ANDOVER - Sixty workers employed by Ethan Allen Furniture at its Andover sawmill and dimension mill operation learned Wednesday they have less than 60 days to find work elsewhere.
The furniture maker, which is based in Danbury, Conn., announced Wednesday that America's severe recession has forced it to consolidate the Andover mill into its sawmill and dimension mill operation in Beecher Falls, Vt.
Dimension mills cut wood into workable lumber. A leading manufacturer and retailer of quality home furnishings, Ethan Allen is consolidating the Beecher Falls mill's machining, assembly and finishing operations into its Orleans, Vt. plant. This will permanently end the jobs of 260 Beecher Falls millworkers, said David R. Callen, a vice president for Ethan Allen Global Inc. and Subsidiaries.
"Unfortunately, virtually every position will be terminated," Callen said in an e-mail statement Thursday afternoon. "The associates were informed of the support being provided for them, which will include severance pay."
He said that as of Wednesday, when affected employees were told the news, the consolidation transitions would happen in the next 60 days.
"We very much regret the impact of this realignment to our Andover and affected Beecher Falls associates," Farooq Kathwari, chairman and chief executive officer said in a Wednesday news release. Callen said the consolidations and job terminations were directly related to the nation's economic recession, major declines in sales and profitability and a period of sharp decline in consumer confidence, and liquidations of major competitive home furnishings.
"This action is being taken after several months of extended down time and layoffs at all the plants, which was hard on all the associates and a difficult way to run a business," Callen said. "While we sincerely regret the need for the decision and the impact this has on so many of our associates, action was needed at this time," he said.
"The result of these realignments is intended to get the over 325 remaining Vermont-based employees back to working a more normal full-time schedule," he said.
In its third-quarter sales and earnings report, Ethan Allen recorded retail-delivered sales down 41.8 percent in the three months ending on March 31, compared to the prior year's third quarter. Wholesale sales were $88.1 million, compared to $156.3 million in the prior year's quarter.
"While the severe recession has resulted in many challenges, it has also accelerated our process of reinvention," Kathwari said. "This realignment provides us an opportunity to maintain a competitive advantage from manufacturing in the U.S."
tkarkos@sunjournal.com
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you
to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within
one business day to verify your account.
Woodstock Site Plan Review
Page 15 , Number 18
Noise: the proposed development shall not raise noise levels to the extent that abutting and/or nearby residents are adversely affect.
A) The maximum permissible sound pressure level of any continuous, regular or frequent or an intermittent source of sound produced by any activity shall be limited by the time period and land use which it abuts listed below. Sound levels shall be measured at 4 feet above the ground at the property boundary of the source.
Sound pressure level limits using the sound equivalent level of one hour (leq 60 measured in dB(a) scale)
7:00 am to 10:00pm, residential 55 dB(a)
10:00pm to 7:00am residential 45 dB(a)
B) Noise shall be measured by a meter set on the A-weight response scale, fast response. The meter shall meet the American National Standards (ANSA SI-4-1961) American standard specification for general purpose sound meters.
My name is Leola Ballweber, I live in Woodstock, Maine. The town of Woodstock Planning board used the DEP guide lines for sound, yet, approved a waiver to raise the sound levels.
The wind project was appealed at the town level, DEP level, which Warren Brown suggested a NRO for 3 turbines starting at 7pm and adding 3 more from 10pm till 7am, 6 of 10 turbines would be restricted during this time and then it was off to the BEP. After the Supreme Court case was dropped, only 20% chance in the citizen’s favor. Patriot Renewable petitioned for the NRO to be removed. My understanding is that it was granted and the NRO was removed.
What was learned was that the state does not have regulations in place to protect the citizens from the unique infra-sound projected by industrial wind turbines.
The science is there to prove it exists, yet it is the citizens who are left to protect themselves.
The wind industry does and will not admit that these machines on top of Maine’s mountains make noise.
The sound maps that are computer generated are flawed and incorrect in these projects.
Bayroot, LLC owns land that is part of the Spruce Mount Wind Project, leases were giving. As soon as the Spruce mountain wind project began construction, Bayroot, LLC began removing timber between abutting properties and the wind project. If, the abutters had taken some consolation in the filtering of sound through the trees, it was made clear, it was not to be. The Logging Company came in and literally stripped the land. They paid the fines for their actions and continued to strip the 1000’s of acres around the Spruce Mountain Wind Project.
