Sumner wind meeting draws crowd to Fire House

Tom Standard photo

Woodstock resident Leola Ballweber, who lives 1.2 miles from the Woodstock wind farm turbines, urged Sumner voters Wednesday night to pass a wind ordinance to protect the town. She said Woodstock didn’t have one when the farm was developed on Spruce Mountain.

SUMNER — Approximately 60 residents and visitors packed the Fire House on Wednesday night to discuss the proposed industrial wind power ordinance.

The town will vote on it at 7 p.m. Wednesday, May 16, in the Fire House.

Members of the Industrial Wind Ordinance Committee and town officials answered questions about the proposed ordinance.

Several people expressed concern about a letter sent to many residents urging them to vote against the ordinance. The letters came from at least four out-of-state locations, had handwritten addresses but no return addresses. While they referenced the website of Clear Sky Energy LLC, it was not clear who actually wrote the letters.

Resident Ed Hinshaw said he believed the letter was a hoax because it was so unprofessionally done and was full of misleading information and errors.

There was much interest in the comments of Woodstock resident Leola Ballweber. Even though her mobile home is 1.2 miles from the wind farm, she said she experiences annoying noise levels. She urged Sumner residents to pass the ordinance. Woodstock did not have a wind power ordinance when a developer moved in.

Because her town operates under state rules, she must hire her own experts and lawyers to enforce noise regulations. She endorsed the proposed Sumner ordinance that requires the town code enforcement officer to investigate complaints and enforce the regulations. Under the Sumner ordinance, the town will have access to developers' sound-monitoring records and can hire needed experts at the developers' expense.

Much discussion was centered on what would happen if the proposed ordinance was defeated.

Resident Pam Cheeseman said that with the ordinance, the developer would have to furnish the town with a performance bond that would guarantee that the towers would be dismantled and the site restored when the turbines were no longer operational. Without the ordinance, the towers could be abandoned if the developer went bankrupt after government subsidies and tax breaks expired.

Wind power developers have presented various figures on what the economic benefit would be to the town.

Committee member Larry O'Rourke indicated these benefits were overstated, based on information from the Maine Revenue Services.

Committee member Jeff Pfeiffer presented evidence that residents could see loss of property value from 5 to 34 percent. If property valuations had to be adjusted for this loss, tax rates might have to go up, he said.

Roxbury resident Cathy Mattson compared going up against wind developers without an ordinance to trying to regulate junkyards without an ordinance. You can't do it, she said. An ordinance will require the companies to do what is right.

Mattson also spoke on how varying conditions and times affected noise. She said that at her home she can hear the wind turbines 2 miles away or even the Rumford mill 5 miles away, if conditions are right.

Selectmen Mary Ann Haxton and Danny Perron spoke in favor of the ordinance. Selectmen Wally Litchfield said the committee had spent hours on the ordinance and it was now up to the voters. He did not express personal support or opposition.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

Oxford Hills Region Towns

All Oxford Hills region towns need to get serious, very quickly about maintaining local control over destructive wind power development. Patriot Rebewables has no concern for the environment, no soul for nature, and are willing to wantonly destroy the health of your neighbors. They will blast away, level, and scalp any mountain ridgelines they can get control over in order to reap tax subsidies and sell Enron-inspired RECs.

The state won't protect your community, only the communities themselves can say that no neighbors are expendable to do the bidding of the wind company, that the quality of place found in each unique yet interconnected town is worth preserving. Petition your local government to place a moratorium on wind power development, step back and allow all residents to understand the multitude of issues concerning wind power, then write a strong ordinance that has the best interests of the community in mind. There are model ordinances and much more information, from the citizens of Maine here: www.windtaskforce.org

 's picture

Noise predictions

sound modeling maps are proving to be wrong. Ask Concord Pond, Roxbury Pond,Vinal Haven, Mars Hill, Beaver Ridge, Tug Hill, Ontario, Australia.

State of Maine calls 42 decibals the normal noise. No . Rural residents hear about 20 dBA. 42 dBA is more than twice as loud. vote for your ordinance, keep your peace and property values. thank you amb

 's picture

Even more than Alice states

The increase in noise levels to 42 dBA as measured on the A weighted decibel scale is far more than double the usual rural Maine background noise level of around 20 dBA. Whether one uses the Loudness Multiplier Theory (Stevens) that says an increase of 10 dBA is a doubling of noise, or the more recently developed Amplitude Multiplier Theory (Warren) that says an increase of 6 dBA is a doubling of noise, the fact is, allowing 42 dBA is a huge increase in allowable noise.

The people were here first. How can any community say that certain residents must have their health and well-being sacrificed to allow wind turbines to be built close to them? That Ms. Ballweber says she can hear the Spruce Mt. turbines at an annoying, sleep disruping level is not surprising at all. Very unfortunate, but not surprising.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...