Dixfield board updated on proposed wind project

DIXFIELD — Selectmen are waiting for an opinion from Brunswick lawyer Kristen Collins on the legality of a proposed wind ordinance that voters are scheduled to act on during the Nov. 6 elections.

Other input has been provided by Androscoggin Valley Council of Government's planner John Maloney, who said that the ordinance, as it is written, is aligned with the town's land-use policies.

The ordinance, as written, provides regulations for constructing a wind project that Patriot Renewables LLC, of Boston, said it could work with.

Some in town, including Selectmen Hart Daley and Scott Belskis, want a tougher ordinance that would essentially ban such construction.

As it stands now, if a majority of residents approve the existing proposed ordinance, they are approving construction of the project. If they vote it down, Town Manager Eugene Skibitsky said the project is dead.

Board Chairman Mac Gill said once Collins provides her review of the proposed ordinance, selectmen will meet with Maloney and Collins to discuss it.

Patriot Renewables has been conducting wind tests, bird studies and other research on the Colonel Holman Mountain ridgeline for several years as preliminary work needed for the $40 million project. In that time, a similar project has been constructed in Woodstock, and two others, in Canton and Carthage, are going through the approval process.

Tentatively planned is a network of wind turbines that would feed into a substation in Canton.

Skibitsky said that if Dixfield residents ultimately turn down wind turbine construction, the town would still be touched by them because transmission lines would be built within the boundaries of the town.

Tom Carroll, project manager for the Dixfield project, appeared before the board Monday night to provide an update on several questions previously posed by Daley and Belskis.

Among them was a request for the company's wind data has been collected from the Colonel Holman ridgeline during the past couple of years.

This is proprietary information and part of negotiations (for the sale of the power),” Carroll told the board.

Daley said that means that until the wind towers are erected, Dixfield residents won't know if wind is viable.

We have to take the company's word for it and give you the green light,” Daley said.

Carroll responded with, “The fact that I'm building the project shows it's viable. We need a 10-, 15- or 20-year agreement with someone who will be purchasing the power. We don't release that information. If they choose to release it, that's up to them.”

When asked who was considering the purchase of the power, Carroll said a consortium of towns from Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

Daley also questioned the comparative price of electricity generated by wind and other forms of energy.

Carroll said land wind power may be 2 to 3 cents higher. Ocean wind power would be much higher. He said, too, that when the purchase/price agreement is signed with the buyers, the rate will remain the same for the length of the agreement.

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

macmac's picture
verified

Property and sound impacts

Property and sound impacts are known to reach out a distance of 2 kilometers from industrial sized wind turbines. This means one fifth the area of Dixfield will essentially be under influence of the wind project. The wind project consists of massive machinery which will lose value over time, just like your vehicles, and consequently the town loses tax revenue from them over time, while they continue to depress values over one fifth of the town.
Much of the revenue from taxation on these projects end up as funding for the school district, because as the town's value increases, the proportion of the town's obligation to the school district rises.
Tax revenue from multi-million dollar wind projects also causes the county tax paid by the town to rise.
The State lowers sharing revenues to a town as it's overall value increases.
The State Department of Education also lowers sharing revenues to the school district as a town's value increases the overall district area.
Economically, industrial wind projects have negative monetary impacts to your town's taxpayers.

Karen Pease's picture
verified

Erring on the side of caution

"In that time, a similar project has been constructed in Woodstock, and two others, in Canton and Carthage, are going through the approval process."

What this article doesn't state is that Patriot Renewables' Carthage project's permit has been appealed by Friends of Maine's Mountains and by private citizens who stand to be negatively impacted by the proposed industrial wind development, which will be built on Saddleback Mountain, right next door to Mt. Blue State Park.

I encourage residents to learn the facts about these projects and to speak with their neighbors who've already been through this process. There's not a single wind development in Maine which hasn't resulted in serious complaints and/or litigation after the industrial facilities were commissioned. It's vital that we learn from others' experiences-- or else we'll continue to repeat the same mistakes--all the while sacrificing the health and 'quaility of life' of Mainers...and this state's unique and unequalled "Quality of Place". There are no 'do-overs'. It's vital we err on the side of caution. It's easier to make an ordinance less restrictive in the future than it is to tighten restrictions once a project is built.

Respectfully,
Karen Pease
Lexington Twp., Maine

penny gray's picture
verified

Wow. Voters, you should know

Wow. Voters, you should know what you're dealing with. "Proprietary information" on the quality of wind that PR collects: their met tower on Saddleback Mountain was collapsed in a heap for months yet they told us the average wind speed being collected was 45 miles an hour, better than anything off the coast or on the windy midwest plains. (This delivery at the Carthage meeting actually caused an outbreak of laughter among the residents.) We were being told that Saddleback was the Saudi Arabia of wind!!!! Then they told us that no birds were using the ridgelines to migrate along or hunt on, according to THEIR data. The USIF&W repudiated their data by stating that this was a critical flyway for migratory birds and endangered raptors. Of course we Carthage folk already knew that because we see the birds flying over every spring and fall. PR will build this project because they want the grants, the tax write-offs, the REC's, and all the other taxpayer $$$$ that will go into their bank account, NOT because it's going to "power all the home in Maine" or save the planet from spontaneous combustion or "wean us off of foreign oil". As for the initial impact of lowering property taxes, be aware of the accelerated tax depreciation on these projects. Research what has already happened in Freedom with this same company. Just because they built a big tunnel in Boston (remember the Big Dig?) doesn't mean they're any good at building monstrous towers atop our mountains. Do we really want to be owned by them?

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...