FARMINGTON — An Auburn man was sentenced Friday to serve three years of a 10-year prison sentence for sexually touching a young girl.
Zachariah Robert Tardif, 24, was ordered to serve six years of probation, to go through sex-offender counseling to his probation officer's satisfaction, to register on the sex-offender registry and to have no contact with children under 18, except his own.
Tardif pleaded guilty to the unlawful sexual contact charge on June 11 in an agreement with the state. Tardif did not agree with all of the state's evidence but sought to avoid a trial.
He was indicted in November 2009.
The incidents occurred between July 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2008, according to the indictment.
The victim said the touching happened more than once; Tardif said it happened only once.
An initial complaint was made by a social worker in September 2007, who reported the victim said Tardif had shown her pornographic material and inappropriately touched her, according to a Wilton police affidavit filed with the court.
The case was closed due to insufficient information.
On Sept. 3, 2009, Wilton police responded to a second report of child sexual abuse against the victim. Wilton police Lt. E. Page Reynolds interviewed the girl, who at the time was between 5 and 9. She told police she was molested by Tardif while she was alone with him, according to the affidavit.
In response to the allegations, Tardif told police last year that while engaged in horseplay, he was tickling her and inappropriately touched her.
The child was seriously affected by what she has gone through, Assistant District Attorney Andrew Robinson told the Franklin County Superior Court on Friday. There was a betrayal of trust, he said.
Tardif has never apologized or taken responsibility, Robinson said.
The state believed three years in prison would be too short, he said, but the victim wanted it to be over and did not want to go through a trial.
The state was willing to accept the sentence because it would give closure to the victim, Robinson said.
Three years in prison was the maximum amount of prison time the state and defense previously agreed upon in the plea agreement.
Witnesses and a friend described Tardif as a supportive, caring father who helped others. One witness said the child was already sexually abused prior to meeting Tardif.
Tardif addressed the court, saying he always followed the rules. He agreed to take the plea agreement to prevent the child from going through a trial and to get his family back together as quickly as possible, he said.
“I am truly sorry for what happened,” Tardif said.
David Sanders, Tardif's attorney, described his client as a family man who supported his family. He said Tardif did not have a record, and was at the lowest risk to be a repeat offender.
He argued for Tardif to serve two years in prison. There is substantial punishment going on, Sanders said. Tardif is going to be on the sex-offender registry for the rest of his life, Sanders said.
Justice Michaela Murphy said she was somewhat reluctant to accept the sentencing cap but wanted to spare the child, who was already suffering the ordeal of going through a trial. She told Tardif he had a right to have the sentence reviewed.


lessor sentence to spare the victom from trial? O o o k
... since when is a convicted person given a lighter sentence based on the elleged victom not feelilng like going to trial? I have never seen this before. It says he was playing with the little girl, and got a little to feely with her. THAT would piss me off! As a parent. I would wonder how many small children he has already done this to. And, how many will go unheard. A person like this, usually tells law enforcement that "this is the first time I done something like this" Bull shiP! They alwyas deny further activity, they always want the victom to be non credible as a witness.
DO you watch DATELINE NBC WITH CHRIS JOHANSON?? He interviews these offenders, at the child's home, as they are making an attempt to have sx relations with a minor. Law enforcement is right outside the home during the sting. I sugguest that you watch TO CATCH A PREDATOR and base your opinion from there.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (5)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Something's missing.
This is spooky. You mean to tell me they convicted him on a child's statement alone? A young child previously molested? A child who the paper reports was already seeing a social worker at age 3-7?
I'm not defending a perp believe me, but if what the paper reports is accurate, there wasn't much evidence at all.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (6)
Agree (13)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Your right there wasn't any
Your right there wasn't any evidence at all just what the child said and Zachs statment about the ruff play. And YES the child was molested long before he meet her. But in todays world you are guilty until you can prove you are not and in this case even though he told the truth of what happened accidently touched shin during ruff play and stoped immediatly. He still is in jail. I believe with all my heart that she is still being hurt, I love this little girl and know her well. It just rips my heart out. But it saddens me to think that a little boy have to be with out his father for so long and that a new baby will not have the chance bond with the same man. Those of you who are the ones to judge and say nasty, hateful things should make sure your glass houses are shatter proff cause the same thing could happen to you!! This is my son and I am proud of the way he has handled himself through all of this!!! Natalie Tardif
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.They Didn't Convict Him
According to the story: "Tardif pleaded guilty." Apparently he and his lawyer were more than happy to take a deal rather than go to trial. This tells me that what is missing are details that would have sent him to jail for far longer if he went to trial. It still amazes me when people imply that THE VICTIM is somehow deficient or at fault.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (10)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Oil Change
Bubba's run'in a Big House special for new customers. It's your turn Zachariah da Liah.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (6)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.