Marilyn Burgess of Leeds recently wrote (Jan. 13) that asked if, in these difficult times, “legislators also were willing to share the misery?”
I am pleased to report when control of the Legislature changed hands in 2010, the new leadership immediately took steps to demonstrate that we are all in this together.
Mindful that we needed to lead by example, we cut the Legislature's budget by nearly $8 million for the biennium. This was the largest reduction from a previous year in the history of the Maine Legislature. We also pledged that the same budget initiatives that affect state workers will also apply to legislators.
Cuts that apply to state legislators include: a pay freeze, pension changes, health insurance cuts, suspended cost of living increases, and a 30 percent reduction in out-of-state travel.
We felt it was important to make those changes before addressing the difficult state budget, pension, health insurance, regulatory fairness, tax cuts, welfare system and good government reforms that we adopted.
We are now in the process of working with the ethics commission to address one of the other issues mentioned by Ms. Burgess — the need to close the legislative reporting loophole.
I can’t address what the U.S. Congress is doing in that area, but I am pleased to report that the Maine Legislature recognizes the need to restore public trust and to make difficult changes that will benefit all of us going forward.
We are all in this together.
Sen. Garrett P. Mason, R-Lisbon Falls

Who is really paying what???
Rep Mason said "Mindful that we needed to lead by example, we cut the Legislature's budget by nearly $8 million for the biennium" Now are you just talking about the 35 Senators and 151 Rep's, I think not.
these cuts came out of the pockets of many hard working public employees.
Would Rep. Mason please provide how much money just the 35 Senators and 151 Representatives were cut out of the $8 million.
You see many people think that cutting the Legislative budget is just the Senators and Representatives and that the total of 186 Rep's and Sen's gave up $ 8 million. and this is far from the story.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Good start Sen Mason,
Now, how about meeting once every two years, that should produce quite a savings. Less time in session = more money not wasted on useless bills.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (2)
Agree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.So Sen. Mason, did you cut
So Sen. Mason, did you cut your salary and per Diem allowances? Did you cut back your generous health care plan, eliminate your pension? Or did you just require other people sacrifice, which is what you guys usually do. You took millions of dollars out of the current state budget to give your financial backers a huge tax cut, now you're expecting the poorest of the poor to pay for it. Just don't break your arm patting yourself on the back, the elderly and the poor will have to foot the bill to pay for it.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (9)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.