D. Mitchell: Governor's cuts hurt cancer patients

Recently, Gov. Paul LePage released a budget proposal that includes drastic cuts to Medicaid. Not only would 65,000 Mainers lose coverage under his plan, but thousands of people with cancer would see their coverage completely eliminated.

That makes me sick.

Others, who would remain on Medicaid, would have their cancer prevention, treatment and services severely limited. Cancer patients would be limited to five hospital stays and 15 outpatient visits per year, which, I can assure you, is not nearly enough, and they would lose coverage or face limits on prescription drugs and treatment services.

Members of the Appropriations and Health and Human Services committees are currently reviewing the governor’s proposal. I urge them to reject his Medicaid cuts and protect those who rely on lifesaving cancer screenings and treatment.

I have family and friends, as I’m sure others do, who may be affected by this terrible proposal and I am disgusted. Battling cancer, or another chronic condition, is hard enough without having to worry about how to pay for medical bills or, worse, forgoing lifesaving treatment because you can’t afford the costs.

Diane Mitchell, Rumford

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

rdarluv's picture
verified

Still, nobody here wants to

Still, nobody here wants to answer those questions? How would you suggest we cover the DHHS shortfall? Which programs should be cut instead, or which programs should we take from to cover the DHHS

Dan? Riml? Dosh?

Answering the questions would require them to "cut" from someone else and they wouldn't have the brass to do it so they will not say it. They'd rather force republicans to do the hard work so they can chastise them another day, on another article.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Still no serious answers from

Still no serious answers from the top 3 liberal know-it-alls on the SJ blogs?? I am disappointed! I guess this is the end of the discussion.......

tron's picture

you are refusing to accept

you are refusing to accept the answers that we've given. eliminate the huge tax cuts for the wealthiest among us. THAT is what I would cut. Get it?

rdarluv's picture
verified

So would you like to add that

So would you like to add that .55 percent (that's barely over HALF a percent) back into the paychecks of everyone making $19,950 per year or more? That's the "huge" tax cut you keep talking about. How many folks reading this would like to see that?

tron's picture

I never said that, stop

I never said that, stop making thing up and stop the lies. You're really getting disgustingly malicious in you attempt to put words into my mouth. Stick to what I said, not your interpretation of it.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Dan, I am not putting words

Dan, I am not putting words into your mouth. I simply asked you a question. Here it is again: "So would you like to add that .55 percent (that's barely over HALF a percent) back into the paychecks of everyone making $19,950 per year or more?"

Do you see that little hooky looking thing at the end of my sentence??? <-- just like these? That is called a "question mark" and it means I am asking you a question. That isn't just my interpretation of the little hooky thingy, that's a fact.

rdarluv's picture
verified

I should add that the median

I should add that the median income for the "middle class" is around $33,000 per year, give or take depending on source. That means Dan wants to rescind the tax breaks LePage gave to the middle class along with the few rich........hmmm, I wonder what percentage of Mainers fall into the "middle class" versus the "upper class"? (or moguls as Dan calls them)

tron's picture

don't you ever get tired of

don't you ever get tired of telling lies, putting words in my mouth? Where do you get that I am in favor of eliminating taxes for the middle class, when all I've ever said is to eliminate the bonanza for the wealthiest? Making it up as you go along?

rdarluv's picture
verified

No lies from me Dan. The tax

No lies from me Dan. The tax break "bonanza" YOU want to rescind according to your MANY posts about it is the recent lowering of the top tax tier from 8.5% to 7.95% and that tier affects ALL Mainers making $19,950 per year and up........that include the middle class Dan. Maine's median income is 31782 and the national median income of the "middle class" is approx. $33,000, both WELL WITHIN the tax break YOU want to rescind. No lies from me Dan, you said it all by yourself all over the SJ blog on MANY strings.........your denial does not help your image here.

tron's picture

I love how you think if you

I love how you think if you keep repeating the same thing it will be true. But when I give my answer you always dismiss it and change the subject. It's like talking to a blank wall. I think the tax cut for the wealthy should be rescinded, and you believe we should throw people out of nursing homes and into the street. OK, I get it. Let's just agree to disagree, you want more money for yourself, and I want to treat people humanely.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Dan, I'm giving you control

