Our View
A spin on the bottled
Is bottled water a "scam?" If so, we're all suckers.
Scam is the word used by the Boston Globe columnist Derrick Z. Jackson, who wrote Tuesday about the declining thirst for bottled water. The recession has sent water sales southward. Nestle, which owns Poland Spring here in Maine, has said its sales are off 5 percent
Jackson's premise is that buying bottled water is akin to P.T. Barnum's famous signs saying "This Way To The Egress," which bamboozled gullible customers into believing they were heading toward some fanciful attraction. (Nope, just the exit.)
There are many valid criticisms of bottled water. Some bottlers have failed to disclose their water sources, which kept consumers from knowing the difference between Maine spring water, for example, and water sucked from municipal supplies. People should know what they're buying.
Bottlers have also not done enough, until recently, to address the environmental effects of bottles; too many still end up landfilled. Addressing this problem, however, requires action by both bottlers and government, to promote recycling bottles before they become trash.
More than 90 percent of beverage containers in Maine are returned for a nickel deposit, for instance, which helps neutralize concerns about bottles just sitting in landfills for millennial as rubbish. If this system works here, it could work just as well in other states.
So there are solutions, and mitigations, to concerns about bottled water. Calling it a scam, though, runs against history. Water from Poland Spring was first sold commercially in 1859, after Hiram Ricker drank from it daily and declared himself cured of chronic indigestion.
That probably was a stretch. But bottled water still filled a niche, when public water systems were either nonexistent or flimsy, and lacking any of the rigorous cleanliness standards of today. Before passing judgment on the modern bottling industry, it should be remembered safe, potable water was — at one point — a rare commodity, which gave it value.
What's happened since is public water, with the development of new filtration technology (such as the slick $7.7 million ultraviolet water filtering plant being built on Lake Auburn), now provides reliably safe water. It's gotten so good, in fact, that municipal water is now being bottled and sold — the ultimate compliment.
This advent doesn't now make all bottled water a scam. Instead, it makes it an option. Consumers buy bottles for practical reasons like convenience, portability and taste, or, admittedly, for questionable reasons like better health, a sentiment lingering since Ricker's time.
Whether these are the wisest choices, for the budget or the environment, are open for debate. The argument seems pretty simple: if you want bottled water, buy it. If you don't, don't.
Thankfully, unlike bygone days, we now have that choice.
Advertisement
Displaying comments, from newest to oldest
So glad to hear that bottled
So glad to hear that bottled water is not a scam, and that in fact bottled water has been in use since at least 1859 when Hiram Ricker claimed Poland Spring water had medicinal value; a claim most would call a... scam.
I personally think most tap
I personally think most tap water tastes gross. Don't know if the writer is from Boston, but their water is REALLY yucky.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Most Popular Today
verified on "Peru committee considers wind turbine noise levels"
sound
I noticed on 3 sound modeling maps provided to the DEP and LURC from the developer a trend.
The trend is a range of 35-45 dBa with-in a mile from turbine centers.
If we rural people are used to 20 dBa what will 42 dBa sound like?
On the decibel scale, doubling the intensity corresponds to an increase of 3 dB.
This does not correspond to a perceived doubling of loudness, however. We perceive loudness to be doubled when the intensity increases by a factor of 10! This corresponds to a 10 dB increase.
A change by 1 dB is about the smallest change a human being can detect.
verified on "D. Corrigan: Contesting benefits of wind power"
The Hidden Factors
Woodstock Site Plan Review
Page 15 , Number 18
Noise: the proposed development shall not raise noise levels to the extent that abutting and/or nearby residents are adversely affect.
A) The maximum permissible sound pressure level of any continuous, regular or frequent or an intermittent source of sound produced by any activity shall be limited by the time period and land use which it abuts listed below. Sound levels shall be measured at 4 feet above the ground at the property boundary of the source.
Sound pressure level limits using the sound equivalent level of one hour (leq 60 measured in dB(a) scale)
7:00 am to 10:00pm, residential 55 dB(a)
10:00pm to 7:00am residential 45 dB(a)
B) Noise shall be measured by a meter set on the A-weight response scale, fast response. The meter shall meet the American National Standards (ANSA SI-4-1961) American standard specification for general purpose sound meters.
My name is Leola Ballweber, I live in Woodstock, Maine. The town of Woodstock Planning board used the DEP guide lines for sound, yet, approved a waiver to raise the sound levels.
