D. Relph: Nurturing partnerships

I'm sick and tired of the jabberwocky that comes from the debate about gay marriage. One side says that God intended for a marriage to be between one man and one woman. The other side says that they have equal rights and should have the right to be married.

They are both wrong.

The First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” If a law passes permitting gay marriage, it will be in conflict with those people whose religion prohibits gay marriage. If a law isn't passed empowering gay marriage, then gays will claim their rights are being violated.

Let’s get to the point. Marriage is a sacrament of the churches in their communities.

All laws governing marriage should be thrown out. Let the churches marry whom they please and the state should have nothing to say about it.

The state should be responsible for the product of the marriages — the children. Seeing to the welfare of the children is the state’s responsibility.

The state should ensure that the children are secured in loving and caring homes. Laws concerning these children should be kept and the state should ensure that lasting partnerships exist that keep these children safe.

The state should pass laws governing the partnership of the parents, but should not be concerned with the sex of the partners. These partnerships are what should be legally recognized and the state should nurture these partnerships.

Daniel C. Relph, Lewiston

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

marcjal's picture
verified

And here is more.....

Daniel I certainly agree with most of what you say concerning the validity of marriage. I, like you, do not feel that it should be a political issue. Leave it to the religions and to those who wish to marry. If your religion doesn’t allow whatever; people seek a JP all the time. There shouldn’t be need for a law to allow for whom it should happen.

The civil side of marriage to me is simply a means of record keeping and validation of who is married to whom. Whether the couple should or shouldn’t be is not for the state or anyone else to decide.

As to your assertion that the state is responsible for the products of marriage, the children, I believe your attitude is too general. The state certainly can and usually will intervene when the situation presents itself that the children are physically or mentally at risk, and has a duty to do so. To generalize and just make the statement that it’s the states’ responsibility is in my view inaccurate.

veritas's picture
verified

"The state should be responsible

for the product of the marriages - the Children."

"The state should ensure that the children are secured in loving and caring homes. Laws concerning these children should be kept and the state should ensure that lasting partnerships exist that keep these children safe."

We will see to that... - And no Homosexuals will dare raise you, as we have plans for them!

Lil's picture
verified

except...

Marriage is a civil contract - absolutely no church required! Another constitutional scholar. "If a law passes permitting gay marriage, it will be in conflict with those people whose religion prohibits gay marriage." Not if they don't get gay married!

Rev Jim's picture
verified

"The State should

be responsible for the product of the marriages---the children. Seeing to the welfare of the children is the state's responsibility."Are you kidding me ? No wonder this state has such a problem with it's "balance sheet". With voters with this mentality refusing to take their own responsibility for their own decisions/actions and putting the burden on the rest of us. The state has no such responsibility!!!!

sweetfern's picture
verified

WOW! I beat Bretton this morning.

If marriage is only "a sacrament of the churches in their communities" why do you have to go to city hall for a marriage license?
I'm confused.

Pirate's picture
verified

Good shot, Al. You're aim's

Good shot, Al. You're aim's improving every day.

Advertisement