Lewiston School Committee opposes LePage's school choice bills

LEWISTON — The School Committee is opposing two of Gov. Paul LePage's controversial education proposals, school choice and allowing taxpayer money to pay for tuition at religious schools.

Public hearings on those bills are being held this week in Augusta.

LePage wants to allow public schools to offer slots to out-of-district students without receiving superintendent approval. That could mean a family in one town could send their child to a school in another and state taxpayer money would follow the student. Parents could also send their children to religious schools at taxpayer expense.

“We want to allow families to have a say in what the best educational fit is for their children,” Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen said in a statement last month.

The School Committee voted 6-2 Monday night to oppose LD 2774, An Act to Remove Inequity in Student Access to Certain Schools. It eliminates the prohibition of taxpayer money to pay tuition to religious schools.

Lewiston also voted 6-2 to oppose LD 2275, “An Act to Expand Educational Opportunities for Maine Students.” That bill would grant school choices throughout Maine, allowing parents to send their children to a school of their choice. Critics say, if passed, that proposal would especially harm rural schools.

Two members who supported both bills were City Councilor Don D'Auteuil, the council's representative on the School Committee, and Sonia Taylor. They said if people want to send their children to Muslim or Christian schools they should be able to do that, Lewiston Superintendent Bill Webster said.

The majority of the board argued that the U.S. Constitution guarantees separation of church and state, and if parents want their child to go to a religious school, “then they should pay for it,” Webster said.

Member Jim Handy, who opposed both bills, said the “free range, wide open school choices the governor has proposed” would not only harm public schools, they would create higher taxes in Lewiston.

Parents like schools where the buildings are new, and would try to send their child to those schools, including some not in Lewiston. The state dollars for the individual students would leave Lewiston, while taxpayers would still be obligated to educate students left behind. “What would happen there would be one or two public schools left. It would create an education wasteland,” Handy said. Private schools would not “have the public interest at mind while spending taxpayer money,” Handy said.

Committee members also voted unanimously to support LD 1865, An Act to Enhance Career and Technical Education. That would mean high schools that share the same regional technical center would have to better coordinate school calendars. The bill would also expand opportunities for high school students to earn college credits.

Lewiston members took no action on a fourth bill, LD 2773, An Act to Ensure Effective Teaching and School Leadership. That proposal would require school districts to standardize teacher evaluations systems.

That would allow ineffective teachers who did not meet criteria and improve over a two-year period to be placed on probation and eventually fired. Lewiston is already building a standardized teacher evaluation system, but there are unanswered questions surrounding local control and the authority of superintendents versus school boards, Webster said.

Lewiston's votes have been forwarded to the legislative Education Committee, which will recommend whether the bills be passed or rejected to the House and Senate.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Carl Kimball's picture

YUP

Ya, you missed it, because i didn't say it. But that's okay, your only human and we all can misread something.

Carl Kimball's picture

DON'T SEE THE PROBLEM

You want your kids to have an education, well it's there being paid by the taxpayers, (with or without kids). You want a different school, there are alot of houses that are for sale in many towns, (thanks to the system). You want to send your child to folklore school, then do so, but don't expect the taxpayer to foot the bill. And if your doing this just so your child won't be around what you think is lesser type kids. Here's a news flash, they will all become adults and will have to deal with each other then. Next you will want the taxpayer to pay for college, too.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

I see, people paying $40 and

I see, people paying $40 and $60 grand a year to send their kids to college are not taxpayers, eh? I must've missed that part.

GARY SAVARD's picture

I'm in favor of free choice.

I'm in favor of free choice. It appears that the money sucking machine that is the Lewiston School Department is worried that without a monopoly on students, it will suffer. That's life. If Lewiston is spending X amount of money to educate a student, which is paid by local and state taxes, then that amount should be able to follow that student to any accredited school of choice. Of course, teachers' unions and anyone feeding off of the current system will fight this to the bitter end.

Carl Kimball's picture

NO

If they want to send their child to a folklore school, then they can pay for it. If they want to send their child to another school outside their town, they can pay for that, too.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

They ARE paying for it, plus

They ARE paying for it, plus they're paying property taxes to support the government school system as well. Therein lies the problem.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...