told Carlson in order to explain why the reverend would no longer have access to the Penobscot County Jail.
He was, Ross said, thinking of the safety of the inmates.
However, an investigation by the Waldo County Sheriff’s Department into Carlson’s death indicated Ross called Carlson to tell him about the investigation because he didn’t want his longtime friend to be “blindsided.”
Showing such distinct favoritism toward a pal under criminal investigation is not in keeping with the professional standards of Maine’s law enforcement officers.
Ross isn’t taking Smith’s criticisms quietly. He told the BDN that Smith “is more interested in creating a ‘media event’ with his allegations than being a champion for law enforcement ethics.”
We disagree.
Ross , in a post on the Sheriffs’ Association website, wrote about the challenges in keeping our communities safe and called on his fellow officers to “work together as crime knows no boundaries.”
From a practical standpoint, it would be hard to imagine Smith and other law enforcement officers trusting in Ross’ ability to work together when, according to Smith, it’s just “not normal” for an officer to inform someone “they are under investigation by other agencies.”
A spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office said it didn’t appear Ross broke any law in informing his friend, a potential criminal defendant, of a police investigation. That may be true, but it certainly violated the professional trust of his fellow officers and Smith is right to call him out.
We have to be able to trust police.
In June, the Maine Heritage Policy Center made a request — under Maine’s Freedom of Access Act — to the Maine State Housing Authority for public records of expenditures over a 13-year period.
The request was for dates, amounts and categories of spending in MaineHousing’s “checkbook,” according to Sam Adolphsen, director of the Center for Open Government at MHPC, or access to “essentially every check they wrote.”
Many months later, the MHPC received a partial list of vendors and vendor addresses. The identity of some of the vendors was redacted, and no information on expenditure dates or amounts by vendor was provided.
The MHPC paid $800, representing 90 hours of MaineHousing efforts, for a vendor list with aggregate amounts by year because, according to MaineHousing’s denial, its computer system doesn’t “keep” records of expenditures by date and vendor amounts.
Huh?
Maine law does not require government to create records in response to FOAA requests, only to provide access to records it already keeps.
Are we to believe that MaineHousing cannot produce its checkbook register for more than a decade? In whole or in part?
Government certainly expects us citizens to do that when it comes to accounting income taxes and other taxes owed, and we have no less of an expectation that government must do the same when it comes to accounting for public spending.
As a nod to the public’s very real right to know, we encourage MaineHousing to revisit MHPC’s original FOAA request and respond to it in full. Quickly. And at no additional charge.
The opinions expressed in this column reflect the views of the ownership and editorial board.

Maine Heritage request for informaton from Maine State Housing
It would seem to be a legtimate request and it was definitely met by a less than legitimate reply. Maybe there are political reasons for the request, but nonetheless, an honest and accurate reply is required. A list of vendors is not a reeport of expenditures; and YES, a non-reply such as this smacks of improper behavior. The citizens of Maine have seen first hand how some of these directors have abused their positions and it is only right to expect the director of the MSHA give an honest reply on this request.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Why the rush to judgment
I wonder why people are making all of these assumptions. If Ms McCormick says most of these were hotel bills for required conferences and it turns out to be true, what's the big deal? If they had a wellness program ,and most companies that provide health insurance for their employees have one, and the activities were part of that, what's the big deal? Maybe people don't understand a wellness program? Where I worked the wellness committee invited someone to come in a give a neck massage to anyone who wanted to pay for one and receive it on their lunch break or after hours. No tax money or time was involved. What's the big deal? It may be that malfeasance was involved, but I'm not seeing anything near proof of it only media smear. And the fact that it cooridinates nicely with an attempt by the current administration to illegally fire the director and the information comes from the Heritage Foundation, the premier experts at media smear, makes it look suspicious to me.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.record keeping
Claire, perhaps all that spending was perfectly innocent or perhaps it was as big a boondoggle as Violette and the whole Maine Turnpike Authority embezzlement thing.
