Maine mother of 13 admits hiring hitman to kill husband, to serve 120 days

Judy Harrison/Bangor Daily News

Wendy Farley, 48, of Brownville and her attorney Peter Rodway of Portland wait for her trial to begin at the Piscataquis County Courthouse in Dover-Foxcroft in March 2014.

DOVER-FOXCROFT — A Brownville woman whose March trial ended when the jury deadlocked admitted Monday in Piscataquis County Superior Court that she tried to hire a hitman to kill her husband nearly two years ago.

Wendy Farley, 48, was sentenced by Superior Court Justice William Anderson to 10 years in prison with all but 120 days suspended. Her plea agreement with District Attorney R. Christopher Almy also requires her to serve two years of probation.

Conditions of her probation include psychological counseling and no contact with the man she tried to hire to find someone to kill her husband and make it look like a hunting accident. She is not prohibited from having contact with her husband.

Farley pleaded guilty to one count of criminal solicitation, a Class A crime.

She entered what is called an Alford plea. This type of plea — named for the U.S. Supreme Court case North Carolina v. Alford, decided in 1970 — is “a guilty plea that a defendant enters as part of a plea bargain, without actually admitting guilt,” according to Black’s Law Dictionary.

By pleading guilty, Farley admitted that if there were another trial, a jury could find that she tried to a hire a hitman, through Michael Anderson, 51, of Milo, in September 2012 to kill her husband.

Anderson testified at Farley’s trial that he went to the police, who helped him tape a conversation with her about how she wanted the job done.

If she had been retried and found guilty, Farley faced up to 30 years in prison and a fine of up to $50,000. The 60 days she was jailed in fall 2012 before posting a $10,000 cash bail, will count toward the 120 days she must serve in the Piscataquis County jail, according to Farley’s attorney Peter Rodway of Portland.

The defendant’s husband of nearly 30 years testified at his wife’s trial for the defense that he reacted with “shock, surprise and disbelief” when his wife was arrested for trying to hire a hitman to kill him.

He described her as a good wife and the mother of the couple’s 13 children, then ages 7 to 28.

Luther Farley said the couple tried to live a self-sustaining lifestyle. They grew their own food, kept chickens, pigs, and cows for beef and milk. Farley said that his wife cared for the children and home-schooled them. He said that she took care of the chores inside the home, and he did much of the work outside.

Luther Farley testified that their eldest child, Caleb Farley, 28, suffered a traumatic brain injury on Jan. 20, 2012, when he crashed his truck on Interstate 95. Farley said their son was in intensive care at Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor for three weeks and in the hospital’s rehabilitation center until March of that year.

Wendy Farley was at EMMC almost constantly when their son was in ICU and three days each week while he was in rehab. Luther Farley testified that in the summer of 2012, his wife seemed to change. She began chewing on her hair and sleeping during the day.

“I thought things were good,” he said when asked to assess his marriage.

Anderson testified in March that Wendy Farley approached him about finding someone to kill her husband. With the help of local police, Anderson recorded a Sept. 18, 2012, conversation he had on his back porch with her while the recording device was hidden in his work boot.

The 39-minute recording was played Thursday for the jury. Almy and Rodway played snippets of the conversation in their closings.

“Nothing fancy, nothing stupid, nothing traceable,” Farley said on the recording. “Once it’s done, I don’t want someone coming back at me wanting more money.”

Anderson testified that Farley was specific about what she wanted, including the weapon — a .30-.30 rifle — that should be used.

“One shot, drop him,” she said on the recording played for jurors. “Don’t go back for a second shot. That doesn’t look like a hunting accident.”

Wendy Farley did not take the stand in her own defense.

The jury of 10 women and two men deliberated for more than six hours before the judge declared a mistrial.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.




Wendy--A divorce would have

Wendy--A divorce would have been especially if the "hit" had been successful.


Mea culpa--Should have said

Mea culpa--Should have said "Wendy--a divorce would have been less of a risk for you, especially if the "hit" had been successful.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

As is so often the case, poor

As is so often the case, poor old Luther probably never saw any of this coming.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...