Lewiston superintendent: Scores don't reflect student progress

LEWISTON — Recent state test scores show Lewiston students in grades three through eight changed little from the past year, down slightly in reading, up slightly in math.

Most Lewiston elementary school scores were lower than state averages.

In math, 49 percent of Lewiston elementary students were proficient in math in 2011, compared to 48 percent in 2010. Statewide, 63 percent of students were proficient in 2011.

In reading, 56 percent of Lewiston students were proficient in 2011, down from 58 percent in 2010. Statewide, 72 percent of students last year were proficient in reading.

Lewiston School Superintendent Bill Webster said the New England Common Assessment Program scores were disappointing, “and make clear the magnitude of work before us. At the same time, I want to emphasize that the NECAP is the wrong test administered at the wrong time.”

A more accurate reflection of student growth is the Northwest Evaluation Association test, which Lewiston administers. But a lot of weight is put on the NECAP test scores, Webster said. Families look at the scores, “and to the casual observer, Lewiston scores are not what you'd want to see” when picking a school. Those scores “will always be disappointing until we get to a better test,” he said.

Educators could spend the month of September grilling students to do better on the test, “but that's not what schools exist for.”

One problem with the NECAP test is that it is given to students in October, not long after they've returned from summer vacation. That's a bigger disadvantage to Lewiston students than other, richer communities, Webster said.

Students in poorer households have a greater loss of learning in the summer than students in higher-income households, because children in higher-income families are more likely to be involved in enrichment activities and reading.

Longley Elementary School on Birch Street, where the majority of students are poor and learning English, had the lowest scores: 15 percent of Longley students were proficient in reading, down 2 percentage points from 2010. Longley's math scores were up 5 percentage points.

Lewiston schools with the highest scores were Geiger and Farwell, both in middle-income neighborhoods. Seventy-three percent of students at Geiger tested at proficient levels in reading; at Farwell, 69 percent were proficient in reading. Sixty-one percent of students at Geiger were proficient in math; at Farwell, 63 percent tested proficient in math.

Maine Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen has said the NECAP test will be retired after 2013. Maine will administer a more sophisticated assessment system in 2014-15 that will provide more comprehensive information about how students are learning. Maine is one of 28 states building an improved assessment system.

“Those assessments will do more than simply hold schools accountable under the outdated and sometimes counterproductive No Child Left Behind Act,” Bowen said in a prepared statement. 

“Coupled with information systems that can track learner growth over time, we’ll be able to provide teachers with quality information about how kids are doing, so they can develop and adapt personal learning plans for each child,” Bowen said.

Test results are being dissected and a presentation will be given to the Lewiston School Committee on Feb. 27, Webster said.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Mike Lachance's picture
verified

I dont care WHAT test you

I dont care WHAT test you administer, with a 15% reading proficiency NCLB is indicating the truth: FAILURE.

Seriously, Is the School Department saying the test is unfair to "poor" children? Or is it something else.

Dumbing down the tests is not the answer. Fabricating a test that removes profiency from the equation is not the answer. Back in the day students were "held back" if they flunked. That doesnt happen much, if ever these days.. (the "were ALL winners" mentality prevails)... and the flunkees get moved along right beside the A and B students into the next grade.

If the kids are flunking they need to be held back. Even if it means we have a bunch of 13 year old 2nd graders at Longley.

Reason's picture
verified

Personal Learning Plans

The philosophy is nice, but do they realize what amount of time it takes to develop this plan? Then what about the realization on maintance of the plan? Is this going to be done by the teacher? When will teachers really teach? Take 25 students and create plans for each one. Sounds great, but the time involved, and time to adjust each must happen..what daily, weekly, monthly? Should one teacher be doing it or should it be evaluated and done by all the teachers at the same grade level? A lot of questions to be answered before beginning this process. Even Auburn with the computers (IPads) will have difficulty with individual plans. Subliminal learners ...aren't we all as we sit in front of the computer screens or tvs?

Advertisement