In a long list of DA's on the docket for a position which they should not be Malony pretty much fits the bill. Her decision not to attach any further charges and allow for bullying on this mans property fits her pretty well that she wants to make friends with SAM and the NRA. There is a weakness and disconnection and she merely wanted the job; instead of having the personal fortitude to do the job. If she should be presented with any further gun cases; then perhaps she should recuse herself as any New York attorney would make these charges stick. If she wanted to be a DA and meet and greet with the NRA and SAM for being a Democrat in name only then she has succeeded and made a difference as to why we should look for other names instead of an election year Princess and darling. Including Malony wanting the entire records sealed I'd ask for a personal inventory of associations, those who she meets with, whether or not she does this for political establishment, and whether or not she should be dismissed and disbarred for life from practicing law. She wants to allow for bullying and sealed records; I'm sure a few federal lawyers could take over and handle any further cases as she could be a weaker link and perhaps facing corruption as to how she has handled this case.
Instead of vote for Malony the NRA and SAM should post that she's bought and paid for to their whims. That she has no process of evidence, over promoted, and wanted the job instead of being able to do the job. Disbar and dismiss Malony as DA!
You know what I'm saying you just don't want to admit to yourself what I'm saying is perfectly natural in the sales and business world. It was an intense and chaotic time to be involved in loss prevention. You talk of it like it's something which should never be mentioned or even theorized about; then you mock people about it. As well as the investigations those happened after I'd been "burned" and people found out I'd been recruited as a transfer manager to make sure those tactics weren't used in other stores as well. Basically, the clean up guy to keep stores honest and with a better inventory record system. I like a good, clean, and honest system; you don't seem to like that Jeff Johnson. This means a real "burn" wherein if you are found out the entire crew that you worked with turns against you including a loss prevention manager who can summon the feds for ongoing investigations which in reality find nothing. I'll just cut my losses right here; you advocated the model of breaching confidentiality for students and cutting special education, any time a loss prevention guy shows up you get a little bit more scared, and the timid nature of mockery means that at one time or another they've had you; until you figured out how to "flip" them. Am I right Jeff; I don't "flip" so easily and I don't like that insulting motion; I've met a lot of folks like you before. In the end mockery seems to be the most common route to frustrate someone. You don't know that line of work and I'm glad you can find it insulting; here's to praying you live in interesting times and find the same occupation and vocation as I found.
I'm not a security guard I was trusted by my former district and regional manager to obtain information on who was swapping sales and who was misrepresenting digital and computer based technologies. The answers I want you've already provided to me and now I'm not going to be nice. The friend who is just below a Superintendent who you admire for business reasons, tell me do they advocate the measures of Kaplan in obtaining and breaching student information so as to deny them services to keep the schools budgeting correct? Does your wife use the pretense of breaching student information to obtain it and deny them special education? I was an early childhood education major who broke ranks with Kaplan over exchanging student names and progressions. You'd do best not to define me as a "security guard" these measures are being overseen by Peggy Rotoundo after I filed the report and provided the syllabus. Does your friend use student externships or internships as they maybe classified in Auburn? Perhaps you might know better not to insult me; what's the name of the friend? You go for the progressions and full names of students to breach confidentiality waivers which are in place; is that the good business practices you want in place?
It also caused me to be "burned" working for my company with several investigations. Keep the head up the rear end and try discrediting everyone for fun right Jeff? You like insulting people until it starts getting a little bit closer to home. When it does you want someone to rush into it and try to stall whatever might be insulting you. When it comes down to it all you have is a business mind cycle and if anyone disagrees with you, you bully them and insult them all the more. Known a lot of people like you; now does your wife openly advocate the same model and does the friend in the higher-rankings hold the same esteem for Kaplan?
I know a lot about modern business; as a former private-sector loss prevention analyst. I know that to someone like you I'm just a shark; wanting the real answers, and I have no problems or qualms with that so long as I get the answers I want. Anything else you want to say about me; by the way insulting my mental health is not the best way to get along well with others. You don't like those in lower social standings and you want to play it off as an insult to mental health and intelligence. You go right ahead I won't be so kind in the next posting.
I love the conservative comments on here because half of these folks don't know rape is used as a weapon, drug cartels decapitate those who stand against them, and all they preach on about is entering the country legally. Considering that we helped create and cause these problems along with the knowledge that they wanted it painted out of the picture it cannot be done that way. Instead they want a long standing xenophobic and racist picture of how they view others. Private prisons in California recruit former law enforcement officers with racist jackets; along with former DEA agents. In that mixture children who were born here are also held; now it makes me wonder if any of the posters have a donation that they've paid in the past to keep those prisons functioning? I mean really the tide and era of xenophobia creates a much more common strain that they feel better suited toward keeping themselves above the fray.