The wind project was appealed at the town level, DEP level, which Warren Brown suggested a NRO for 3 turbines starting at 7pm and adding 3 more from 10pm till 7am, 6 of 10 turbines would be restricted during this time and then it was off to the BEP. After the Supreme Court case was dropped, only 20% chance in the citizen’s favor. Patriot Renewable petitioned for the NRO to be removed. My understanding is that it was granted and the NRO was removed.
What was learned was that the state does not have regulations in place to protect the citizens from the unique infra-sound projected by industrial wind turbines.
The science is there to prove it exists, yet it is the citizens who are left to protect themselves.
The wind industry does and will not admit that these machines on top of Maine’s mountains make noise.
The sound maps that are computer generated are flawed and incorrect in these projects.
Bayroot, LLC owns land that is part of the Spruce Mount Wind Project, leases were giving. As soon as the Spruce mountain wind project began construction, Bayroot, LLC began removing timber between abutting properties and the wind project. If, the abutters had taken some consolation in the filtering of sound through the trees, it was made clear, it was not to be. The Logging Company came in and literally stripped the land. They paid the fines for their actions and continued to strip the 1000’s of acres around the Spruce Mountain Wind Project.
It is clear that the wind company, land owners of the logging properties, walk hand in hand on these wind projects.
There is no consideration for the ECHO Effect from the surrounding ridges and sound traveling down into the valleys.
It has been made clear that this is not a time for emotions. It is clear that the distress felt by the victims of these projects will not be considered.
I present to you some facts from Woodstock:
There are over 90 abutting properties to the Spruce Mountain wind project. Most of those are seasonal residents. The figures that I am submitting to you are taken from the Woodstock Map/Lot Index dated Tuesday, January 2008. I checked with the town manager and he assured me that this was the latest, up to date version.
Concord Pond Area-
• 75 properties,
• Towns value for buildings and land, $4,316,090.
• 1 local household considered year round resident of Woodstock
Shagg Pond Area-
• 67 properties,
• Towns value for buildings and land $4,507,390.
• 3 local households considered year round residents of Woodstock
Cushman and Perkins Valley Road-
• 54 properties,
Town’s value for buildings and land, $$3,241,030.
• 29 residents considered year round residents of Woodstock.
The Combined total,
• properties within 1.5 miles, 196
• property values to the town- $12,064,510.00
• The number of residential property owners considered year round residents- 33
It is clear that the properties involved are mostly seasonal owners who pay taxes and buy groceries when they come to Woodstock. They may be considered seasonal citizens, yet, spend summers, go skiing, snowmobiling or just get away from their busy lives on weekends, year round. They have no vote at town meetings and could not participate in the decision of this wind project coming to their neighbor. Now they live with the blade flicker and the Whooosh Whooosh of industrial wind turbines. The wind turbines came to them and they are given a short list of alternatives in dealing with the noise. Please consider the impact this will have on the other small towns, who have or will have wind projects come to their town. Our small townships are now being put in the position no matter what they decide, for or against a wind ordinance; they can expect challenges from both sides of the issue. Law suits are costly, timely and can at times be indecisive in the outcome. (Moot) When the industrial wind projects are built in Canton, Carthage, Dixfield, Peru, Sumner and phase two of The Spruce Mountain Wind Project is put into motion, these figures, one town at a time, will add up.
I believe that the Maine Legislature put us in this position of Fight or Flee and I believe the legislation should send a strong message to the wind industry. It is time for educating yourselves on the dangers of infra sound and making regulations that protect the citizens of Maine. Distance is the only control factor when dealing with this industry. I believe that the BEP’s intents are good, but feel that the 42 dB(a) is still too high, yet, it is a beginning.
Industrial wind turbines have a unique sound, they are a unique industry and the citizens of Maine deserve to be protected to the fullest from industrial wind’s noise pollution. I have been following the PUC with First Wind and see a pattern with the challenge to ethics, along with morals. Business is business and we should all go by the same rules, with the same penalties. They say that Enron is dead, yet, we are still dealing with the ghost of Enron,
There are other alternatives to choose from and Maine is already 30% renewable energy. Remove the cap on hydro and let the waters run. In these economic times, we should be consolidating, rather than wasting federal dollars on rich man’s projects. The down fall is that until someone tells the rich guy, he can’t walk all over the little guy, there will be casualties. The seasonal residents, tax payers and abutters to the Spruce Mountain Wind project are caught in the cross fire of this warring power for dominance on Maine’s mountains.
- Agree Agree (1)
verified on "Local schools stand to get more state money for education"
Your first sentence makes it
Your first sentence makes it sound like the money is going to go to give all the teachers raises. If any of it is, it's very little. The teachers are doing more than enough work to earn their salaries. Many are placed in extremely challenging positions, and nothing is nearly as black and white as you present it.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.