An evaluation of public benefits, private insurance

Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services is facing a $120 million deficit, a gaping and largely unanticipated financial hole that must be filled if taxpayers hope to avoid funding yet another supplemental budget for this agency.

According to DHHS Commissioner Mary Mayhew, the agency is now going through a thorough review to restructure and streamline delivery of services. It’s a review that, according to Mayhew, will create efficiencies and trim waste.

Good.

However, the review is not close to complete and its result is unknown. And, the simple reality is that adjustments to program administration will not come close to meeting the budget deficit. The department will have to cut programs and services, and it will start by whittling Medicaid.

Mayhew said one of the guidelines will be to measure Maine’s benefit package against what is required by federal law. Maine’s benefits exceed those requirements, a situation created over a period of years as in-state programs and services were expanded and eligibility guidelines were adjusted.

For instance, in 2002, DHHS added a new class of Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults who do not have children; 2,846 clients immediately enrolled for benefits.

Four months later, that number had jumped to 10,036 and has consistently remained between 10,000 and 22,000 each month since. In October, there were 18,819 adults receiving service, which is about 5 percent of all Medicaid clients.

According to Gov. Paul LePage, that program now costs Maine taxpayers something close to $20 million a year.

Using that spending estimate, Mainers pay $1.6 million a month to insure these childless adults, or close to $89 per person each month, which is a pretty reasonable cost for medical coverage.

On Monday, the Associated Press reported that Gov. LePage is expected to announce that, as part of his plan to resolve the DHHS deficit, Medicaid services for these low-income adults will end.

In talking about that possibility last week, Mayhew said that she hoped these adults would pursue individual medical insurance policies to maintain continuity of coverage. But, that is unlikely. These adults qualify for Medicaid because they are already living on the financial edge, and to think that they would have the cash to pay premiums for private insurance is just not realistic.

The more likely scenario is that these uninsured adults will seek medical care at the most expensive sites — our state’s emergency rooms. And, without the ability to pay, the cost of their care will be pushed off on businesses and the privately insured.

So, Maine people are going to pay for their care anyway.

What may also happen is that these adults who would no longer qualify for care as individuals may consider having children in order to qualify for family coverage, bringing the burden for the parent and child’s combined care back to DHHS.

Cutting an entire class of Medicaid clients to help meet the budget deficit might make sense on a balance sheet, there is no real savings because those costs will just be loaded on taxpayers  and insurance rate payers in another form.

In addition to aligning state benefits with federal requirements, another measure DHHS may consider in trimming services is comparing public services to those offered under private insurance.

One example is that Medicaid pays for transportation to medical appointments. Private insurance does not, and those patients are expected to get themselves to their appointments and are entitled to claim mileage credit on their income tax returns. Shouldn’t Medicaid patients do the same?

Just because insurance is publicly funded does not mean it should be more extravagant than available in the private sector. Right?

While we appreciate and support the governor’s position to trim DHHS instead of grabbing funding from other agencies to resolve the DHHS deficit, it just doesn’t make sense to eliminate an entire class of Medicaid clients and set them adrift to fend for their own medical care when the end result will not create any real savings.

Instead, we need sensible, surgical cuts across the agency’s entire roster of services and then focused attention paid to controlling costs, quashing fraud and protecting the public’s money.

jmeyer@sunjournal.com

The opinions expressed in this column reflect the views of the ownership and editorial board.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

J. McKane's picture
verified

"Instead, we need sensible,

"Instead, we need sensible, surgical cuts across the agency’s entire roster of services and then focused attention paid to controlling costs, quashing fraud and protecting the public’s money."

Sounds easy. It's not. Major cuts have to be made. It's too bad this paper doesn't get it.

This editorial is just a re-hash of the Democrats talking points.