I ran many businesses in my life time. When checks were written not only did they say who they were written to but what the funds were paying for and I kept those records for 5 years in case of an IRS audit. Ms McCormick has not been forthcoming with this information just as Violette tried to cover up his wrong doing. This is what's raising all the red flags.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Ms. McCormick's reluctance to
Ms. McCormick's reluctance to be forthcoming with explanations or proof of no wrongdoings is beginning to give off an odor not inconsistent with that of limburger cheese.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Hey Paul
Want to smell some more limburger cheese? Click on to todays issue of www.themainewire/2012/01/editorial-bad-government/. Man, is this beginning to stink!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Justified paranoia
Considering the governor and Mr. Poliquin have been out for her head since the day he took office, I'd say a certain level of paranoia is more than justified. In her shoes I wouldn't be talking to anybody without a battery of lawyers whether I was guilty of anything or not. Eventually all of this will be sorted out but in the meantime I think people should just chill.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Disagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Do my eyes deceive me or are
Do my eyes deceive me or are you asking the court of public opinion to remain silent?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Innocence
I have no problem with legitimate authorities or even the press looking into this. And if malfeasance is found, then the proper consequences should ensue. I do object to all this drooling over a potential scandal and media smear which in my opinion is not only premature but kind of suspicious given the issues surrounding it. I guess I'm just an old fashioned girl longing for the days when people were presumed innocent until proven guilty and when guilt by association was considered to be unfair.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Welcome to America in the
Welcome to America in the 21st century.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.no, welcome to republican
no, welcome to republican politics, where it doesn't matter who goes on. but what you can infer goes on. It is entirely a republican phenomenon, where decency doesn't exist.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Claire, that's what the MHPC
Claire, that's what the MHPC does, takes half truths and spins it to their advantage. It's bad enough, but when so call journalists like the SJ and Channel 13 run with it without ever checking up on the total facts, it gets spun around to make whoever they want look bad, and they jazz up their base and makes them believe in the bogeyman. There followers are sheep, believing everything they say, but it wouldn't matter if we had an independent journalists willing to work to find the truth, instead of reporting on new releases.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.MHPC
Let's see your donor list, complete with donor names, dates, and amounts for the last ten years. Any from out of state interests?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'll bet the list wouldn't
I'll bet the list wouldn't contain very many entries referencing Disney World or Okinawan Karate.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.how could you possibly know?
how could you possibly know?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'm a pirate who owns a
I'm a pirate who owns a talking parrot, remember?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.no, you're a mentally
no, you're a mentally deficient person who talks to and answers to an imaginary bird. We will pray you receive the help you need.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Knock it off, Dan.
Knock it off, Dan.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.When did you start to refer
When did you start to refer to yourself as we? And I'm mentally deficient? Hahaha...Seems to me you're the one who seems to continually attempt to engage in the battle of wits unarmed.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.More information
Please check out www.themainewire.com for a partial list of the vendors that the MSHA threw money at. IT'S OBSCENE!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Is it any wonder the SJ is
Is it any wonder the SJ is joining the MHPC in its witch hunt? No editorial on the dead-beat Speaker, no editorial on the State Treasurer serving in violation of the Maine Constitution, but continuing the witch hunt in the MSHA.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (5)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.That might be because they're
That might be because they're focusing on the areas in which wrongdoings have taken place.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.There is no 'wrongdoing' in
There is no 'wrongdoing' in the MSHA. You may think the expenditures are inappropiate, and I might agree, but there is no 'wrongdoing'. HOWEVER what the Speaker and State Treasurer are doing is ILLEGAL, yet you and your clan seem OK with that.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.My clan have left the island;
My clan have left the island; it's just me and the parrot, now.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.figures, your clan has never
figures, your clan has never been willing to be accountable
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Ps: Does Tron have proof of
Ps: Does Tron have proof of no wrongdoing?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.prove a negative, typical of
prove a negative, typical of you and yours wanting to prove a negative. PROVE that something illegal happen, then we'll talk.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.No we won't...I have better
No we won't...I have better things to do than try to convince you of anything. Remember, I'm not here to convert you, but to laugh at you.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.