Dan, I'm giving you control of the discussion! Let's talk about some real numbers here. Where would you set the top tier (so as to avoid the middle class) and at what percentage would you set the tax rate?

rdarluv's picture
verified

So are you now saying you

So are you now saying you want ONLY the wealthy cuts to be rescinded? Eg; We would have to add a special tax bracket like at $100,000? Is that what you are now saying?

rdarluv's picture
verified

Let's talk about some real

Let's talk about some real numbers here. Where would you set the top tier (so as to avoid the middle class) and at what percentage would you tax it?

rdarluv's picture
verified

now we know why Republicans

now we know why Republicans have such difficulty getting anything done in Washington........look what we've got to work with. A bunch of men and women that know it all but have NO answers......

tron's picture

Normal people, not the right

Normal people, not the right wing tea partyer, do not believe we should cut programs, instead rescind massive tax cuts for the wealthy that CREATED this 'deficit.' Got it? Did I dummy it down enough for you to understand?

rdarluv's picture
verified

You're right Dan, "normal

You're right Dan, "normal people" would just keep swiping that card until it's maxed out!.........guess what? It's now maxed out........the deficit existed before the cuts Dan and we all know it, repeating that just makes you look like the fool.....keep up the good work!

tron's picture

mark, the 'deficit' is $120

mark, the 'deficit' is $120 million, and the tax bonanza to the wealthy was $150 million. Now how can you say with a straight face that the 'deficit' existed BEFORE the tax cuts? That defies logic.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Dan, it wasn't a "tax

Dan, it wasn't a "tax bonanza" to the wealthy! It was a tax cut to ALL Mainers making $19950 or more.....that covers MOST Mainers.......even some high school kids. Enjoy your tax cut while you have it because if one of yours is elected next time around, he's gonna take it away from you.......

tron's picture

I'd like to see a comparison

I'd like to see a comparison of the benefits to the high school kids to the company moguls, and then claim the wealthiest didn't receive the overwhelming share of this tax cut.

rdarluv's picture
verified

You seem to be under the

You seem to be under the impression that tax bracket consists of only a few high school students and the rest all rich folks........how much do you make a year Dan? How many rich moguls do you think Maine has? (actually paying taxes in Maine anyway, we have to consider all the rich Hollywood liberals that call Maine home 49% of the year.)

tron's picture

you're the one trying to

you're the one trying to equate high school kids with the company moguls, then you accuse me of challenging you on the comparison? what hubris!

rdarluv's picture
verified

Noooooo, I am talking about

Noooooo, I am talking about ALL Mainers making $19950 per year or more which consists of MOST working Mainers. You're the one who completely ignored everyone between high school kids and the successful.........or "moguls" as you call them.

You've really got to stop trying to spin the discussion when you've already got your share of words invested in it. You make yourself look like a fool Dan. I'm concerned for you.....

tron's picture

You may think I look like a

You may think I look like a fool, but that's probably because you're looking in a mirror. You're the one doing the spinning, trying to put words in my mouth, distorting what I say to suit your needs. It won't work.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Ok, Dan you really ought to

Ok, Dan you really ought to just sit back and read the entire thread then tell me you don't look like a fool.......

tron's picture

obviously you're seeing

obviously you're seeing something through that FOX News filter you use that just isn't there.

rdarluv's picture
verified

I can't force you to see it

I can't force you to see it Dan, but rest assured, everyone else here can see it. Suit yourself but I am trying to help you.........

rdarluv's picture
verified

Seems as though we have a few

Seems as though we have a few people on here that always have the answers but are never able to tell us what they are........maybe they are just saving them for when they run for office themselves?

hawaiian's picture
verified

D. Mitchell: Governor's cuts hurt cancer patients

†hanks Diane 11.12.19 22:10 hst •
. .O u c h •  ßbrrr . .. People wonder - w h y - the US ranks 37th in world health indices after # 35 Dominica & # 36 Costa Rica ? Wonder no more everyone . Your Honorable Governor must seem rather heart-less to many of y'all they'ya √ http://www.pnhp.org/ows/index.php
~ Melé Kalikimaka to all hard working hourly wage earners , all EMS , nurses , doctors , police , fire , snow plowers , truck drivers , electricians , garbage removers , sanitary landfill workers , and to all unionized state personnel and other unionized workers located in Maine ~
We have a saying here , " To receive Alo'ha one must - g i v e - Alo'ha " /s, the Steve Dosh ohana , Pahoa HI 96778 usa ( for the 99% :)

rdarluv's picture
verified

Just think, if we had a big

Just think, if we had a big magical bottomless pot of money, everyone would be happy......but, we don't. How would you suggest we cover the DHHS shortfall Dianne? Which programs should be cut instead, or which programs should we take from to cover the DHHS shortfall?

