Former teacher pleads to sex charge

PARIS — A former Oxford Hills School District teacher and coach pleaded no contest Tuesday to charges of  sexual contact with a female student.

Shawn Gordon, 34, of Webber Farm Road in Paris entered the plea to unlawful sexual contact and assault in Oxford County Superior Court. Gordon's sentence was deferred for one year, during which time he must not have any contact with the girl or her family and must refrain from criminal activity. Upon successful completion, Gordon may be discharged.

The Paris Police Department in February 2008 charged
Gordon with sexual contact with a female student in July 2007.

According to Assistant Superintendent Richard Colpitts of the Oxford Hills School District, Gordon was hired in October 2001 as an eighth-grade social studies teacher. In June 2007, he was appointed to teach social studies at Oxford Hills Comprehensive High School. He resigned effective Sept. 30, 2007.

Gordon worked as the assistant head coach for the high school football team and had been appointed as a middle school social studies liaison in 2006, a stipend position, by the board.

In addressing Justice Andrew Horton, the girl's parents said she had been socially ostracized by students and parents, but that the family's supporters outnumber their detractors.

"Part of her teen years were robbed, and she'll never get them back," the girl's father said.

She was 16 years old when the contact occurred, her parents said.

"[She] did absolutely nothing wrong," said the girl's mother. "She is the victim, not Mr. Gordon."

Defense lawyer Leonard Sharon said Gordon accepted responsibility for his actions and never blamed the girl for his leaving the school district. Sharon said Gordon voluntarily resigned when confronted by the school board about the accusation.

Gordon's certificate to teach in Maine was issued April 16, 1998, according to David Connerty-Marin, spokesman for the Department of Education.

"His last certificate, issued July 1, 2004, allowing him to teach social studies in grades seven through 12, would normally be a five-year certificate," Connerty-Marin said. But Sept. 29, 2007, was the last date Gordon held a valid certificate to teach. Privacy laws prevent the Department of Education from releasing the reason Gordon no longer holds a teaching certificate.

Gordon, a 1992 graduate of Leavitt Area High School in Turner, graduated from the University of Maine in 1997.
A former defensive coordinator for the now-defunct semipro Shockers football
team in Lewiston, Gordon previously taught at Hall-Dale Middle School in
Farmingdale and in the Gray-New
Gloucester school district.

mlangeveld@sunjournal.com

Staff editor Judy Meyer contributed to this report.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

snysyl's picture

Just read this article in

Just read this article in the Sun Journal, here's the headline: Convicted Auburn teacher faces federal sex charges, and here's the link: http://www.sunjournal.com/node/284680

The headline sounds an awful lot like the one at the top of this page, but the details are a bit different... if you're looking for a predator to crucify, he's your man.

joe gray's picture
verified

Wow, I have been following

Wow, I have been following this because I know Shawn. I know that he is a good educator and a good coach. He has given his heart and soul to the only career that he has cared about. So far I have seen people stand up for him and people jump on him while he is down. I have see so pretty petty shots at him from Tommyboy, who I guess was the father of the the student. And then all of a sudden someone, named monkee or chip, either which sounds pretty pathetic, has absolutly nothing to say but negative things. I think the fact that this article didn't state any facts and is very slanted towards one side, says a lot. What is the other side of the story?

moss81's picture

I can hardly believe what I

I can hardly believe what I just read. You just lost all credibility as far as I'm concerned, by your insensitive exposure of the student ("victim" is more accurate). What are you thinking??? You've committed a far worse offense than any of the posters you criticize.

Greg Harris's picture

Nice. You trying to out the

Nice. You trying to out the girl whose identity has been protected by law up to this point?

Innocent people fight and don't plead out.

joe gray's picture
verified

Honestly, it doesn't take a

Honestly, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to put things together if you either live in the area or are from the area. Click on his username.

Greg Harris's picture

Rocket scientist? Most do

Rocket scientist?

