Voters in Greene pass smaller budget

Amber Waterman/Sun Journal

Glenn Chateauvert and other Greene residents vote on an article during Saturday's town meeting at Greene Central School. Chateauvert is the president of the Greene Youth Athletic Association.

GREENE — Voters at town meeting Saturday agreed to spend less this year than last on local government and services, but taxpayers won't know the full burden until the school budget is set.

Amber Waterman/Sun Journal

Brenda Theriault speaks to the importance of charitable giving during the Greene town meeting Saturday. Townspeople were preparing to vote on an article to fund the Charitable Expense Account for the ensuing year.

Amber Waterman/Sun Journal

Nancy Bisesti, right, looks to her husband, Jim, and daughter Brianna as they decline to vote in favor of an article during the Greene town meeting Saturday.

Townspeople approved a spending plan of $1.2 million, about $36,000 less than the amount raised for 2012. But that amount does not include school taxes.

Town Manager Charles A. Noonan told the 100 or so townspeople at the Greene Central School gymnasium that a lack of school budget figures made it difficult to come up with a final budget.

“Not having that school budget is a tremendous detriment to making decisions,” Noonan said.

There was brief discussion of moving the annual meeting date to early summer when the school funding figures would be known. It was agreed that town officials would look into a change, but it would not be possible to accomplish such rescheduling for about two years.

Townspeople spent more than half an hour on an article to provide a discount for early tax payments. Selectmen had recommended a 5 percent discount and the Budget Committee had proposed 1 percent. Voters shot down the discount altogether.

The new municipal budget includes:

* A significant increase in dispatch services in the Fire Protection Expense Account, from $8,775 to $22,375. Noonan said higher Androscoggin County fees were responsible for the jump.

* A Public Works Road Maintenance Expense Account appropriation of $484,170, including $350,000 (an increase of $25,000 over 2012) for road construction and paving. Noonan said an increase in the cost of asphalt was the principal reason.

Residents asked if additional pavement overlay would be done on College Road, which received pavement last year. Noonan said it might be a couple of years before that happens. Someone asked if Meadow Hill Road would get attention. A resident suggested that cutting back some brush would improve safety, and town officials agreed to have crews do that.

* A total of $7,350 for 10 charitable organizations, as recommended by selectmen. The Budget Committee had recommended giving the groups no money. However,  Budget Committee member Brenda Theriault urged approval.

She said the request “doesn’t amount to one stop at the coffee shop for you on your tax bill.”

Rural Community Action Ministry asked for $5,500, which was the highest among the 10 requests. Noonan said he has seen the work done in Greene by RCAM and he praised its effectiveness.

In other action, Noonan said an article calling for enactment of a “Flood Plain Management Ordinance for the Town of Greene” would have “really no effect whatsoever” on the town. He said it’s a yearly process to examine the floodplain maps, and there had been no changes since last year. Voters agreed to the enactment as requested.

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

Bob McQueeney's picture
verified

Charitable contributions????

$7,350.00 is being forceably taken from town residents, and just given away to charity, and it's called charity to the town tax payers???? This is not town business. It absolutely should not be forced upon anyone. I doubt that every single taxpayer in town wanted to or was able to support each charity funded with taxpayer money.

4076 people live in Greene, and if you account for the unemployed and children in town, it's about half of that for property taxpayers, give or take, so it adds $4.00 to every taxpayer's bill. But the amount doesn't matter. Charity is free and willing giving, with the giver deciding for themselves if they want to support a certain charity and in what amount.

I am not against supporting charities, and do so myself. I research the overhead of those charities and make sure I want to support them. I can not support all those I wish to, but I freely do what I can. If Brenda Theriault is so passionate about supporting such charities, she is free to do so with her own purse. But to "legally" force everyone in town to support a charity????? Is this even legal?

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...