Am I the only one who sees something wrong with the April 29 front-page article about a person accused of cheating welfare? I read a few paragraphs and I am enraged. The paragraph starts with, “Her court-appointed attorney … “
Someone has been accused of defrauding the state out of $10,000 and, adding insult to injury, the public has to pay for her lawyer.
Those are the kinds of things people need to focus on, not wasting time and money over a removed mural.
Peter Neal, Minot