AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Leaders of a coalition that's pushing for a referendum to mandate increased use of renewable energy in Maine said Wednesday their initiative would reduce dependence on foreign oil while lowering residential energy bills.
Maine Citizens for Clean Energy leaders also said they're confident they'll collect more than 57,000 valid signatures needed by the end of January to get their question on next November's referendum ballot.
The coalition, which includes businesses, environmental organizations and individuals, faces opposition from Republican Gov. Paul LePage, who says predictions of lower energy costs are wrong and promises to fight the initiative.
The Maine Citizens' referendum proposal would require that at least 20 percent of Maine's electricity come from renewable energy sources, such as wind, tidal and solar, by 2020, and require utilities to invest in energy efficiency whenever it would reduce energy costs for ratepayers.
An economic analysis of the proposal conducted by the nonprofit research and advocacy group Environment Northeast concludes that ratepayers would pay more at first, but gradually save money if the referendum passes. Under different scenarios analyzed by ENE, residential bills would rise by less than $1 per month within the next couple of years before dropping by at least 34 cents per month, or as much as $8.70 per month, by 2030.
"We are lagging states surrounding us and provinces in Canada on the amount of money that we're investing in energy efficiency," said Environment Northeast's Maine Director, Beth Nagusky, who is also a former state environmental protection commissioner.
"We have tremendous potential to grow the production and use of our own indigenous renewable energy resources as well, and we can do so in a way that makes sense for the ratepayers, for our economy, for public health and that protects clean air and clean water," said Nagusky, who stood in front of four safety-vested construction employees of Reed & Reed, which is actively involved in windmill projects in Maine and other states.
The Woolwich-based company's Abbie Parker said the renewable energy initiative is good for business.
"If Maine wants to see significant improvement on energy costs while keeping jobs and energy dollars local, it's time for the state to diversify the way it creates electricity," said Parker.
The governor vows a vigorous fight against the proposal, saying he opposes government mandates and believes in allowing the free market to determine which generation and energy sources are the most cost competitive. LePage also disagrees with the coalition's contention that consumers would realize savings and says it would result in increased energy costs.




Maine Citizens for clean energy
Maine Citizens for clean energy have taken the initiative and want to force Maine to use 20% renewable energy by the year 2020, just 8 years from now. I gotta say, I would like to see that.
But I have a few questions, as any person should. This coalition, having taken the initiative, should have a plan to succeed. Can they lay out their plan for all to see, please? Have they put together a solid and complete plan, outlining how this initiative will be implemented? Does their plan shows a timeline and realistic expected costs, research and development, as well as dealing with the NIMBY factors?
What can (and does happen) is that as the deadline gets closer, and the target is not close to being met, expensive methods need to be implemented to meet that target, because this was passed into law and we must meet the target. We need a realistic, attainable goal, and we need to see their plan to do so.
Why am I wondering if this coalition even has a solid plan? Why do I think that they are just trying to get the mandate in place, cost and consequences be damned? I have yet to see anything of their plan.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.good move
Renewable energy is the only way Maine will be able to lower their cost of energy. Which by the way is not that bad when you compare to other states that are locked out of the highly tax subsidized coal and hydro markets. We have lower electric costs than any other state in New England, and being rural have greater access to use of wood.
The governors plan to ramp up the use of natural gas is ill advised, much like oil it is a fossil fuel and it's use releases sequestered carbon into the atmosphere. It's cost is rising, and will continue to rise as extraction methods get more complicated and expensive. True renewable energy, wind, tidal, solar, bio mass and yes wood will lower Maine's cost, carbon footprint, and unemployment rate.
How is it that the head of our state can't see that? Or is someone else pushing the buttons?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.