Most do not know who Gordons victim was. Therefore we wouldn't know who her parents are. Apparently you are not an advocate of victims of sexual crimes rights to remain unknown to the public.

Unlike you who post to the world hiding behind a made up name, to protect your identity.

harley2010's picture

I am sure the state of Maine

I am sure the state of Maine singled out this man to make his life miserable. Get real where there is smoke there is fire...Mr. Gordon is a joke. I also hear that he was accosted in his work parking lot by someone who wants him to stay away from his wife. to clarify no contest just google it...It is not an admission of guilt nor is it an admission of innocence. It is what one pleads so he wants to avoid trial. After all the time spent educating himself, landing a position you dreamed about, why would you not stand up for yourself and defend yourself if you are innocent. This is why Mr. Gordon gave up his certificate, the school department had the goods...But by law we will never know what they were, If I were the victim I would look into suing him civally and let it all out so she can finally be free, and let everyone know that he is not a victim, she was. The comments also made by Moxigal is his wife...very sad

moss81's picture

You know, I found it odd

You know, I found it odd that people were quick to identify Tommyboy, but no one bothered to identify Gordon's wife. (You know, the one trying to get us to "accept that a 17 year old girl could activley seek a relationship an adult" - her words exactly-? ) Boy, she's been duped.

snysyl's picture

I don't know the details,

I don't know the details, and neither does anyone else in this forum (with one notable exception), so everything that is being said here is based on hearsay. Tommy boy (Charles Martin) is a teacher who can't bother to proofread what he writes while spitting venom at people he doesn't know - he's the type of closed-minded imbecile that I DEFINITELY wouldn't want to influence my children, so I think his opinion is moot -

Dr. Dosh also doesn't know what he's talking about. A no-contest plea and a guilty plea are VERY different. A guilty plea is just that - an admission of guilt, and can only be entered when there is OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that the party in question is guilty of the act he is accused of, essentially saying that, had this gone to trial, the state would have had sufficient evidence to prove their case. A no-contest plea is also exactly that - it is stating that the defendant does not wish to contest the charge, effectively stating that the defendant does not admit to the charges, but also doesn't wish to contend them at trial.

If someone is innocent, why would he plead no-contest? Simple: Though hearsay isn't admissible in court, the community had already made up its mind as to his guilt, so nothing could be gained by going to trial - even if he had, and was acquitted, he would never be truly vindicated in the eyes the community. Has anyone forgotten about Clarence Thomas? Michael Jackson was vindicated - what does everybody think of him? Shawn simply did not want to put himself and his family through that ordeal. Once you're branded, that's it - there's nothing you can do to change people's minds.

I agree that Shawn's children are going to have a hard time, but not because of their father. He is a good man who loves his kids more than anything. The reason his kids are going to have a hard time is because some ill-informed people in the community are spreading gossip and trying to brand Shawn as some sort of monster who went into teaching so he could molest little kids.

In short, if you don't know the facts and are posting here based on what someone told you, or worse, what you've read in the paper, stop wasting your time and everyone else's. Go read a book. Chuck - find one with pictures - just make sure you keep it right-side-up, though - wouldn't want anyone to think you're stupid...could really ruin your reputation around town.

moss81's picture

First you claim that only

First you claim that only one person on this forum knows the details. Then you say "...if you don't know the facts and are posting here based on what someone told you, or worse, what you've read in the paper, stop wasting your time and everyone else's." So...are we to expect that "one notable exception" will provide us with any details to help us gain an accurate understanding of the "unlawful sexual contact and assault"? I highly doubt it.

The sexual abuse and exploitation of children is a highly emotional issue. Nearly every week we are reminded in our local paper that it's an increasing problem in our own community. It's unrealistic to think that people aren't going to become emotional about someone in our local school violating the trust of children, families and community members (or even being accused as such).

