SAD 52 residents speak out about failed budget

GREENE — Residents told SAD 52 directors Thursday night that the 2012-13 budget was defeated last week, in part, because it was too high and positions were eliminated at the same time raises were handed out.

Approximately 50 residents attended the school board meeting at Greene Central School Gym to discuss why the $23 million-plus spending proposal was rejected by less than 10 percent of voters in Greene, Leeds and Turner. The May 9 vote was 172-182. The budget is nearly $300,000 more than this year's budget.

Directors appeared surprised when many in attendance said they opposed the budget because of the staffing cuts and because it was too much money.

Board Chairman Elizabeth Bullard said it was the duty of the board to do due diligence in re-evaluating the budget. She said while many residents have told her the board should reduce the budget, no one has ever made a specific recommendation on where cuts should be made.

Darlene Zupancic said she opposed the staffing cuts.

"I don't want to take away from the kids. I think they should put the money back in and let the taxes go up," said the mother of a high school senior and a sixth-grader.

While she did not vote in the first referendum, she said she definitely will vote at the next budget meeting June 5 and final referendum June 12.

Resident Brenda Terrio attributed the budget rejection to failure to fully explain the board's decisions. She said she had trouble with some getting raises while others got "pink slips." She said the board erred in eliminating the volunteer coordinators.

"If you find things to cut, so be it. If not, come back and tell us why," she said.

Woodsman Nat Bell urged the board to rethink the education process and become more efficient.

"There is more than one way to skin a cat," he said. "While teachers work hard, other people work hard, too, he said, and must find ways to compensate for lost income."

Resident Steven Goulet said he's seen the school budget go from $6 million to $23 million.

He put the blame for much of the increase on the teachers' unions.

"Teachers only have to work 125 days a year while most people work 356," he said. "The towns need input on the union negotiations," he said. And comparing salaries to other areas instead of local incomes is misleading, he added.

"Some of you think the budget is too low. I don't know where you live or what you have for a paycheck," he said.

With the large number of kids dropping out of school, it's obvious that throwing money at the schools was not working, he said.

School board member Peter Ricker said the board should present a budget that's $50,000 to $100,000 less. Other members supported the move.

However, one resident pointed out that a $50,000 to $100,000 cut in a $300,000 increase is still a higher budget.

School board member Diana Morgan said she thought directors had proposed a good budget.

"Any additional cuts will cut into programming," she said.

Superintendent Henry Alberti urged residents to attend the school board's budget workshop at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 23, at the Leeds Central School.

A district budget meeting will be held at 6 p.m. June 5 at Leavitt Area High School in Turner, followed by a final referendum on June 12 in each town.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

Mr. Goulet's quote, regarding

Mr. Goulet's quote, regarding the number of days people work, puzzles me. Most teachers work between 181 and 185 days per year. This does not account for the many days they work beyond their contract. Many workers get at least one, if not two, days off each week. If you crunch those numbers, "most people" would work anywhere between 261 days, for a 5 day work week, to 313 days, for a 6 day work week. A number of people work 4 day weeks, which would account for 208 work days per year. The numbers reported in the article seemed "fuzzy" to me. Good luck with the school budget in SAD 52.

Robert McQueeney's picture

"I don't want to take away

"I don't want to take away from the kids. I think they should put the money back in and let the taxes go up," said the mother of a high school senior and a sixth-grader.

The above statement fully illustrates why we are in such bankruptcy these days with municipal budgets. This mother does not realize that when taxes take so much from people and their homes, that they are indeed taking away from the kids. If Mom and dad are taxed to the point that they can not afford to take their kids to the beach on a summer day, what is the advantage to the children? If budgets for schools are so high, that it prevents families from being families, where is the good in that?

All things have to be balanced. You need a good affordable home (not a McMansion), you need time together as a family, a reliable car (not necessarily a brand new loaded SUV), good municipal services and good schools. You cannot blow everybody's budget on one aspect at the expense of all other aspects.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...