It is clear that the wind company, land owners of the logging properties, walk hand in hand on these wind projects.
There is no consideration for the ECHO Effect from the surrounding ridges and sound traveling down into the valleys.
It has been made clear that this is not a time for emotions. It is clear that the distress felt by the victims of these projects will not be considered.
I present to you some facts from Woodstock:
There are over 90 abutting properties to the Spruce Mountain wind project. Most of those are seasonal residents. The figures that I am submitting to you are taken from the Woodstock Map/Lot Index dated Tuesday, January 2008. I checked with the town manager and he assured me that this was the latest, up to date version.
Concord Pond Area-
• 75 properties,
• Towns value for buildings and land, $4,316,090.
• 1 local household considered year round resident of Woodstock
Shagg Pond Area-
• 67 properties,
• Towns value for buildings and land $4,507,390.
• 3 local households considered year round residents of Woodstock
Cushman and Perkins Valley Road-
• 54 properties,
Town’s value for buildings and land, $$3,241,030.
• 29 residents considered year round residents of Woodstock.
The Combined total,
• properties within 1.5 miles, 196
• property values to the town- $12,064,510.00
• The number of residential property owners considered year round residents- 33
It is clear that the properties involved are mostly seasonal owners who pay taxes and buy groceries when they come to Woodstock. They may be considered seasonal citizens, yet, spend summers, go skiing, snowmobiling or just get away from their busy lives on weekends, year round. They have no vote at town meetings and could not participate in the decision of this wind project coming to their neighbor. Now they live with the blade flicker and the Whooosh Whooosh of industrial wind turbines. The wind turbines came to them and they are given a short list of alternatives in dealing with the noise. Please consider the impact this will have on the other small towns, who have or will have wind projects come to their town. Our small townships are now being put in the position no matter what they decide, for or against a wind ordinance; they can expect challenges from both sides of the issue. Law suits are costly, timely and can at times be indecisive in the outcome. (Moot) When the industrial wind projects are built in Canton, Carthage, Dixfield, Peru, Sumner and phase two of The Spruce Mountain Wind Project is put into motion, these figures, one town at a time, will add up.
I believe that the Maine Legislature put us in this position of Fight or Flee and I believe the legislation should send a strong message to the wind industry. It is time for educating yourselves on the dangers of infra sound and making regulations that protect the citizens of Maine. Distance is the only control factor when dealing with this industry. I believe that the BEP’s intents are good, but feel that the 42 dB(a) is still too high, yet, it is a beginning.
Industrial wind turbines have a unique sound, they are a unique industry and the citizens of Maine deserve to be protected to the fullest from industrial wind’s noise pollution. I have been following the PUC with First Wind and see a pattern with the challenge to ethics, along with morals. Business is business and we should all go by the same rules, with the same penalties. They say that Enron is dead, yet, we are still dealing with the ghost of Enron,
There are other alternatives to choose from and Maine is already 30% renewable energy. Remove the cap on hydro and let the waters run. In these economic times, we should be consolidating, rather than wasting federal dollars on rich man’s projects. The down fall is that until someone tells the rich guy, he can’t walk all over the little guy, there will be casualties. The seasonal residents, tax payers and abutters to the Spruce Mountain Wind project are caught in the cross fire of this warring power for dominance on Maine’s mountains.
Your first sentence makes it sound like the money is going to go to give all the teachers raises. If any of it is, it's very little. The teachers are doing more than enough work to earn their salaries. Many are placed in extremely challenging positions, and nothing is nearly as black and white as you present it.
LePage's bill refer only to Maine. My experience refers only to Maine. I can't agree with you more that in some places and with some superintendents bad teachers grow like weeds. Its not a problem of teacher evaluations. The administrators know who the bad teachers are just as you and I did. The problem is they will not do their jobs and document why they are bad so that they can be fired.
Normally they use the military solution. I can't get into specifics, but we had a teacher who was worse than incompetent, worse than bad. Gave grades based on gender of the student and explicitly on their relationship. Superintendent promoted the teacher to a non-teaching position at greatly increased pay. Zero documentation.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.