You obviously know Shawn, and are therefore biased in your opinions. By the combination of your obvious slander (and exposure of) Tommy boy and your favoritism toward Shawn (oh, and the unidentified "one notable exception"....though it doesn't take a teaching degree to figure that one out), your post is just as much of an emotional response as the others. I also know Shawn, but undoubtedly in a different capacity than you, and I do not share your positive opinions of him. That alone, however, does not make him guilty in my eyes.

I have a friend who was falsely accused of molesting his stepdaughter. I wouldn't wish that agony on anyone. I also know people make mistakes, even "Good People". But our first priority should always be to protect the children of our community and to maintain accountability within our school district. Please don't expect concerned parents and other citizens in our community to exonerate Shawn Gordon just because you and a couple of other people think he's such a great guy.

Greg Harris's picture

I agree that "Good People"

I agree that "Good People" make mistakes. Engaging in sexual activity and assault on a teenage girl by an adult teacher is not a mistake. Teachers get ample training informing them of their responsibility they are entrusted with. They also know where the line is drawn on sexual activity with their students. Sexual offenses against children does not happen by accident or mistake. Adults have the knowledge, experience and sense to understand that sexual activity with children is very very wrong and have the ability to stop it and prevent it from happening.

Now that i think about it... Is this girl his only victim? Or is this the only one he got caught with?

moss81's picture

Greg, I hear what you are

Greg, I hear what you are saying, and I agree 100%. Perhaps wording it the way I did made light of it, which was not my intention. Teachers have a grave responsibility not only to their students, but also the parents, the community, and the school district. This is a serious issue that has undeniably been hidden from the community (yes, the buzz has been going on since it happened...how can one expect anything less?). What I can't comprehend is how people can realistically expect concerned citizens NOT to gossip ( i.e. talk about it) when one of our students has been violated and NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE ABOUT IT. What are we supposed to do, say "Oh, I hear Shawn Gordon's a great teacher....surely HE wouldn't do anything like that"...and offhandedly dismiss it? Responsible parents SHOULD be upset about this, and I don't care if Mr. Gordon was teacher of the year.....if a student accuses a teacher of abuse, everyone needs to step up to the plate and make that child the first priority. To hell with nice-guy loyalties. How many times have we read comments from friends and neighbors of criminals that go like this, "I just can't believe it! He was such a nice guy, and so polite!"

There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for ANY sexual contact between student and teacher. I don't care what the student did.....Shawn Gordon is the adult in this situation and 100% responsible for anything and everything that happened. Will we ever get the truth? I'd like to think so, but my faith is wavering. The SunJournal article was pathetic and a prime example of poor reporting.......the flimsy paragraph describing the deferral of his sentence (what sentence?) and his "discharge" (????) if he keeps his nose (or should I say, hands) clean for a year.......are they SERIOUS??? The article told us NOTHING.

As a community,we deserve to know what is going on in our schools. If an assault happened on school grounds, we deserve the right to know what happened and what is being done about it. It's no consolation to me that Mr. Gordon immediately resigned voluntarily (hmmmm.....doesn't sound like an innocent man's actions to me...) and lost his teaching license, probably in a cooperative effort to sweep everything under the rug. Privacy laws prohibit the state from exposing why he no longer has a license....more dirt swept under the rug. Sorry to Mr. Gordon's defenders, but when he decided to be a teacher, he put himself in a position of accountability. Sorry to his family, but they're really not my first concern (the words collateral damage come to mind here). If he's as innocent as some seem to think, let him come out and prove it. What does he have to hide? Doesn't want to drag his family through it? Please, don't insult me. Why wouldn't an innocent man fight, with his family by his side, for his dignity?

