Chairman Brad Adley's suggestion to create a Citizen Budget Survey with which to gauge public opinion and better guide the board in budget work died for lack of a motion after two department heads and Selectman Greg Buccina argued against it.
Selectman Frank DiConzo initiated discussion on the survey, which was tabled from last month's board meeting for tweaking before rollout.
Prior to that meeting, selectmen convened a workshop to draft survey questions to better guide answers from the public.
On Thursday night, Puiia handed out copies of the newly-tweaked survey to selectmen, after which, DiConzo said he liked the changes.
Town Manager Carlo Puiia then read the first question, which asked respondents if they wanted to pare firefighters from the department.
Police Chief Stacy Carter then asked selectmen how they intended to limit respondents to one survey response only.
He was told the board would only count those on which respondents included their name and address, which could then be checked to learn if they are Rumford residents.
Buccina, who has opposed the survey since its inception, again criticized the board for reviving it after it was killed last month due to a lack of funds to get it out to the public.
"This is very close-minded," he said. "I don't agree with this, because it's not a good idea to arbitrarily decide to cut employees. That's going to be the least bang for the buck."
Adley then suggested they change the question from a yes or no response to one that would elicit comments.
Puiia suggested altering the questions to ask for the respondent's opinion on the level of service, but both fire Chief Robert Chase and police Chief Stacy Carter said that wouldn't work either.
They argued that more information was needed to tell respondents what would happen to municipal services if cuts were made.
Then, Selectman Mark Belanger said that likely only 100 people would respond to the survey, rendering the responses as a minority opinion based on the town's entire population.
"I'm not getting a warm fuzzy feeling from this and it was my idea," Adley said.
"I think it has some value, but we're not going to support funding it," Buccina said.
The idea then died, prompting Puiia to reiterate that residents can always contact him and share opinions.
Terry Karkos/Sun Journal
During the public comment session at Thursday night's Rumford selectmen meeting, resident Norman Charleston asks the board if it intends to replace the 1977 Swift River sewer pumping system, which failed again and filled his basement and basements of other nearby residents with sewage. Public Works Superintendent Andy Russell told selectmen that a new system is currently being installed that should fix the problem.
verified Shhhh, don't tell anyone that the same board that has asked the employees to sacrifice by taking unpaid days off, just gave Black Mountain $1,000 for fireworks.
With the idea of hiring someone to suggest efficency efforts and now a survey to the citizens on cutting positions this is what I am seeing....selectman trying to find a scapegoat (and wasting money doing it). Politics is a hard business boys. You have to do what is right for the town but at the same time you have to guarantee you'll get votes for the next election. Instead of wasting time trying to find someone to blame when the citizens cry foul, why not use that energy to research facts and figures to find the best option. Bite the bullet and do your job boys, Rumord needs leaders not cowards.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.