A U.S. Predator drone flies over Kandahar Air Field in southern Afghanistan on Jan. 31. State Sen. John Patrick, D-Rumford, says he wants limits on how drones, which are unmanned aerial vehicles, are used by law enforcement in Maine.
AUGUSTA — A state senator said Tuesday he wants limits and restrictions on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by police and other law-enforcement agencies in Maine.
Sen. John Patrick, D-Rumford, has authored a bill that would limit the use of drone-like surveillance devices and require police to seek a warrant from the courts before deploying them.
"I've always had a problem with giving Big Brother more tools to look at the masses," Patrick said. "I really don't like the idea of just anyone being able to watch everyone for anything."
Patrick said he consulted Oxford County Sheriff Wayne Gallant on the measure and Gallant advised him that it wouldn't be a good idea to take certain tools from law enforcement.
The U.S. Congressional Research Service in January issued a report titled "Integration of Drones into Domestic Airspace." The report details select legal issues with using unmanned aerial vehicles on civilians. In its conclusion, the report states that many legal issues surrounding the use of drones on the domestic population will remain unresolved until there is more "widespread" use of the vehicles.
The report also suggests the vehicles would be regulated under the Federal Aviation Administration and that any federal law on the domestic deployment of drones in the national airspace may, based on previous U.S. Supreme Court rulings, pre-empt state law.
Patrick said his bill allows for the use of drones in certain circumstances but prohibits the use for "general surveillance." The bill also prohibits the use of facial recognition or biometric software on any drone operated by law enforcement in Maine.
"Maine's Vacationland," Patrick said. "Can you imagine some drone is flying over the beaches of Maine, people look up and a mile up in the sky there's just a thing flying around looking at beaches? Who knows what the information would be used for if they did it for the sake of general surveillance."
The bill also prohibits gathering information not related to a permitted use.
It allows the use of the vehicles with consent, with a court-order search warrant and in emergencies in which there is an imminent threat to a person's life.
"If there's a reason, if you need a warrant, or you are going after a bad guy or if there happens to be a terrorist or something, then you can do these things," Patrick said. "But just generally flying over and scoping everyone for no reason ... "
He said he sponsored the bill so the Legislature could be proactive, rather than reactive.
"It's going to give us a chance to discuss this openly; we haven't had that dialogue," he said.
Patrick's bill moved Tuesday from the Senate to the Legislature's Judiciary Committee for hearings and discussion.


Measure looks to limit the use of drones for monitoring ME
Mainers ? 19:45 hst Tuesday
This is nutty . It's not a problem and won't be
We rather - d o u b t - that police will be flying drones around spying on people bathing naked in their back yards smoking pot
In fact , kids have been putting cameras in model airplanes and model rockets for years & years now Binoculars ? Yeah . That's what electric meter readers use
How about unlicensed hang gliders and ultra lights ?
Paul Cyr of http://www.crownofmaine.com/paulcyr/ takes some great shots in ME and la Canada along the St. John , straddling the National borders . Who - k n o w s - what he sees
Low flying F-16s from the VT National Guard is your problem , not drones . Have them practice over Lake Champaign ( sic.) or the Atlantic Ocean and not NH & ME
Concentrate on something more important
/s , Steve and some other http://www.ama.org members
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.good information
This seems like a reasonable discussion .
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.