As I've said before, our first and foremost priority has to be each and every child in our community. And we need to have the assurance that if someone violates just one of them, they will be punished to the fullest extent. Unpleasant? You betcha. Should've thought of that a long time ago, Shawn.

snysyl's picture

As I said before, I don't

As I said before, I don't know the details, but let me suggest a possible scenario:

A girl attempts to seduce a teacher for whatever reason - he rebuffs her and foolishly does not immediately report it to the proper school authorities - weeks later, this same girl, perhaps seeking the attention from the masses that she did not get from the teacher, begins to tell her friends that she "hooked up" with the teacher. The friends tell their parents, the parents contact the girl's parents, and the whole thing snowballs from there -

Is the teacher innocent in this case? No - he had inappropriate contact with a student and didn't report it immediately. But is he guilty of assault? In the eyes of the law, yes, because any inappropriate contact between a teacher and student is automatically classified as such - did he, in actuality, assault this girl? Absolutely not.

At this point, what is he really guilty of? Very bad judgement, for sure, but to paint him as some sort of a predator is ridiculous. Why is it so difficult for everyone to believe that this girl couldn't possibly have attempted to seduce Shawn? Many High School girls are sexually active, and some are promiscuous - it is not out of the realm of possibility that this is the case here -

snysyl's picture

Cliff - you make some great

Cliff - you make some great points, and you're right - I wouldn't expect anyone to exonerate him because I think he's such a great guy - I just ask that people consider the possibility that he's not a predator who spends his free time leering at young girls and planning ways to get them alone so he can assault them.

There are three sides to every story, and it wasn't my intent to convince anyone of anything, but only to suggest that those individuals who don't know the details refrain from spreading rumors and gossip - if not for Shawn's sake, then for the sake of his wife and children - I'm sure this is difficult enough for them to deal with in their own house, but to have to go to school...I can't even imagine how hard this is on them.

moss81's picture

While I don't classify every

While I don't classify every sex offender as a predator, an assault on just one child still demands appropriate consequences/punishment.

I am truly sorry for his family's suffering (they're victims of another sort), and I would like to think others in the community are equally sensitive. However, we musn't let that distract us from the importance of keeping to the issue at hand.

browndog's picture

I am VERY disappointed in

I am VERY disappointed in the ridiculous, uneducated words being thrown around. Shawn Gordon is a fantastic educator with a kind heart and a true excitement for teaching. We should all be so lucky to have a teacher providing such a solid education to our children.

To even imply that Shawn's kids will be affected is disgusting. Your words are both unsettling and ridiculous. Your children had better learn, right now, to treat people as they expect to be treated and not let accusations or rumors influence that.

The article did not describe "actions" by either party so the assumptions that you are making are more damaging than the alleged actions themselves!

Please do not contribute to the rumors and innuendos as you clearly do not have the all of the facts!

Greg Harris's picture

Is Kdot a name or

Is Kdot a name or alias?

Your statements hold very little credibility if you will not even identify yourself in your profile.

Maybe you can open a school that caters to people who want their teenage daughters taught by a convicted sex offender. There seems to be several on here who would be interested. Could be a new nitch market in this down economy!!

His plea may be no contest. But the judge finds him guilty.

maksymax's picture

lucky none of the victims

lucky none of the victims family or friends got a hold of him or it would have been more than a slap on the wrist

maksymax's picture

AHh nice try....with the

AHh nice try....with the name, but wrong again. Too bad you are not aware of his actions in the lockerroom at school befreo the kids got there. I bet you would not have wanted your chilkd to walk in on that. Step up to the plate and Identify yourself Hunt

Greg Harris's picture

He may be a good teacher as

He may be a good teacher as far as teachers go. But he should never be allowed to teach children under the age of 18 ever again. He violated the trust of the 16 year old girl and robbed her of a normal teenage life. He violated the trust of the girls parents. He violated the trust of his fellow teachers in our community and beyond. He violated the trust of our community. He violated the trust of every parent that ever had a student in his class and now we all must worry about what may not have been reported because a young teenage girl had an innocent school girl crush on a teacher who abused our trust.

He is very lucky that he did not end up in prison. He is very lucky that his beautiful wife has chosen to stay with him. He will be very lucky if his own children are not forever scorned in this community because their father is a monster who sexually abuses children placed in his trust.