They don't know what it's like to escape rape as a weapon, they suggest HIV/AIDS in those cases as being overblown, and that perhaps I shouldn't be protecting that. I should just white wash and keep it toward better protecting America. Of course rape was used as a weapon along with atrocities continually mounting against the Native-Americans. Does, that better explain the mixture of conservative apathy? This is our land, no it's not, we need reforms, yes we do, and we also need to realize that the dangers imposed by rape gangs and violent cartels are the realistic leanings of why people flee. As well as one of those who had commented that he held a piece of Mexican realty and did not feel it was dangerous. For that not to be dangerous that would include bribery, setting up a safety net, and financing cartels to stay away from his little slice of heaven. Which means an indirect funding and donation to the Mexican crime cartels to empower them; will any of these xenophobes debate that?
Of course you bring in the business ideology because it always makes sense to leave the next generation under-equipped and in the factory mindset of being conditioned to a non-business-centrist ideology. A couple of things will hurt except you are not the one drawing a paycheck and talking high and mighty about teachers like they are dogs. This is the problem with a business man in a three-piece suit who acts like he runs a great business and that it should apply itself with a caste system toward those in the lower social standings. This is a delusional aspect of thinking and it creates a questionable metaphor of asking the business practices that you engage in? Which means no computers in the classrooms they would be cut back upon, how do you craft the "lean-mean" teaching machines, is this just another joke from the business machines which have no truthfully relevant answers?
Just take the pain because it feels better folded up in a manila envelope wrapped up in denial? Along with stock quotes and running tickers of countries which have known better to invest into the technological front instead of the caste front? How often are we weakened by this dogmatic front of creating a lower caste simply because the businesses must fit into the puzzle pieces of the suffering of those less-inclined and that business managers must be appointed? As can be seen in the failures of the Detroit Police Department of taking color coded cases with no overtime; is that the great business you start digressing that we should follow? Stick to the three-piece suits and keep the business portfolios instead of preaching the gospel of the greatness wrapped in a delicate caste system.
The only thing you fight for sir, is the investments, and stock portfolios. Since it is a verified identity does that mean we should take the GPL route and start looking at publicly disclosed stocks, investments, and portfolio ventures to get and gain a better understanding of what you "fight" for? I've seen better misdirection when I worked in loss prevention. That and when they started threatening and intimidating workers with insider trading charges. Managers were telling us to sell stock, buy it back on the cheap, and take it as much as we could. You can comment on what we fight for Mark; but in the end if we start proving stocks, portfolios, investments, and perhaps trades with countries guilty of human rights violations; will anyone have any real respect for that?
These scandals cost lives, they cost families, and they destroyed families as well. Interesting that the "Heritage Foundation" also likens using astro-turfing or rat screwing for their operations. This letter pretty much placates just how much Republicans will throw under their force or use covert means when they dislike facts being published. As a former loss prevention analyst in the private sector; the very means of discrediting is something which all but destroyed me personally. Now, imagine all of the counter-intelligence used if someone found out about missing equipment and was told to keep quiet about it. All of the misinformation, misdirection, and petty squabbles points back to Bush administration pen holders being appointed well above their stations. A ruse like this during Reagan would have had people supporting the noise making of a former spook. Twenty years later; aw, he finds out the lame duck intelligence routine of throwing blame around can be just as easily seen. Don't name Republicans clipping the budget, don't talk about the factors that the IRS detailed Tea Party bomb plots from investigations, and don't talk about the factors that MS-13 and Romney are in love with each other. Greatest misinformation I've ever seen is detailing MS-13 as "protection" they were death squads who were pardoned under Reagan and allowed to thrive and prosper here along with providing investments to launder and clean money. Bain Capitol received investment from them as well; it's all in how you don't want information deleted under the nose.
Oh, yes a cover up and of course e-mails and rat screwing tactics designed by Republicans to greatly alter the tide of information which is already out there. Look at this folks Santa gave me just what I wanted for Christmas with a bow tie on top. Mr. Cipolloso why is it that the US military intelligence networks still have not devised a way to handle missing digital equipment, why are loss prevention retailers continually amiss when it comes to describing how many scanners, and other pieces of electronics go missing under their watch? Why do they delete former contacts from various profiles when their workings come to light? Oh, Santa you've given me the biggest bag of fail and I thank you!
Along with Republicans continually limiting funding for their agencies in and around consulate offices. Now, I spent a year in loss prevention before being effectively burned by one of the types just like you; someone who wanted the job, not who could do the job as my great-grandfather used to say. I don't like the tactics that you folks use and I don't like how it discredits others when you see fit to use it. And, in general since you use it; I just plain don't like you. Actions like that make it easier for people to forget; that somehow dog fighting rings and trafficking rings are getting digital scanners and laptops or desktops to effectively tap law enforcement.
I think that it's time we submitted additional information asking the investments, strategies, portfolio's, and filed for other information requests on whether or not the RIAA is engaged in current stock information swaps; along with engaging in trading with HSBC or other cartel and syndicated investment firms. Considering she can't repay and just how bloody, violent, corruptible, and the streams of influence peddling the group may have it's time to damage it straight and make sure every personal inch destroys it. As well as probing it further for trading into private prison companies; if you can make the cases against the RIAA for insider trading and involvement then you work to destroy it.