State budget skips the cost of tax breaks

"This Legislature will not repeat the mistakes of the past by using a one-time windfall to put a Band-Aid over our broken system in the hopes that the problem will go away," House Speaker Robert Nutting, R-Oakland, told reporters last week.

Whew. That's a relief.

Until you consider what the Republicans will do instead: Grant some equally irresponsible tax breaks that will go into effect in 2014 without any mention of how they will be funded.

What's more, the "balanced" budget relies upon three Medicaid benefit cuts the federal government has already indicated are not permitted under existing rules. It is entirely possible, even likely, the feds will not grant these anticipated waivers.

This is a balanced budget in name only, which sets the stage for another governmental crisis in 2014.

The largest tax reduction would go to people receiving retirement funds (an estimated $26 million), part of the governor's program to retain and attract retirees from other states.

It would lift the base income tax exemption for retirement income from $6,000 to $10,000 per year.

The governor's goal might be a good one — to make Maine more competitive with other retiree havens with no income tax.

But here's the larger problem: While the budget is very detailed in how it will cut state services — mostly for children, the disabled and the elderly — the line items for three tax breaks are simply blank.

It's like making a family budget and arbitrarily leaving out three clearly anticipated and unavoidable expenses just because they make the budget appear balanced.

If included, this budget would go from a supposed $6.5 million surplus to a likely $21 million deficit beginning in 2014.

The governor and Legislature came to office vowing to cut "welfare," a word that conjures images of pot-smoking bums too lazy to work. By all means, cut them out.

But when you read the list of proposed cuts, a large number clearly have nothing to do with welfare cheats and able-bodied people who choose not to work.

They include cuts to adult mental health crisis services, Head Start, contracts for residential mental health services, drugs for the elderly, foster care, smoking cessation and home health visits to keep people out of nursing homes.

Next week, legislators should vote "no" on on this budget and go back to the drawing board until it is truly balanced.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

Well stated

All so true. Makes no sense.

Zack Lenhert's picture


HOLD UP A SECOND!!!! I thought tax breaks paid for themselves? We apparently need to cut them more until this effect starts to happen.

Jason Theriault's picture

I don't want to hear tax break.

I don't want to hear about tax breaks while reading about how they are going to cut programs like Head start.

Democrats, just stall till November.

Steve  Dosh's picture

State budget skips the cost of tax breaks

Ed. Sunday 15:15 hst
Glad you caught that ?  You know what , Republicans ?
" You can fool some of the people some of the time , all the people some of the time , but you can't fool all the people all the time ." You can quote us on that • 
They're called earmarks on the Federal level . Who's the tallest hog at the trough now ? Lotta' finger pointing going on , huh ? Alo'ha from here /s Steve ?


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...