Everybody wants our government to be more fiscally responsible, until it affects them.......it's the old "not in my backyard" syndrome. Take from somebody else instead........

tron's picture

how about republicans rescind

how about republicans rescind the massive tax cuts they gave the wealthy this year. No tax increase, just eliminate the bonanza they gave away during these tough times.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Dan, I asked you three days

Dan, I asked you three days ago on this story -> http://www.sunjournal.com/comment/89179#comment-89179
to please provide a link to the source of your "wealthy tax break" claim and you have yet to do so. When Tron doesn't respond it is usually because he can't.

Liberal rag stories don't count......link the actual information.

tron's picture

Well, mark, you know very

Well, mark, you know very well that the top tax rate was lowered substantially, and that affects you and your wealthy friends the most. So just suck it up, pass on your next plate of caviar, and help the less fortunate of this state. I know that's against your principles, but tough.

rdarluv's picture
verified

Dan it seems you agree that

Dan it seems you agree that the rich are paying the "top tax rate" when in the past you have insisted that the rich "don't pay their fair share".......yep, you're right! They pay MORE!

FYI: Maine's top tax rate starts at an annual salary of $19950 and Maine's median income is $31782.......many Mainers below the median income also benefit from any cuts to the top tier.

rdarluv's picture
verified

and while you are at it Dan,

and while you are at it Dan, why don't you answer the questions I have asked of Dianne and Dr. Dosh? How would you suggest we cover the DHHS shortfall? Which programs should be cut instead, or which programs should we take from to cover the DHHS

tron's picture

you're simply ignoring the

you're simply ignoring the very valid and useful idea, simply because you want your next caviar fix. Sorry, I think people's health is more important than you, or your friends, saving money on the next airplane.

rdarluv's picture
verified

So what you're saying Dan, is

So what you're saying Dan, is you don't have an answer for us.

Fact: DHHS has more money going out than coming in. How do we fund the shortfall Dan??

rdarluv's picture
verified

So what you're saying Dan, is

So what you're saying Dan, is you don't have an answer for us.

Fact: DHHS has more money going out than coming in. How do we fund the shortfall Dan??

tron's picture

no matter how many times you

no matter how many times you state it, it still isn't the truth. I have a solution, stop the massive tax cuts the republicans gave to the rich, which this year would result in having NO deficit in the DHHS budget. GET IT??? The 'deficit' is DIRECTLY a result from that massive tax cut.

rdarluv's picture
verified

LOL....you're losing it Dan.

LOL....you're losing it Dan. Those tax cuts weren't big enough to account for 120 million by themselves and DHHS had its budget problems long before any tax cuts and you know it.

Still no link to the data you use huh? No real answer from Dan Breton?

hawaiian's picture
verified

Mark , 11.12.19 22:22 hst

Mark , 11.12.19 22:22 hst *
Dumb question : " From whom and where do your receive your health care ? "
/s Dr. Dosh , Hawai'i •
http://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com/
~ Merry Christmas ~

rdarluv's picture
verified

Yes, I agree. That is a dumb

Yes, I agree. That is a dumb question......you will now try to imply that because I do not receive any government insurance that it doesn't effect me. The better question would be: "Do these cuts affect me?" and my answer is yes. They affect half of my household income.

I have a question for you; Where or how does the occupy movement come up with 99%?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gIxuOabGBE
~ Merry Christmas ~

rdarluv's picture
verified

Maybe, Dr. Dosh, you could

Maybe, Dr. Dosh, you could answer the questions I asked of Dianne? How would you suggest we cover the DHHS shortfall? Which programs should be cut instead, or which programs should we take from to cover the DHHS shortfall?

Advertisement