The group attempting to advance a citizen initiative that would increase energy efficiency and a requirement that electricity providers derive a certain amount of power from renewable sources announced Monday that it's waiting until 2013 to bring the issue to voters.
The announcement by Maine Citizens for Clean Energy came several hours after the group canceled a news conference that was supposed to accompany its presentation of signatures to the Secretary of State's Office to put a citizens initiative on the November ballot.
David Farmer, a spokesman for the group, said the coalition realized over the weekend that its effort to gather 57,277 signatures fell short.
The group began collecting signatures in November. Farmer said that it collected more than 28,000 signatures on Election Day and that polling showed most Mainers supported increasing Maine's renewable energy economy.
Farmer indicated there was no political calculation in delaying the initiative until 2013. He said the proposal would have fared well in a presidential election year.
The initiative, if approved, would increase the amount of Maine’s electricity coming from renewable energy sources by 20 percent and require utilities to invest in energy efficiency whenever the investment would reduce energy costs for ratepayers. The renewable energy mandate would work inside the state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard.
Maine’s RPS is set to reach 40 percent by 2017. The referendum would increase that mandate to 50 percent by 2020, while also requiring providers to invest in energy efficiency.
Maine’s current RPS is 34 percent.
The citizens initiative is supported by a coalition of environmental and conservation groups. It is opposed by a group critical of the proliferation of grid-scale wind energy development and by Gov. Paul LePage, who has used public appearances to blast the proposal.
Over the weekend, Chris O’Neil, the spokesman for the anti-wind group Save Maine’s Mountains, formed a political action committee opposing the initiative. The PAC is called Stop Taking our Paychecks.
O'Neil, in a written statement, said Monday that it was unclear why the group pulled back from the campaign, but that his would be ready to fight the initiative whether it appeared on the ballot this year or next.
"It could be that they read the writing on the wall and figured out that the mandate was dead on arrival," O'Neil said. "Or it could be that despite having lots of special interest money, political operatives and paid signature gatherers, the increasingly aware Maine voters just said no when asked to sign."


A little more honesty would be nice
Should the wind industry and other special interests groups decide to continue the pursuit of the initiative, I invite them to be more honest and forthright with the facts. This initiative, up to this point, had been characterized by a remarkably brazen avoidance of facts.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Honestly now!
Where does it state in the wind business that honesty is part of their business plan?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.time
Now Governor and anti-WIND activists can use our energies educating the people of Maine. The truth will be revealed.
WINDFALL the movie will be played Sunday, March 4 , 2012 at Dixfield High School 1 pm- 5 pm good food too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87TGW9eLAtU
WINDFALL - theatrical trailer
www.youtube.com
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (6)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.How Embarrassing for the subsidy seekers.
Now even Dave Farmer(D) knows that the support for corporate wind farming has dropped so much they can't get the signatures or their referendum would go down to defeat.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (7)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The Paid signature mercanaries of the Wind Self- Servers LOSE!
Yes, they were paid to collect signatures, as I was told by one of them a few weeks ago.
They could have done a better job. Perhaps they were waiting for more subsidy money to support their next try!
You know how mercenaries work.
The average Mainer would collect signatures for free to LOWER THEIR RATES!
This initiative failed because Mainers want lower rates, not higher ones.
The average Mainer also knows this initiative was supported by Wind Shills from away and self-serving companies like REED & REED.
It should have been called, "Take my money, for MORE EXPENSIVE intermittent sometimes wind electricity."
Most just laughed and turned away, as I did.
Mainers are learning every day now how this renewable thing works.
And as more time passes, a more educated populace will pinch their noses more tightly.
Renewables on Grid Scale are a Subsidy farce, uneconomical and very costly to us all!they expect us to pay for them .
They do little to solve any of our energy concerns.
Solyndra any one? Beacon Power? First Wind?
He knows, We want lower rates, Not higher ones from SCAMS!
LePage and Fletcher know this well.
Well, does that make sense?
You Bet!
Bring on the Hydro and Gas Governah!
A new PAC has formed to demand lower rates for all of us .
Now , I wonder if they can get those signatures --to Lower Rates, from dense energy sources,
I for one, would collect those signature, FOR FREE!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (8)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Mandates are wrong
Well, this is very interesting. Despite having plenty of resources, money, zealots, and hired hands, these people might not have enough signatures that are verifiable.
Could it be that Maine people are beginning to see that wind power is no panacea? That mandates are burdensome, intrusive, and anti-democratic? That this particular mandate is both unnecessary and costly?
Are we getting to the point that Mainers want the real truth about the manipulation that has been happening, with ratepayers the victims, ever since Angus King (now wind developer) led the way to de-regulation? The promise that we would have lower electricity costs with de-regulation has been broken for a long time.
Let the free market create our choices and not the dictates of zealots who want to force their expensive and environmentally costly utopian ideal of unpredictable, unreliable, ineffective wind power on the rest of us.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (7)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.