By Greg Harris, unverified — Mon, 12/07/2009 - 19:11
Yes, hazy dementia. I do not think I stuttered. Or was unclear. HAZY DEMENTIA!! That is all that I can think of that explains their goofy demented behavior on that night. And many others come to think of it.
I anxiously await the smell you claim is looming.
Make sure you spell my name right. I am a Gregory not a Gregg.
By Greg Harris, unverified — Mon, 12/07/2009 - 17:10
I respond to your hate.
You and your clan started with the false allegations against Steve McAllister.
You and your clan have been hatefully, behind your cloak of anonymity, attacking Ripley, Ivey and Young.
Why because they exercised a legal option in her employment contract, that she wrote and negotiated.
You should be upset with Sharon for making it a possibility and ultimately a reality.
I have a big mouth, yes, you don't like it. You cannot possibly claim to speak for the masses.
You haven't removed yourself from the front of your computer for the last week waiting to attack anyone who has an opposing view from yours.
I throw out facts and my opinion, you throw out unsubstantiated allegations and attacks against me and anyone who exposes your lies.
I do not and have never claimed to speak for anyone but myself, unlike you who attempts to put words in my mouth through your own questions then later try to use them as fact.
By Greg Harris, unverified — Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:38
Thanks for bringing it up.
What I am mad about, is that our town manager (male or female) came demanding a raise from our taxpayers during a severe economic downturn, when many Paris taxpayers were losing their jobs, losing benefits, have hours cut so their superiors could get a bonus or a raise, many stuggling to afford their current property taxes.
Her solution? Cut the hours and benefits of the employees of the town office from full time to part time status.
Nice. She cuts the hours of four employees to get her raise.
The median household income in Paris is about $34,000. The median single income in Paris is about $18,000. Sharon Jackson was being paid $61,000.00 plus a benefits package worth about $20,000.00 more.
Sharon was demanding even more, but was openly going to cut the income of four other families who likely fall into or near the median brackets.
Not only had she not done a single thing in Paris to raise and increase tax revenues in Paris, we now learn that she infact falsified documents to elected officials, voters, taxpayers, and state and federal agencies in her fraudulant efforts to make herself look good by falsely and fraudulantly increasing our bond rating.
Yes I am mad that Skip and Ray happily handed over a fat raise and contract to someone who had done absolutely nothing to deserve it.
By Greg Harris, unverified — Mon, 12/07/2009 - 14:24
Marijuana? No.
Drug problem? No
Me growing marijuana? No.
Is it fair to suggest? No. It is an outright lie.
Where do you dream this stuff up?
Again, you are writing the story that you want to hear, but nothing based on any facts.
More false attacks in an attempt to silence someone who is tearing down your house of cards and showing that the Paris Citizens for Responsible Government and the Paris Reporter are a large group of liars.
By Greg Harris, unverified — Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:45
Apparently you did not read the article a few days prior.
I support a recall ordinance.
In fact, I have submitted two recall petitions.
One for Raymond and one for Lloyd.
I feel that the one we have, as written, is a very shabby ordinance, but it is all I have to work with.
This one passed by such a margin because the people of this town agree that we need a recall ordinance, theyjust did not believe that such a poorly written and unvetted ordinance would ever be ut before the voters for approval.
By Greg Harris, unverified — Mon, 12/07/2009 - 11:37
And that total equals a $7800 salary raise over a two year period plus the additional costs to the taxpayers for the increase in other benefits paid by the town, plus a new 5 year extended contract to go along with it.
$8000 was close enough even though it would have actually been more.
Yes, hazy dementia. I do
Yes, hazy dementia. I do not think I stuttered. Or was unclear. HAZY DEMENTIA!! That is all that I can think of that explains their goofy demented behavior on that night. And many others come to think of it.
I anxiously await the smell you claim is looming.
Make sure you spell my name right. I am a Gregory not a Gregg.
You're all talk. No action.
My words surely have enough
My words surely have enough meaning and power to get your hackles up.
You cannot get enough of the attempts to insult me.
It is fun to watch you squirm.
Sharon did enough to make herself look bad, I just point them out and remind people as you bring them up.
I respond to your hate. You
I respond to your hate.
You and your clan started with the false allegations against Steve McAllister.
You and your clan have been hatefully, behind your cloak of anonymity, attacking Ripley, Ivey and Young.
Why because they exercised a legal option in her employment contract, that she wrote and negotiated.
You should be upset with Sharon for making it a possibility and ultimately a reality.
I have a big mouth, yes, you don't like it. You cannot possibly claim to speak for the masses.
You haven't removed yourself from the front of your computer for the last week waiting to attack anyone who has an opposing view from yours.
I throw out facts and my opinion, you throw out unsubstantiated allegations and attacks against me and anyone who exposes your lies.
I do not and have never claimed to speak for anyone but myself, unlike you who attempts to put words in my mouth through your own questions then later try to use them as fact.
The insanity of it all.
Love Greg
Is there an echo in here?
Is there an echo in here?
Thanks for bringing it
Thanks for bringing it up.
What I am mad about, is that our town manager (male or female) came demanding a raise from our taxpayers during a severe economic downturn, when many Paris taxpayers were losing their jobs, losing benefits, have hours cut so their superiors could get a bonus or a raise, many stuggling to afford their current property taxes.
Her solution? Cut the hours and benefits of the employees of the town office from full time to part time status.
Nice. She cuts the hours of four employees to get her raise.
The median household income in Paris is about $34,000. The median single income in Paris is about $18,000. Sharon Jackson was being paid $61,000.00 plus a benefits package worth about $20,000.00 more.
Sharon was demanding even more, but was openly going to cut the income of four other families who likely fall into or near the median brackets.
Not only had she not done a single thing in Paris to raise and increase tax revenues in Paris, we now learn that she infact falsified documents to elected officials, voters, taxpayers, and state and federal agencies in her fraudulant efforts to make herself look good by falsely and fraudulantly increasing our bond rating.
Yes I am mad that Skip and Ray happily handed over a fat raise and contract to someone who had done absolutely nothing to deserve it.
Marijuana? No. Drug problem?
Marijuana? No.
Drug problem? No
Me growing marijuana? No.
Is it fair to suggest? No. It is an outright lie.
Where do you dream this stuff up?
Again, you are writing the story that you want to hear, but nothing based on any facts.
More false attacks in an attempt to silence someone who is tearing down your house of cards and showing that the Paris Citizens for Responsible Government and the Paris Reporter are a large group of liars.
Apparently you did not read
Apparently you did not read the article a few days prior.
I support a recall ordinance.
In fact, I have submitted two recall petitions.
One for Raymond and one for Lloyd.
I feel that the one we have, as written, is a very shabby ordinance, but it is all I have to work with.
This one passed by such a margin because the people of this town agree that we need a recall ordinance, theyjust did not believe that such a poorly written and unvetted ordinance would ever be ut before the voters for approval.
You might be right. But I
You might be right.
But I doubt it.
You statement is based
You statement is based on?
Ignorance isnt a crime either, lucky for you.
And that total equals a
And that total equals a $7800 salary raise over a two year period plus the additional costs to the taxpayers for the increase in other benefits paid by the town, plus a new 5 year extended contract to go along with it.
$8000 was close enough even though it would have actually been more.
Luckily we are rid of that tyrant.