Dan, I agree that it does not reflect well on the State. Now, answer me this, if you are billing me for something and then I change the rules and you continue billing me at the old rules, which cause me to over pay you. Who is at fault? You for over billing or me for not telling you I changed the rules.
The Speaker did repay about $450K of the $1.6 million after he was forced to sell his business.
Dan, I just didn't get you today. I have gotten you multiple times.
Hey, offer still stands, contact Patti if you think that the Obama's daughters were not listed as senior staffers and she can ban the user that was wrong or we can just mark that up as one of the times you were proven WRONG by me AGAIN. So, I guess you can just go on defending the scrupulous Keynesian President.
Dan, the reason you are passing is because you know that I am RIGHT and you are WRONG (AGAIN). If you are so sure that I am right, take me up on the offer and Patti can ban the account of the person who is wrong. Let her be the judge.
I'm not really surprised that Dan didn't take me up on my offer considering he "thinks" he is "always right", but it looks like he believes I'm right. One would think if he was actually right, he would jump at the chance of actually getting rid of me, but instead he appears to want to keep me. Oh, well ....
Please clarify
Dan,
Just to be clear. Are you saying political groups, such as Democrats or Republicans, should be not be using public buildings for meeting spaces.
valid point
Dan, I agree that it does not reflect well on the State. Now, answer me this, if you are billing me for something and then I change the rules and you continue billing me at the old rules, which cause me to over pay you. Who is at fault? You for over billing or me for not telling you I changed the rules.
The Speaker did repay about $450K of the $1.6 million after he was forced to sell his business.
are you sure?
Dan, are you sure he never paid back any of the money? I almost positive a portion of the $1.6 million was paid back after he liquidated his business.
too bad
Heck, if Dan had done some research, he could of produced the same, but instead, he just post and leaves it to you to prove his case.
Well then I guess the offer is off the table, sorry Dan. Maybe next time you bite.
so wrong
Dan, I just didn't get you today. I have gotten you multiple times.
Hey, offer still stands, contact Patti if you think that the Obama's daughters were not listed as senior staffers and she can ban the user that was wrong or we can just mark that up as one of the times you were proven WRONG by me AGAIN. So, I guess you can just go on defending the scrupulous Keynesian President.
what?
Dan, the 124th Legislature did not do that. What are you talking about?
your passing because
Dan, the reason you are passing is because you know that I am RIGHT and you are WRONG (AGAIN). If you are so sure that I am right, take me up on the offer and Patti can ban the account of the person who is wrong. Let her be the judge.
curious
is the following statement racist:
"You cannot go to a 7-11 or Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian Accent."
word of honor
Dan, we'll have Patti ban the user who is wrong. Sounds to me, that you think I'm right and you appear to be WRONG AGAIN.
no surprise
I'm not really surprised that Dan didn't take me up on my offer considering he "thinks" he is "always right", but it looks like he believes I'm right. One would think if he was actually right, he would jump at the chance of actually getting rid of me, but instead he appears to want to keep me. Oh, well ....
Dan, just accept the offer and I'm out of here.