Claire2323's picture
verified

Numbers do lie

I don't know why anyone would take these numbers at face value. In this administration you start with an opinion or an anonymous email and then you bend the fact to match your predetermined conclusion. We are not given any detailed information on where the shortfall is coming from just a number pulled out of the air. It would be nice to get a factual audit from an independent source.

hawaiian's picture
verified

New , 6 pm in Hawai'i

New , 6 pm in Hawai'i 11.12.06
Figures don't lie . Liars go figure . Right or wrong , it's a starting point for discussion
" Mainers pay $1.6 million a month to insure these childless adults, or close to $89 per person each month, which is a pretty reasonable cost for medical coverage. " In fact , it is - very - resonable . You are correct LSJ ® √
Do we know who these people are , everyone ? They are seniors ( your parents and grandparents ) . Does anyone really want to pull the rug from beneath their grandmother or mom ?
In the spirit of the season , Melé Kalikimaka , Steve Dosh :)

hawaiian's picture
verified

An evaluation of public benefits, private insurance

. .l o l √ 11.12.06 10:30 am ish
. .SsSssShsshh . .
" Let's privatize social security . " Bush II
Ho Hho hoOO•º *<;Q~ /s, Steve Dosh , | North Pole | 

Xavier90's picture
verified

And next,,,,,

Since Mr LePage is proposing that tax payer funded health insurance be cut for all childless adults, I would suggest that his be cut also. His children are adults and responsible for their own. he and his wife certainly have enough salary and perks. Cut cut cut Paul,,,, till it hurts!

Robert61's picture

I wasn aware the governor was

I wasn aware the governor was covered by Mainecare which is where these cuts and changes are occurring..and our governor salary & benefit package is pathetic compared to other executivesd and even other governors.

tron's picture

nice try, but unfortunately

nice try, but unfortunately his salary and perks cannot be cut during his term.

tron's picture

Wow, whoever disagreed is

Wow, whoever disagreed is truly ignorant, it's the law.

Gary52's picture
verified

Part of the problem has to be

Part of the problem has to be that Governor Lepage paid a ton of money owed Medicaid providers like hospitals that the Baldacci administration chose to "defer". Whether we provide services we don't have the money for or whether we eliminate those services, in the end, it's still the same working taxpayers and businesses that foot the bill. First and foremost, we have to fix a broken system that gives little to no incentive for people to get ahead a bit in life. If someone chooses to not get an adequate education, then they don't have to work the rest of their lives at a menial job, we, the taxpayers, will buy them food, pay their rent, pay their medical expenses, heck, we'll even buy them oil or give them money to pay for other heating sources. I firmly believe this is why Maine and the Country as a whole are in such a financial squeeze. The only thing that seperates many people from the welfare class is pride, and apparently, there isn't enough of that to go around. We have to take care of our elderly and those that are incapable of taking care of themselves, such as those with physical or mental handicaps and children, but I can not be convinced that I have to pay for the health care of apparently healthy people who are too lazy to work and at the same time, help pay for a "debit card" that allows them to buy a sanwich, soda, and a bag of chips at the corner store because they don't have time to cook at home in their cozy little subsidized apartments. That's my rant for the day, now I have to get down to work.

tron's picture

The overwhelming majority of

The overwhelming majority of the money 'paid' to the hospitals was stimulus money, you know, the law that lepage despises.

Jason's picture
verified

Fairy tales are nice...

I'll cut right to it. There is no lazy attribute your can just check. The forms don't ask "Are you a lazy bum looking for a handout?". If there was a way of doing this easily, it would have been done. But as you acknowledged, there are people who need it and should get it. And separating them from "lazy" people is not easy.

To be honest, there should be a baseline of insurance like Medicare. Then let people customize it like Medicare(medicare advantage, supplimental, ect..). That would reduce costs and I bet would be cheaper than how we are doing it now.

Rev Jim's picture
verified

Problem

location is "Right On". Good rant there Mr. Savard, I envy you as I miss going to work in my old meaningful and rewarding job. We do have a "SPENDING PROBLEM" not a revenue problem!!

tron's picture

Does anyone else notice that

Does anyone else notice that this 'mysterious' deficit in the DHHS budget is roughly equal to the massive tax cut to the wealthiest individuals during the last session? Including the elimination of taxes paid on private airplanes and maintenance? To most reasonable people it appears these 'deficits' were deliberate under budgeting, for the express purpose of penalizing the poor at the expense of the wealthiest of our state. Republicans should be ashamed.

Advertisement