Moxiegal, the teenage girl is Mr Gordon's victim!! He is the adult who was entrusted with the well-being of that child. He can and should not in any way claim to be her victim. Neither can you.

It is not uncommon for a teenage girl to have a crush on their male teachers. It is not uncommon for those girls to attempt to further that relationship into a physical / sexual one. Those are fairly common and argueably normal feelings and actions of a teenage girl. It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the ADULT teacher to not allow that relationship to become or go any further than a normal student to teacher relationship. It is also the responsibility of the teacher to teach the teenage student that this is wrong (for several different reasons) and put an end to any innappropriate conduct on either persons part.

It is a sad day when people come on here trying to defend the rightousness of an admitted and convicted sexual predator of children put into his control.

Looks like Paris should have a sex offender ordinance to protect its children from monsters like this.

UsamTessy's picture

regardless of the fact that

regardless of the fact that she was 17 (stated as 16 in the article, but for arguments sake we'll say 17), he is not only an adult, but an adult that was in a mentor role for that teenager. 17 is a battlefield of emotions and hormones, and a teacher should not be someone to act on those impulses. it is irrelevant that she was actively seeking a relationship, emotional or physical, because he should have actively been shooting her down.

UsamTessy's picture

regardless of the fact that

regardless of the fact that she was 17 (stated as 16 in the article, but for arguments sake we'll say 17), he is not only an adult, but an adult that was in a mentor role for that teenager. 17 is a battlefield of emotions and hormones, and a teacher should not be someone to act on those impulses. it is irrelevant that she was actively seeking a relationship, emotional or physical, because he should have actively been shooting her down.

Donzie's picture

Chuck, or Tommyboy if that

Chuck, or Tommyboy if that is what you want to be called. His wife is very proud of him. Has been since day one! I have children and am VERY upset that a man like Shawn Gordon will not ever teach them. You're walking on thin ice with those slanderous words you're posting. You yourself said yesterday that you thought that Mr. Gordon would have offered alot to students. Check your script. Some would label you the same way that you have labeled him. I venture to guess that even more people would label you as such!

maksymax's picture

The MAN commited an act

The MAN commited an act against a TEENAGER on school property. Lets see......itappears to be no brainer as to whom is to blame. Are you one of Mr G's little pre-teen
projects Moxiegirl? He enjoys grooming girls and buffing up to impress the little ones. His wife must be soo proud of him. Some day when you have children, you can take them up to hang with your hero and see what happens to them. The guy is, was and always will be an arrogant ass. He will answer to a higher calling someday. No plase to hide then

Donzie's picture

Tron, I guess that you are

Tron, I guess that you are one of those people who probably pass all of those scare e-mails along to your family and friends without checking the truth of them. Hasn't anybody ever told you that you can't believe everything that you read? There are a number of inaccuracies in this article.
The word "actions" encompases alot of things.
mikec, I agree with your last sentence. If an 8 year old boy can kill his family why can't society accept that a 17 year old girl could activley seek a relationship an adult?

moss81's picture

"If an 8 year old boy can

"If an 8 year old boy can kill his family why can't society accept that a 17 year old girl could activley seek a relationship an adult?" Are you serious? Of course society can accept that a 17 year old girl could actively seek a relationship with an adult. What we're having a hard time accepting is that a 30-something married father of two, who has been entrusted with an entire community's children, cannot maintain professional and ethical boundaries with the very population he supposedly cares so much about. You are sadly mistaken if you compare this situation to an 8 year old boy shooting his family. There's a big difference between being taken down by a bullet and a cute teenage girl.

tron's picture

"Gordon accepted

"Gordon accepted responsibility for his actions and never blamed the girl " is an exact copy of the article. He admitted he did it. Perhaps YOU should learn to read.

Donzie's picture

Get away with what? Did you

Get away with what? Did you hear or read any evidence of anything happening? No, just accusations.

tron's picture

A slap on the wrist. That

A slap on the wrist. That 's why this keeps happening, guys know they'll get away with it.

Advertisement